Home Contact Us  
   

US & South Asia - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4196, 28 November 2013
 
Iran Nuclear Deal: American Re-Entry into the Middle East?
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
Chairperson, Canadian, US & Latin American Studies, JNU
 

What does the Iran nuclear deal mean for American policy towards Tehran and the rest of the Middle East?
Iran Nuclear Deal: Winners and Losers
The Geneva Agreement, signalling an American-Iranian détente, has created winners and losers. Currently, the Obama administration can claim diplomatic victory in compelling Iran to negotiate an agreement that would make its nuclear installations open to intrusive verification, limit its uranium enrichment and even halt a reactor that could produce plutonium. There is little doubt that the severe and comprehensive sanctions led by the US achieved its goal. The large reduction in Iran’s energy exports, rapidly falling value of its currency, difficulty of conducting trade due to banking restriction,s and high inflation accompanied by rising unemployment induced Iran to end its nuclear defiance and offer transparency in its nuclear activities. 
It was a big diplomatic gain for President Obama in the backdrop of his inability to play a leadership role in handling the Syrian issue, which made Russian President Vladimir Putin look like a great world statesman. However, Obama’s triumph on this issue seems to be Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu’s nightmare.
Israel left no stone unturned to prevent a Western deal with Iran. When the Obama administration appeared determined to make compromises, the Israeli lobby in Washington became hyperactive in the corridors of the US Congress. Tel Aviv sought to neutralise Obama’s initiatives by trying to get Canada and France to act tough.
What the US realised was that sanctions had not been effective in bringing Tehran to its knees. Iran continued to build its conventional military capability, refused to refrain from supporting the Assad regime in Syria, continued to fund the Hamas and Hezbollah forces, and even set up front companies to manage international trade to some extent. There was no alternative but to accept Iran’s legitimate right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme. 
Ironically, Saudi Arabia and other Arab regimes in the Persian Gulf were on the same page with Israel on the Iranian nuclear issue and Syrian chemical weapons issue. Riyadh, like Tel Aviv, expressed anger, disappointment and later frustration over the emerging Washington-Tehran détente. 
There appears to be considerable apprehension among Israeli and Arab strategic analysts that Iran’s success in retaining its nuclear programme, returning to its normal energy trading activities, and détente with the US will make Iran a powerful regional heavyweight. 
The happier group of winners in this diplomatic ballgame, however, consists of countries that have an energy stake in Iran, including India. While the US seems to be on its way to acquire energy independence, the rest of the world would continue to seek a peaceful Persian Gulf and a stable energy market.  
 
Similarities with Indo-US Nuclear Deal?
The nuclear deal between the US and Iran concluded in Geneva is markedly different from the Indo-US nuclear deal. First of all, the US deal with India was a solely bilateral one, while Iran had to negotiate with six countries. 
Secondly, Iran has agreed to verifiably undertake a civilian nuclear programme and refrain from activities that may enable it to make nuclear weapons. India, on the other hand, managed to retain its nuclear weapons and concurrently resume nuclear trade with other countries to pursue civilian nuclear activities.  
 
Thirdly, the US Congress overwhelmingly supported the US administration to promote civilian nuclear cooperation with India, while the Republican leadership has condemned President Obama’s overtures towards Iran. He has been criticised as a modern-day Neville Chamberlain, and the Geneva agreement has been described as worse than the Munich agreement.
Finally, Washington struck deal with New Delhi years after India conducted a series of nuclear tests and became a de facto nuclear weapons power. The 123 agreement was the final culmination of the end of American nuclear sanctions against India. In the case of Iran, the nuclear deal was made to prevent Iran’s emergence as a nuclear weapons power. Unlike India, Iran yielded to the US-led sanctions regime.
 
However, there are certain similarities between the two nuclear deals as far as their regional implications are concerned. China and Pakistan unfavourably reacted to the Indo-US nuclear deal, and Israel and Saudi Arabia are opposed to or critical of the Iranian nuclear deal.
Secondly, as in the case of India, Iran-US relations may soon witness a paradigm shift. Once nuclear differences are over, bilateral relations between the two countries are likely to move into an optimistic trajectory. The establishment of a ‘strategic partnership’ between Washington and Tehran may result from a successful final agreement, and may be expected in about a year’s time.  
Thirdly, expansion of US-Indian relations since the signing of the 123 agreement has altered the geopolitical map of the Indo-Pacific region. Most likely, the geopolitical map of the Middle East will be redrawn after an agreement is in place, one that would allow Iran to generate electricity from nuclear power but verifiably prevent it from developing nuclear weapons.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Ruhee Neog and Ayesha Khanyari,
"Iran Nuclear Deal: Israeli and Saudi Arabian Objections," 31 December 2013
Rajeev Agarwal,
"Iran Nuclear Deal: Why would Iran want to Weaponise?," 13 December 2013
Ayesha Khanyari,
"Iran Nuclear Deal," 9 December 2013
D Suba Chandran,
"Iran Nuclear Deal: Regional Implications," 28 November 2013
Ayesha Khanyari,
"Iran Nuclear Deal: End of Cold War against the West?," 26 November 2013
Ruhee Neog,
"Iran Nuclear Deal: A Definite Breakthrough," 26 November 2013

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China and Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ): Cold Confrontation with the US?

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.