Home Contact Us  
   

US & South Asia - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4436, 14 May 2014
 

US in Asia Pacific

Rebalancing: An Instrument of Economic Diplomacy
Urbi Das
MPhil scholar, School of International Studies, JNU
Email: dasurbi@yahoo.com
 

After prolonged engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US has finally made a move to renew its commitment towards Asia, which has always been an arena of US strategic and economic interest. The Asian rebalancing strategy highlights the current power shift in the international order from the west to the east. The economic engagement between the US and the Pacific nations is one the major pillars of the rebalancing strategy as the US identifies ‘economic statecraft’ as a major plank of its ‘Pivot to Asia’. The strategy aims at fostering economic solutions to strategic problems through commercial diplomacy by harnessing both the ‘economies of power and the power of economies’.

Inquiring into the Obama administration’s keen interest in the Asia Pacific, it should be mentioned that the US has always been a Pacific power. The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) established in 1989 already works as one of the key drivers of intensive economic cooperation seeking to promote free trade among the economies of the Asia Pacific. The APEC economies inform a lion’s share of US’ investment and its export markets, amounting to 60 per cent of overall US exports in 2010.

On the onset of the millennium, Asia emerged as the US’ largest source of imports, accounting for 32.2 per cent (2010) of merchandise trade and the second-largest export market with a share of about 23.5 per cent (2010). With a growth rate of about 40 per cent, the East Asia and Asia Pacific region contributes to one third of global trade, which is more than any other region of the world. As the world’s most populous area, its rapidly growing economies provide a vast market, making it more attractive to global capitalism. It is a home to a number of American alliances and treaty partners like Japan, Philippines, Australia and South Korea, among others. Asia Pacific thus presents itself as the land of opportunity for the US.

As a part of this economic diplomacy, a number of steps have been taken by the Obama administration, among which the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is of utmost significance. The TPP represents the most credible road leading to the economic integration of the Asia Pacific, with the US engaging in the most ambitious model of trade relations with the economies of Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam.

The TPP stands to enhance US soft power in the region by allowing its companies an easy entry into the markets of the TPP member States. It would enlarge and broaden the Asian market for US exports since the ‘comprehensive and high standard’ Free Trade Agreement under the TPP aims to liberalise trade in nearly all goods and services including areas that go beyond the current commitments under the WTO. If successful, the TPP would give the US an unprecedented advantage in trade and investment since US companies would gain from its provisions for preferential intellectual property rights, thus enhancing its competitiveness in the Asian market.
Here, it should be noted that the US interest in the region is not only to develop and strengthen bilateral relations; a major part of the strategy aims to contain China and offset its influence. China’s rapid growth and muscle-flexing in the region has always been a cause of concern for the US. When the West was undergoing an economic downturn due to the great recession of 2008-2009, the Chinese economy continued to grow. This growing economic power let Beijing unveil its political influence in the region.

The American model of the TPP is a well-crafted trade regime that tactically excludes China. China responded to this by backing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) which is an alternative to the TPP. The RCEP excludes the US, and includes the ten ASEAN member States and ASEAN’s Free Trade Agreement partners (Australia, China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand).

The China-US conflict can pose a serious challenge to the small Asia Pacific nations since they have to confront the crucial question of siding with a model of trade with either the ‘dominant power’ or the ‘emerging power’.

In a globalised neo-liberal order, economics play a vital role in enhancing the comprehensive power of a nation. In other words, economic diplomacy is integrally linked and forms a necessary corollary to the strategic goal that the US wants to pursue in the region. Analysing the Asian rebalancing strategy within the parameters of its economic dimensions, it can be argued that with the successful conclusion of the TPP, the US stands to gain the fruits of a highly integrated market that will enhance its soft power in the region. However, US’ ‘economic statecraft’ will bear fruit only if it is able to negotiate well with the Asia Pacific nations, and eliminate the differences that stand in the way of the successful conclusion of the TPP. The road to such an ambitious accomplishment seems a long one, given China’s ‘charm offensive’ in the region.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Monish Tourangbam,
"Rebalancing: Where Does India Figure?," 14 May 2014
Vivek Mishra,
"Rebalancing: Philippines, Vietnam & Mutual Convergences," 22 April 2014
Shreya Upadhyay,
"Military Implications of the Rebalance: Increasing Chinese Aggression," 22 April 2014
D Suba Chandran,
"Pivot, Rebalance and What Next?," 13 March 2014
Chintamani Mahapatra,
"US-China Cold Confrontation: New Paradigm of Asian Security," 10 March 2014
Chintamani Mahapatra,
"US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?," 10 February 2014

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.