Home Contact Us
Search :


Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2933, 7 August 2009
Negotiating with China
Bhartendu Kumar Singh
Indian Defence Accounts Service
e-mail: bhartendukumarsingh@gmail.com

It is almost three decades since China and India initiated their border talks. While the levels of dialogue were raised, an agreement is still not in sight. So, when the Special Representatives (SRs) of the two countries meet for the 13th round of border talks in New Delhi, expectations will probably be mellow and like a dozen times before, this meeting may also end up only with incremental outcomes. However, instead of blaming our interlocutors for protracted talks, we need to study the issues that prevent them from achieving successful negotiations with their Chinese counterparts. Three issues come to the forefront: India’s inability to decode the Chinese grand strategy; failure to develop an alternative future in case the border talks fail; and lack of intellectual-political consensus.
Cultural problems apart, Indians have been unable to decode the Chinese grand strategy and mind games in the border talks. China is a satisfied party in the border talks, its claims notwithstanding. It got what it wanted (the Aksai Chin corridor linking Xinjiang with Tibet), partially through discreet encroachment in the late 1950s and the rest through open capture in the 1962 War. For a long time, China floated the ‘swap proposal’ based on so-called ‘mutual understanding and mutual accommodation’ to legalise its occupation. When that did not cut any ice, it suggested New Delhi put the contentious border issue on the back-burner and focus on other aspects of bilateral relations. Decades later, while the two countries do have a healthy bilateral relationship, China continues to limit the border talks to procedural roadmaps.
The 2005 declaration on ‘political guidelines and parameters’ had provided hopes about the possible contours of a mutually-agreed border. However, these developments were muddled by China’s aggressive claims on the Tawang tract of Arunachal Pradesh, supplemented by frequent incidents of border intrusions across the LAC. The construction of roads, railways and airports in Tibet have further added to Chinese ambivalence and consolidated its future strategy in the region. True, China has resolved its boundary disputes with many other countries, the latest being the China-Vietnam treaty over land demarcation and joint exploration and development of disputed areas in the South China Sea. However, China’s impasse over the Diayaoutai Island with Japan and the South China Sea disputes with other ASEAN countries continue without any substantial progress.

While Chinese tactics remain a challenge for our negotiators, Sinologists and war experts in India are yet to develop an ‘alternative future’ in case the border talks fail. This is regrettable since India is one of the six countries against whom China has used force in the past. Will China use force on the border issue again? Can India defend itself without losing any more territory? The border aside, what are the other issues that could induce a conflict between them? Perhaps a lot would depend on China’s perception of India as a military power. Unfortunately, most Indian studies on China’s military modernization tend to follow the universal thinking that China’s military modernisation is aimed at Taiwan. Similarly, the PLA plays an important role in the Chinese decision-making process but this fact is yet to get proportionate attention in India.

The challenge for Indian negotiators is further complicated by lack of domestic consensus, both intellectual and political. While eminent Sinologists like Roderick McFarquhar hold the Chinese leadership guilty for the 1962 War, many intellectuals in India still judge that war as well as the border problem from a Maxwellian prism and do not take the pains to read the original papers. While China boasts successful border agreements with many neighbours, India is yet to compare the Chinese objectives and tactics in these negotiations and highlight the common threads as ‘policy feedback.’ Instead, we have casual propositions such as ‘swap of territories’ or ‘status quo,’ suggested in some recent works, which tend to validate Chinese claims and violate the spirit of the Indian Parliament’s 1963 resolution.
Also, while all the mainstream political parties agree about building a better relationship with China, they hesitate in taking a public posture on an agreeable border with China. During the recent general elections, the foreign policy debate was largely centred around the US, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Pakistan. China remained marginalised in the election manifestoes, with the sole exception being the left parties. But then, the stand of the Indian Left on Sino-Indian relations or the border problem has been of little help. With both intellectuals and politicians shying away from actively shaping public opinion, the challenges for India’s negotiators rise manifold.
Negotiating with China has been a challenge for many countries. India is no exception. While we have the advantage of long engagement and healthy bilateral relations, successful negotiations warrant more investments in Chinese history, culture, negotiating strategies and analyses of changing Chinese perception of India. Domestically, India has the benefit of stable government and visionary leadership. Our negotiating strategy is in seasoned hands. All we need is an innovative strategy that is able to negotiate a border package acceptable to Indian popular aspirations. This is bound to take time. For the moment, we need to support our negotiators and be patient.
Note: The author is on deputation to the United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS). The views expressed herein are those of the author alone.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Ruhee Neog,
"‘Nuclear Weapons, Costs and Myths’: In Response," 16 September 2013
Rajaram Panda,
"Patching Up?," 24 June 2013
Teshu Singh,
"Xi-Obama Summit," 21 June 2013
Rajaram Panda,
"North Korea: “An All-Out Confrontation” After Fresh UNSC Sanctions?," 28 January 2013
Radhakrishna Rao,
"Why does India need an Aerospace Command?," 1 February 2012
Amruta Karambelkar,
"Vietnam and the South China Sea: Hypothetical Scenarios," 22 December 2011
Jayasree Nath,
"Stilwell Route: What are its Economic Implications?," 31 October 2011
Teshu Singh,
"Chinese Economy: Inflation on the Rise and Manufacturing on the Wane," 29 July 2011
Bhim B Subba,
"Border Trade at Nathu La: Five Years After," 18 July 2011
Teshu Singh,
"Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway: Strategic Significance," 8 July 2011

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
India's China Policy: Should it be ‘Effective’ or ‘Assertive’?

Agni V: Will it Enhance India’s Deterrence against China?

China’s Military Modernization: The Pentagon Report and Indian Fears

Defence, Development and National Security: Challenges for Naresh Chandra Committee

Resurrecting the Sino-Indian Defence Dialogue

Chinese Military Power and the Politics of Reports

The Annual Report of the MoD: Need for Change?

Chinese Military 'Website' : Possible Interpretations

China's 'Stride 2009' and India

Beyond the Chinese fantasy: Will India Disintegrate?

Taking China Seriously

Clamour over the Henderson Brooks Report: Missing the Wood for the Trees?

Does China Matter? Elections and Foreign Policy Issues in India

China and the Politics of UN Peacekeeping

Has India's Military Diplomacy Come of Age?

China, India and the Red Star over Nepal

China, India and the Tibet Crisis

China's Emergence as India's Largest Trade Partner

The Indian Prime Minister's Visit to China

The Kunming Joint Military Exercises and Sino-Indian Relations

Whither China's Democratic Transition?

Ideology, Foreign Policy and the Rhetoric of Anti-Americanism

Bullets vs. Ballots: Foreign Policy Decision-Making in China and India

India, China and the Prospects of Asian Economic Community

Beyond the Nuclear Deal: India, China and the Asian Balance of Power

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com