Home Contact Us
Search :
   

US & South Asia - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#3703, 22 August 2012
 
Sansha: Understanding China’s Increasing Foothold
Teshu Singh
Research Officer, IPCS
email: teshusinghdu@gmail.com
 

In the latest development in the South China Sea (SCS) region, China, in a move of unilateral aggression, established the new city of Sansha on Yongxing Island/Woody Island a few miles away from Hainan Province. Besides being a pivot point of the SCS, Woody Island is also the command centre of the SCS. China gained control of Woody Island in 1974 after a battle with Vietnam. This island is disputed between China, Taiwan and Vietnam. This incident has a raised few questions – Was there evidence of such Chinese moves in the region earlier? What would be the implications of this move?

The literal meaning of the word Sansha is ‘three sandbanks’ in Mandarin. Xisha (Paracel), Nansha (Spratlys) and Zhongsha (Middle Bank/Macclesfield) refer, in Chinese, to the West, South and Middle Banks, respectively. China had included Sansha in its county-level administration in 1959; at present it has been elevated to prefecture-level city. It has become a 658 prefecture-level city in Hainan Province, which is the largest Special Economic Zone in China. There is a post office, bank supermarket, hospital, desalination station, TV broadcast tower, and mobile telecommunications station on the island. Fresh water comes by freighter on a 13-hour journey from China’s southernmost province.

Chinese motives
In 1988 China and Vietnam fought a naval battle off the Spratlys Island; since then, there has not been an armed conflict in the region. Soon after the clash, the Seventh National People’s Congress, on 13 April 1988, included the Xisha (Paracels), Nansha (Spratlys) and Zhongsha (Macclesfield/Middle Bank) island groups and their surrounding water areas in Hainan Province.

In 1995 China and the Philippines confronted each other for the first time; with the Philippines protesting that China had constructed ‘steel supported structures’ on Mischief Reef. The reef lies well within the Philippine claim and lies close to Palawan islands. This was the first time that China had unilaterally changed the status quo at the expense of a claimant other than Vietnam. It created a substantial crisis in Southeast Asia and mobilized the ASEAN claimant to put together a response to China’s occupation of a reef located within the EEZ of the Philippines.

Against this background it is no surprise that the current unilateral establishment is a well calibrated move. It is not an impulsive decision, and has been carefully considered over the past twenty years. The idea of establishing Sansha city emerged in 2007; however it was deferred due to protests by Vietnam. In June 2012 the State Council approved the establishment of the city. This move by the Chinese amounts to unilateral aggression in times of peace. It represents China’s expanding toehold in disputed waters. Needless to say, the top priority of this new city is to safeguard China’s sovereignty over island and water in the area. The new city would further ‘consolidate administration’ over the Paracel Island chain, of which Yongxing/Woody Island is a part, and then the nearby Spratlys Island chain and Macclesfield Bank.

Implications
By expanding its maritime jurisdiction, China can keep an eye on not only the rugged outpost but the vast stretch of water aiming to strengthen its control over disputed water. Xinhua stated, ‘Sansha jurisdiction covers just 13 km of land including other islands and atolls in the SCS around Yongxing but two million kms of surrounding water’. China Daily quoted Luo Baoming, Party Chief of Hainan Province, ‘The provincial government will be devoted to turning the city into an important base to safeguard China’s sovereignty and serve marine resource development’.

The establishment of Sansha is a step further in consolidating Chinese claims in the region. However, it has led to protracted tension between China and Southeast Asian nations, especially Vietnam and the Philippines. This particular move has questioned the international legitimacy of China’s path of peaceful development and its good neighbourly policy in the region. In quest of its irredentist impulse, China is providing an opportunity to an external power like the US to play a role in the region. 

Moves like this are adding to the anxiety of the claimants in the region, and has taken the dispute to new heights. Vietnam calls the Sansha Island ‘Phu Lam’ and considers the Chinese takeover a violation of international law. The Philippines does not recognise the city or its jurisdiction. The US, concerned about this unilateral move in the SCS, feels the need for collective diplomacy to resolve competing claims. However, in the absence of any cooperative mechanism in the region, the establishment of Sansha can indicate troubled waters ahead.

 
Article by same Author
China and Latin America: Quest for Energy Security

India and China: What did the Salman Khurshid and Li Keqiang Visits Achieve?

China: Engaging Nepal as a Land Port

China: Contextualising the Anti-Access Area-Denial Strategy

China and the Asia-Pacific: Trends, Challenges and Dilemmas

Second Sino- Indian Strategic Economic Dialogue: A SWOT Analysis

China: Reasons for being a Top FDI Destination

IPCS Discussion: Sino-Indian and Sino-South Korean Relations

IPCS Discussion: China's Role in North Korea's Stability and Regional Security

Yang Yechi in Southeast Asia: A fruitful Visit?

Sino-Bhutan Relations: Implications for Indian Security

Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO): The Indian Standpoint

The Curious Case of India’s Withdrawal from the South China Sea

Seoul Nuclear Security Summit 2012: An Analysis of China’s Position

Iranian Embargo: China’s Options

China and Thailand: Analyzing Xi Jinping’s Visit

Chinese Troops in Seychelles: An Analysis

China’s New Rural Poverty Line: An Insight

The South China Sea: Likely Outcomes

Revisiting Confucius

Cultures of China : An Exposition

Chinese Economy: Inflation on the Rise and Manufacturing on the Wane

Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway: Strategic Significance

China, the Philippines and Vietnam: Conflicting Claims in the South China Sea

China-Vietnam Friction: The South China Sea Factor

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2013, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com