Home Contact Us
Search :
   

US & South Asia - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#478, 2 March 2001
 
Future of US Policy in South Asia: Controlling Pakistan
Parama Sinha Palit
Research Scholar, JNU.
 

Prior to his departure for South Asia in March 2000, President Clinton summed up his views on the region by calling it ‘the most dangerous place’. South Asian observers could have hardly agreed more. After Pokhran and Chagai in 1998, and Kargil in 1999, the region became exceptionally volatile. This is, of course, not to suggest that South Asia was a haven of peace before. While India demonstrated its nuclear capabilities way back in 1974, Pakistan ’s progress in assembling nuclear weapons became evident by the late 80s. Despite clear evidence regarding the nuclear threats of the region, the US chose to ignore them in the 70s and 80s. At that time, the concern for neutralising the Soviets was the overriding objective. Accordingly, it supported Pakistan ’s military ambitions. Pakistan utilised the magnanimity for building up its conventional weapons arsenal as well as nuclear strength. 

 

 

The end of the Cold War and disintegration of the Soviet Union changed the US perspective of South Asia . There were two reasons responsible for the transition. Pakistan was no longer useful to the US for deciding the balance of power in the region. Withdrawal of Soviet presence from Afghanistan marginalised Pakistan ’s significance as a political ally. Moreover, India gradually emerged as an attractive destination for US commercial investment due to economic reforms, a growing market and as a provider of information age services. A stable, secure India promised prospects of a happy hunting ground for US business interests. 

 

 

In the coming days, realisation of Washington ’s interests in South Asia would largely depend on its success in curbing Pakistan ’s aggressive designs, particularly in Kashmir . In this respect, the US has its job cut out. It has to ensure that the tensions between India and Pakistan do not snowball into a nuclear crisis for South Asia . Washington ’s handling of Kashmir and the larger issue of Indo-Pak relations would be decisive in determining the stability of the region. Its repeated insistence on a bilateral solution to Kashmir is well taken. But this doesn’t mean that it can be an indifferent observer and yet expect South Asia to fit snugly into its envisaged agenda of economic and commercial prosperity.   

 

 

Undoubtedly, the toughest challenge for US in South Asia would be restraining Pakistan from carrying on low-intensity warfare in Kashmir . Pakistan seems convinced in the capability of nuclear weapons in deterring larger, destructive wars. It believes that India wouldn’t escalate the low intensity conflict in Kashmir in the fear of precipitating a nuclear confrontation. Pakistan has inherent advantages in sporadic, small-scale conflicts, compared to full-fledged conventional tussles, where odds favour India . Washington has to be amply blunt in discouraging Pakistan from its current activities in Kashmir by pointing out the futility of the approach. 

 

 

Pakistan ’s rapid Islamisation and growth of a jihadist culture in the country have been responsible for its various irrational actions. As of now, the ruling establishment in Pakistan shows no inclination to revert to civilian governance. The sponsoring of terrorism in Kashmir , promotion of insurgency in various parts of India and provocative overtures at the LOC are part of an overall strategy to destabilise India . So far, India has resisted the temptation to cross the LOC and has prevented the conflict from blowing up. But it is important for the US to take the lead in impressing upon Pakistan the need to develop a constructive India policy. 

 

 

During the Cold War, South Asia was a politically balancing entity for the US . Now it is an economically sensitive region. The future US policy in South Asia will be determined by commercial and business motives. Cultivation of economic interests implies maintaining close ties with India . But that would call for greater distance with Pakistan . Given the present circumstances, getting closer to either India or Pakistan , would mean antagonising the other. Recent developments have underlined India ’s importance to the US as a priority zone in South Asia . Apart from economic interests, India and the US have certain common strategic concerns. These include, countering terrorism, managing nuclear proliferation and containing China

 

 

The long term US objective is to marginalise Pakistan and distance it from China too. A Chinese supported Pakistan is a substantial deterrent to the US perspective of a stable South Asia . China is a primary security threat to India . Besides, subsequent to Cold War, it is considered to be the principal strategic competitor to the US . For promoting long-term interests in Asia , the US would like to have strategic co-ordination with Japan and India . In trying to achieve the objective, the US has to ensure that the China-Pakistan alliance doesn’t emerge as a thorn in its flesh.

 

 

A crucial issue in this regard is the possible impact of other autonomous developments in US foreign policy on South Asia . One of these is the proposed NMD system. Development of NMD by the US is likely to provoke an identical reaction from China . A stronger China will imply a better-equipped Pakistan forcing India to consider new defence capabilities. The eventual outcome would be greater volatility and tension in South Asia which would be inimical to US interests in the region. 

 

 

 

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Energy Security: India Looks Ahead

US-Pakistan Alliance: Implications for South Asia

Pakistan and Terrorism: High time the US calls a Spade a Spade

Pakistanís Nuclear Gamble: A Deadly Ploy

US-India-Pakistan: Time for India to Flex its Muscles

The Vajpayee-Musharraf Meet: Will the US hand turn the tide?

The National Missile Defence System: To back or not to back!

India and China: Will the Taliban turn foes into Friends?

Pakistan-Taliban Nexus

Plebiscite to Engagement: The New U.S Outlook Towards Kashmir

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com