Home Contact Us
Search :
   

Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2753, 15 December 2008
 
BIMSTEC: Need to Move Beyond the Linkage Syndrome
Yogendra Singh
Yogendra Singh PhD Candidate JNU,New Delhi
email-yogendrajnu@gmail.com
 

The idea of BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation), an amalgamation of Thailand's Look West Policy and India's Look East Policy, now seems ready to take-off ten years after its inception. The second summit of BIMSTEC ended with a sense of optimism towards early implementation of the cooperation on the agreed priority sectors. The agenda finalized in the summit reflects that BIMSTEC is likely to prefer a functionalist strategy of developing the sector-wise cooperative structures rather envisaging a full-fledged framework of a regional organization with long term goals. Certainly, a strategy of enhancing sectoral cooperation is a welcome step and if it works properly at the implementation level, the future of the BIMSTEC region will be more promising.

Nevertheless, the tendency to view BIMSTEC only as a sub-regional framework of cooperation linking South and Southeast Asia underestimates its potential of evolving as a regional organization like SAARC. Though BIMSTEC is a bridge between South and Southeast Asia, there exists ample scope of strengthening multi-sectoral cooperation within BIMSTEC, which can facilitate its evolution as a viable regional organization. However, even the second summit of BIMSTEC failed to give any signal in this regard, as evident from the fact that no decision was taken to establish a permanent secretariat for BIMSTEC.

As far as India is concerned, BIMSTEC in comparison to SAARC offers a much more viable alternative of harnessing the regional economic complementarities through the formation of a regional bloc. In economic terms, the BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement (BFTA) offers much than SAFTA. Apart from FTA in goods, the BFTA points out the aim of concluding an FTA in services and investment while the SAFTA lacks the provisions of FTA in goods. In addition, the establishment of BFTA is based on a negative list approach that is more promising than the positive list approach list followed by the SAFTA. Furthermore, the BFTA offers greater possibility of trade creation than SAFTA. With a combined GDP of US$750 billion the potential of trade creation under BFTA is estimated to be between US$43 and 59 billion.

Moreover, the prospect of political stability in the BIMSTEC region is brighter than the SAARC given the presence of crisis-ridden Pakistan and Afghanistan in the SAARC, and prevailing animosity between India and Pakistan, which make the realization of the SAARC goals a myth. However, the purpose of the argument is not to undermine the role of SAARC. Definitely, SAARC is driven by a different spectrum of strategic imperatives.

It is imperative on the part of India to materialize the potential of regional cooperation in its eastern frontier. There are two alternatives available before India in this regard - BIMSTEC, and China-led Kunming Initiative. Kunming Initiative is an idea to develop a growth quadrangle to promote sub regional cooperation comprising of China's Yunnan Province, India's Northeast, Myanmar and Bangladesh. However, given the increasing Sinicization of the northern Myanmar after the opening of the borders with China, India has been skeptical to the idea of Kunming Initiative. In this backdrop, the BIMSTEC provides an additional advantage to India to develop the design of a regional cooperation keeping away the Chinese influence.

However, the BIMSTEC can not evolve as a full-fledged regional cooperative framework unless and until a sense of community or region is developed in the minds of the people. Given the diverse cultural landscape of the region, the task of evolving a common sense of identity is likely to be very difficult, but some efforts in this direction can be made by reviving the historical cultural linkages, such as the Thai-Ahom ethnic linkages.

To enhance the people-to-people contact and accelerate the economic integration of the BIMSTEC, the second summit considered the rapid development of the transport infrastructure as a key issue. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has conducted a study in this regard. The role of ADB has been significant in the economic integration of another sub region of Asia, the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS). As a result of the coordination between ADB and the member countries, the GMS region has achieved an adequate level of connectivity which accelerated the process of regional economic integration. Now the total intra-regional trade in the GMS has increased almost 12 times of the 1992 level. In addition, the annul tourist arrival has doubled from 10 million in 1995 to 20 million in 2005. What happened in the GMS can also be replicated in the case of the BIMSTEC.

Given the strategic advantage of the BIMSTEC, exercises to strengthen it will likely to be continued as a priority area in the India's Look East Policy design. As evident from the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's statement that time has come for the idea of BIMSTEC. However, it is yet to be decided that in what way the idea will be shaped whether it would be limited merely as a bridge between SAARC and ASEAN or will move beyond the linkage syndrome.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Burma and the Limits of International Influence

Bollywood in Southeast Asia

India-Malaysia CECA Negotiations: A Long Road Ahead

Malaysian General Elections 2008: A Move Towards Pluralistic Politics

Reopening of the Stilwell Road: At a Standstill

India-Singapore CECA Enters Second Phase

Malaysia's Ethnic Indians Demand

India's Energy Diplomacy Gets a Jolt in Myanmar

India ASEAN FTA: Problems and Prospects

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com