Home Contact Us
Search :
   

Terrorism - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#605, 10 October 2001
 
War on Terrorism: Coalition Sans Commitment
Maj. Gen. Yashwant Deva (Retd)
 

The grand alliance that the US has rigged up to shadow box terrorism is a collage of disparate interests with a marked absence of commitment to the cause. It smacks more of crass opportunism rather than a willing cooperation to take on the evil of naked terror. 

Every country that has promised to go along with America has done so for a price –something in return for the active or passive efforts that they may make in pursuance of anti–terrorism agenda. Even the US, for all its rhetoric, is looking at the problem in the narrow ambit of its own interests. In their rabidity to assemble a coalition against Osama bin Laden, the Americans have sacrificed their avowed commitments to root out globally the evil of terror. 

The Arabs have laid down their own conditions, seeking more active role for the US in the Middle East in meeting the Palestinian aspirations. Musharaff has made the best of adversity and cunningly extracted a pound of flesh that interalia includes the end of sanctions, debt relief, millions of dollars in aid for refugees, a role in post-Taliban dispensation and above all legitimacy for the regime.  One marvels at his balancing acumen of realpolitik with faith, and ingenuity at image building, media manipulation and of course, India baiting, in which he excels par excellence. 

When it came to terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), the US administration has made it abundantly clear to India that its priorities lie elsewhere. Its harp on phasing the operations is neither ethical nor pragmatic, particularly in view of the overwhelming evidence of involvement of the notorious terrorist Masood Azhar, of hijack fame and the founder of Jaish e Mohammed (JeM) with spider web of connections on the money trail. Washington has yet to give a convincing proof of bin Laden’s involvement, on the other hand, JeM has owned the responsibility cocking a snook and daring the civilized. Whereas India has fallen head over heels in its unqualified support to the US, convincingly construed by its detractors as abject placation, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has been blunt to the point of effrontery, admonishing Washington, “Do not try to appease the Arabs at our expense.” 

Like India, Russia too stands vindicated. Chechnya and J&K were proving grounds for “Jihad” – a prologue to WTC. Russians however are far from being naïve. It is apparent that they have bargained prudently. Criticism of Chechnya has been muted, even doings legitimized in what was earlier denounced as “atrocities”. Besides, Russians could now bank on Western help in developing their economy and infrastructure. 

China has joined the coalition because it perceives an opportunity to put down Muslim insurgency in the western region of Xinjiang province. China prefers to go alone and eschew publicity to its efforts. It is believed that after the attack on America, China quietly intensified counter insurgency operations and executed at least seven persons and arrested dozens more. In other times the US would have been leading China badgers in crying foul and would have called it yet another evidence of repression a la Tiananmen Square. Following Jiang Zemin’s offer of condolences and support to Bush, a Chinese foreign office spokesman sought quid pro quo in dealing with Uighur separatists and independence seekers in Tibet and Taiwan. 

Japan has shed its pretence and is willing to provide logistic support to the US, its scope undefined. Ironically the Japanese are questioning the status of their own military which was relegated after World War II. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has increased diplomatic efforts in backing the coalition with visits to China and South Korea. Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country has given the endorsement to America’s war on terrorism in return for an aid package worth $600 million. Malaysia, Thailand and Philippines have likewise tried to balance economic and diplomatic pressures with internal fissures and threats from the extremists. 

There is a lesson for us. The asymmetric attacks on the most powerful nation in the world has shown how tenuous the world order is and how skin deep is the commitment to coalition. Let us therefore stand on our own and not look elsewhere to fight our wars against violence and terror. Besides, there is no virtue in being taken for granted. 

 
Article by same Author
Cease Fire, Not Vigilance

Dirty Bomb: A Scoop or a Hoax

Terror Hunt: Hounding With Biometrics

Terror Hunt: Warehousing and Mining Data

Tools of Terror: The Art and Science of Steganography

Genes Warfare: The Dreaded Possibilty Coming True

Surfing for Intelligence

Psyint Analysis: Profiling Eelam Tigers

On A Mission To Learn From Others

Jaffna: Action Replay

Psychotronic Terrorism: Digital hacking of the human brain

Review of Kargil Operations: Media Goes to Battle

Lessons from Kargil: Relearn the Art of Patrolling

Wake-up Call: India's cyberspace is under attack

Of Tapes and Tapping Technical intelligence scores over human intelligence

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2013, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com