Home Contact Us
Search :
   

Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2753, 15 December 2008
 
BIMSTEC: Need to Move Beyond the Linkage Syndrome
Yogendra Singh
Yogendra Singh PhD Candidate JNU,New Delhi
email-yogendrajnu@gmail.com
 

The idea of BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation), an amalgamation of Thailand's Look West Policy and India's Look East Policy, now seems ready to take-off ten years after its inception. The second summit of BIMSTEC ended with a sense of optimism towards early implementation of the cooperation on the agreed priority sectors. The agenda finalized in the summit reflects that BIMSTEC is likely to prefer a functionalist strategy of developing the sector-wise cooperative structures rather envisaging a full-fledged framework of a regional organization with long term goals. Certainly, a strategy of enhancing sectoral cooperation is a welcome step and if it works properly at the implementation level, the future of the BIMSTEC region will be more promising.

Nevertheless, the tendency to view BIMSTEC only as a sub-regional framework of cooperation linking South and Southeast Asia underestimates its potential of evolving as a regional organization like SAARC. Though BIMSTEC is a bridge between South and Southeast Asia, there exists ample scope of strengthening multi-sectoral cooperation within BIMSTEC, which can facilitate its evolution as a viable regional organization. However, even the second summit of BIMSTEC failed to give any signal in this regard, as evident from the fact that no decision was taken to establish a permanent secretariat for BIMSTEC.

As far as India is concerned, BIMSTEC in comparison to SAARC offers a much more viable alternative of harnessing the regional economic complementarities through the formation of a regional bloc. In economic terms, the BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement (BFTA) offers much than SAFTA. Apart from FTA in goods, the BFTA points out the aim of concluding an FTA in services and investment while the SAFTA lacks the provisions of FTA in goods. In addition, the establishment of BFTA is based on a negative list approach that is more promising than the positive list approach list followed by the SAFTA. Furthermore, the BFTA offers greater possibility of trade creation than SAFTA. With a combined GDP of US$750 billion the potential of trade creation under BFTA is estimated to be between US$43 and 59 billion.

Moreover, the prospect of political stability in the BIMSTEC region is brighter than the SAARC given the presence of crisis-ridden Pakistan and Afghanistan in the SAARC, and prevailing animosity between India and Pakistan, which make the realization of the SAARC goals a myth. However, the purpose of the argument is not to undermine the role of SAARC. Definitely, SAARC is driven by a different spectrum of strategic imperatives.

It is imperative on the part of India to materialize the potential of regional cooperation in its eastern frontier. There are two alternatives available before India in this regard - BIMSTEC, and China-led Kunming Initiative. Kunming Initiative is an idea to develop a growth quadrangle to promote sub regional cooperation comprising of China's Yunnan Province, India's Northeast, Myanmar and Bangladesh. However, given the increasing Sinicization of the northern Myanmar after the opening of the borders with China, India has been skeptical to the idea of Kunming Initiative. In this backdrop, the BIMSTEC provides an additional advantage to India to develop the design of a regional cooperation keeping away the Chinese influence.

However, the BIMSTEC can not evolve as a full-fledged regional cooperative framework unless and until a sense of community or region is developed in the minds of the people. Given the diverse cultural landscape of the region, the task of evolving a common sense of identity is likely to be very difficult, but some efforts in this direction can be made by reviving the historical cultural linkages, such as the Thai-Ahom ethnic linkages.

To enhance the people-to-people contact and accelerate the economic integration of the BIMSTEC, the second summit considered the rapid development of the transport infrastructure as a key issue. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has conducted a study in this regard. The role of ADB has been significant in the economic integration of another sub region of Asia, the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS). As a result of the coordination between ADB and the member countries, the GMS region has achieved an adequate level of connectivity which accelerated the process of regional economic integration. Now the total intra-regional trade in the GMS has increased almost 12 times of the 1992 level. In addition, the annul tourist arrival has doubled from 10 million in 1995 to 20 million in 2005. What happened in the GMS can also be replicated in the case of the BIMSTEC.

Given the strategic advantage of the BIMSTEC, exercises to strengthen it will likely to be continued as a priority area in the India's Look East Policy design. As evident from the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's statement that time has come for the idea of BIMSTEC. However, it is yet to be decided that in what way the idea will be shaped whether it would be limited merely as a bridge between SAARC and ASEAN or will move beyond the linkage syndrome.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Pakistan: Crouching Democrats, Hidden Khakis
Mullah Fazlullah: Challenges to the ?Eliminate or Extradite? Approach
Taliban after Afghan Elections: Spring Offensive or the Last Stand?
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Of Inquilab and the Inquilabis
Pakistan: Of Messiahs and Marches
Zarb-e-Azb: The Decisive Strike

Dateline Kabul
Mariam Safi
Can Afghanistan Become a "Perfect Place?"
Afghanistan: Political Crises After the Presidential Run-off
Taliban?s Spring Offensive: Are the ANSF Prepared?
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
Abe?s Successful Visit to Dhaka: Two Political Challenges
Girl Summit Diplomacy and Bangladesh-UK Relations
India-Bangladesh: After Sushma Swaraj's Visit

Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
Changing Global Balance of Power: Obama?s Response
Obama Administration: Re-engaging India
US in South Asia: Declining Influence
East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
Modi's Visit to Japan: Gauging Inter-State Relations in Asia
North Korea: Seeking New Friends?
China-South Korea: Changing Dynamics of Regional Politics

Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
India-Nepal Hydroelectricity Deal: Making it Count
Federalism and Nepal: Internal Differences
Modi and Nepal-India Relations
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Maritime Silk Road: Can India Leverage It?
BRICS: The Oceanic Connections
India-EU: Exploring Maritime Convergences

Middle Kingdom
DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Remembering Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Musings on the Bomb
The Second Nuclear Age in the Asia Pacific

Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Six Thousand Plus Killed: The Naxal Ideology of Violence
Anti-Naxal Operations: Seeking Refuge in Symbolism
A 'New' Counter-Naxal Action Plan
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Obama?s New Strategy towards the Islamic State: Implications for India
Modi?s Tryst with Abe
Thinking the Unthinkable: Promoting Nuclear Disarmament

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
The Islamic State: No Country for the Old World Order
India and the Conflict in Gaza
India in Iraq: Need for Better Focus
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
Uranium and Nuclear Power: Three Indian Stories
A Strategic Review for India
Indian Ratification of the Additional Protocol: Mischievous Reports Miss its Significance

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
The Islamic State Caliphate: A Mirage of Resurrection
A Covenant Sans Sword
Strife on the Global Commons
Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka and China: Towards Innovation Driven Economies
India-Sri Lanka: Strengthening Regional Cooperation
Sri Lanka: A New Melody for Nation-building
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
Pakistan: Why is Army against Nawaz Sharif?
Pakistan: Degraded Democracy
Domestic Politicking in Pakistan: It's Not Cricket, Stupid!
Voice from America
Amit Gupta
India and Australia: Beyond Curry, Cricket, and Commonwealth
And Then There is the Middle East: The Lack of an End-Game
US and the World Cup: Nationalism without Football?

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Burma and the Limits of International Influence

Bollywood in Southeast Asia

India-Malaysia CECA Negotiations: A Long Road Ahead

Malaysian General Elections 2008: A Move Towards Pluralistic Politics

Reopening of the Stilwell Road: At a Standstill

India-Singapore CECA Enters Second Phase

Malaysia's Ethnic Indians Demand

India's Energy Diplomacy Gets a Jolt in Myanmar

India ASEAN FTA: Problems and Prospects

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com