Indo-US Relations: Past, Present and Future
22 Nov, 2001 · 644
Speech delivered by Prof Thomas Thornton, John Hopkins University at the India International Centre, New Delhi on 19 November 2001
In his lucid and compressed presentation, Prof Thornton made the following points:
- Immediately after
’s independence there was an expectation of developing good relations between the two countries. But the relations had to face certain hard realities of world politics. Both pursued different interests, which were often conflicting. Because of its unilateralist tendencies theIndia consistently thwartedUS from realizing its interests. The meagerness of relations was also due toIndia ’s different worldview and US’s disinterestedness onIndia .India - The
had enormous influence at a point in time on the economic and agricultural policies ofUS , especially when the latter was struggling to finance its Third Five-Year plan. But later things changed.India - The Indo-Pak wars of 1965 and 1971 were shocks for
. During these wars theWashington was more worried aboutUS andChina Soviet Union than happenings in the South Asian region. The academic community become alienated during this period due to visa restrictions placed on their visitingUS .India - During the Emergency the
liberal community lost interest inUS . ButIndia survived that scar and continues as a vibrant democracy. I am confident and happy thatIndia will remain as a democratic country forever.India - The
was irritated withUS in the Afghan crisis andIndia with theIndia over the latter’s support toUS .Pakistan ’s nuclear tests seriously affected the bilateral relationship because of theIndia 's general non-proliferation concerns.US - The
does not buy Indian views onUS Kashmir . It condemns cross-border violence, but at the same time, is concerned over the excesses by Indian security forces. Any solution to the issue should be based on the “wishes of the people of J&K”. - Both countries should not base their relations on negativism, like
opposition to the Kyoto Protocol, setting up of International War Crimes Tribunal and so on. They should not allow themselves to be sucked into narrow cultural conflicts. The ongoing war against terrorism should not be seen as a “clash of civilizations” but against the tragedy that struck theUS ; its efforts in this regard should not be considered as directed against a particular community.US - Unlike in the past there is a growing awareness in the
aboutUS and we should build on this. It is not appropriate to place all the eggs of bilateral relations in security basket; these relations should be broad-based.India -
In this regard, the future of Indo-US relations is bright, specifically in two fields: Economics and Indian Americans, especially the Indian Americans, who are doing extremely well. The
is gaining a lot from them.US
