Pakistan and the United States Military Presence: Implications

07 Jan, 2002    ·   691

Dr Subhash Kapila points out that US military presence in Pakistan would only place the latter in a political and strategic fix


Pakistan has been designated by US policy planners and decision-makers as an “enduring strategic ally of long standing”. Military-to-military relationships of these strategic allies apart, Pakistan’s strategic and military assistance to the United States in the last four decades boils down to :-

 

 

o  Provision of strategic surveillance flights and radar monitoring of the erstwhile Soviet Union . The American U-2 flights from Peshawar may be recalled here.

  

 

o                    Providing and training Islamic fundamentalists to fight the CIA’s wars in Afghanistan in the 1980s. President Musharraf was a coordinator and was interacting with the CIA during the Afghan operations.                    

 

 

o                    Funneling American arms, equipment and stores for the Afghan mujahideens fighting the proxy war against the Russians in the 1980s. Pakistan , as a strategic ally of the United States , was notably absent however as a front-line ally during the Gulf War. Pakistan chose to send a token military force to Mecca and Medina “to defend the holy places of Islam, as if these needed protection.”

                   

 

The current US military presence in Pakistan for the Afghanistan operations is wholly unprecedented. Even in the hey-day of their military alliance relationship, a US military presence in Pakistan never occurred.

 

 

Current reports of its military presence in Pakistan indicate that:- 

 

 

o                    United States has more than 30,000 armed forces personnel stationed in Pakistan .

                   

 

o                    Four Pakistan air-bases in Baluchistan are being used by it.

                   

 

o                    US troops are on the Afghan side of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border with rights to engage in “hot pursuit” into Pakistan territory.

                   

 

o                    United States has discussed with Pakistan the leasing of 22,000 acres of land in Baluchistan to set up exclusive military bases for its presence in Pakistan .

                   

 

The US military presence in Pakistan seems to be acquiring a semi-permanent nature. Statements made by US leaders indicate that its counter-terrorism operations against Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda will continue till they are brought to book. This military presence in Pakistan , whether dictated to General Musharraf or invited by him will have two implications for Pakistan , namely, its internal political situation and its foreign policy.

 

 

The internal implications for Pakistan could be grievous. It could mark the end of General Musharraf. General Musharraf’s speech on 12 January 2002, while music to the West, is a direct and daunting challenge to the multitude of Islamic Rightists/fundamentalists who embrace not only the economically backward but also the lower and middle rungs of the armed forces, academia and intelligentsia. To maintain that General Musharraf has full control over this situation would be an over simplification. It is political dynamite ready for ignition by any Pakistani politician. The longer the American military presence in Pakistan continues the more volatile the situation will become.

 

 

General Musharraf’s claim that by allowing the US military presence in Pakistan he has saved Pakistan ’s existence and its nuclear assets rings hollow. Pakistanis view their national nuclear assets as being mortgaged now to US which can take them out at will. The US , in any case, would never have threatened or allowed anybone to threaten Pakistan ’s existence. General Musharraf could thus become a victim of his own policy, due to the internal political dynamics and those within Pakistan ’s military hierarchy.

 

 

The US military presence in Pakistan also has external regional implications, most seriously for Pakistan ’s “all weather and tested ally” China . The major plank of Pakistani foreign policy is China , since it forecloses China ’s strategic objectives in South Asia and the Middle East . In the absence of any Pakistani quid-pro-quo, China may explore its other options. This could be a serious setback for Pakistan ’s foreign policy.

 

 

In conclusion, it can be said that Pakistan is in a political and strategic fix. Internally, the US such a presence could generate internal disorder and General Musharraf’s exit. Externally, Pakistan ’s foreign policy choices would get severely restricted. In the Islamic context, Pakistan’s claim to be the ‘Citadel of Islam’ would come into ridicule, when Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia are discreetly pressurizing the US to withdraw its military presence. General Musharraf would be seen as inviting the US military presence, not for Pakistan ’s existence, but to perpetuate his own existence in power. 

POPULAR COMMENTARIES