Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Terrorism - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#600, 9 October 2002
 
Terror in America: US Military Options
PR Chari
Director, IPCS
 

The United States will never be the same after Black Tuesday; its sense of invulnerability, sheltering between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans , has disappeared after the World Trade Centre towers in New York and the Pentagon in Washington were attacked. They were/are the symbols of American economic and military power. Had the airplane that crashed in Pennsylvania succeeded in attacking the White House, the symbol of American political power would also have been assaulted.

 

 

We share the grief at the fate of innocents killed and maimed in these attacks. Terrorism is part theatre, theatre of the macabre if you will, designed to focus attention of the intended audience – the global community in this case – to the terrorist’s cause. And what could that cause be apart from highlighting the vulnerability of the American homeland? All of America ’s wars in the last century were fought on foreign soil; whilst it accepted the economic costs and the deaths of its soldiers in those wars, the horrors of conflict occurred elsewhere, in Europe and Asia and Africa and Latin America . The United States remained inviolate until Black Tuesday. The psychological dimension of this rude awakening cannot be underestimated. It has created a heightened sense of insecurity in the American government, a fear of crowded places and air transportation afflicts its people. A hint of xenophobia is also creeping in with citizens having stereotypical features of Arabs and Muslims being singled out for attack. This feeling could increase as the economic downturn in the United States gains momentum with falling car sales and rising layoffs adding to the recessionary trends already visible in the American economy before Black Tuesday occurred.

 

 

The immediate response of the Bush administration to assuage the enormous sense of outrage in the American people is understandable. Osama Bin Laden was identified as the hate object, and the Al Qaeda organization as the instrument of his malevolence; the Taleban was targeted as his patron. No thought was given to the root causes underlying the phenomenon of Osama Bin Laden, his acceptance in the Muslim world, and ability to enlist large numbers of recruits willing to sacrifice their lives. They cannot be dismissed as religious fanatics. The Bush administration should reflect on the desperation imbuing these suicide squads of Osama Bin Laden. Why is this happening? Could it be the result of the unilateralism of the United States in the last decade? Has its bombing of Iraq , attacks on Sudan and Afghanistan created this sense of hopelessness and desperation?

 

 

These events placed Pakistan in the difficult position of either supporting its creation, the Taleban and, by extension, the Taleban’s actions in providing sanctuary to Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan . The alternative of supporting the Taleban and obstructing the US would have proved extremely costly in political and economic terms, given Pakistan ’s isolation in the world and its staggering economy. Naturally Pakistan is seeking to gain as much as it can out of the American compulsion to capture Osama Bin Laden “dead or alive”; so it has abandoned, temporarily at least, the Taleban, al Qaeda, and Osama Bin Laden to support the Americans.

 

 

The US military response is still evolving. Aircraft carriers have been moved into the northern Indian Ocean , and aircraft positioned in the Gulf region; they are poised to launch air and missile strikes on Afghanistan over-flying Pakistani territory. Both US Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld and British Prime Minister Blair, are touring the region to strengthen political support for the coalition’s military action against Afghanistan . But, what shape and form could that take?

 

 

The most desirable outcome would be for the Taleban to deliver Osama Bin Laden “dead or alive”. So far Pakistan has been unable to deliver. Whether this will happen in future is uncertain, but the Pathan adage is worth recollecting, “every head has its price”. A variant would be for the Northern Alliance to undertake this enterprise. Ironically, the erstwhile combatants in Afghanistan , the United States and Russia , are cooperating in this venture. The next best option would be for the coalition forces to undertake a “surgical operation”, by a missile or bomb attack to kill Osama Bin Laden. Or capture or kill him in a commando operation. The problem would be to acquire pinpoint information about Osama’s whereabouts; this would be very difficult given the nature of the Afghan terrain. The worst possible option would be bombing of locations in which he is suspected to be hiding – the collateral damage to its population, already suffering the ravages of starvation would alienate world opinion. The creation of larger numbers of desperate people who willingly contemplate suicide attacks can hardly be the end objective of US policy.

 

 

What then can or will the coalition forces do in the coming days? The world waits and watches. 

 

 
Article by same Author
Agni V: What is its Strategic Significance?

The Seoul Nuclear Security Summit: Discovering an Agenda

North Korea and Iran: A Study in Contrasts

Analyzing 2011: Prognosticating 2012

Parsing the Addu Declaration

Anna Hazare: Ex Fast Facto

US-Pakistan-India Equations Post-Obama

Anna Hazare and his Times

Pakistan's Strategic Stability

K.Subrahmanyam

FMCT Negotiations: Games Pakistan Plays

The Commonwealth Games and the Commonwealth – Still Relevant?

Civil Nuclear Liability: Fact and Fiction

Remembering Gandhi (M.K.)

The Security Issue of Land: Industrialization vs Displacement

Biological Weapons: the Neglected WMD

Non-Proliferation: What Can India Do?

Nuclear Dealing Wheeling

The Upcoming NPT Review Conference: Prospects

Modular Nuclear Reactors: Solution or Problem?

Waiting for the NSA

China at 60 - Sino-Indian Tensions

Pokharan II: The Incestuous Debate

Reducing Strategic Arms : From Prague to L'Aquila via Moscow

Release Authority: Who Will Press The Button?

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet