Home Contact Us  
   

Terrorism - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#590, 27 September 2001
 
Pakistan’s Response to America’s War against Terrorism
Chintamani Mahapatra
Jawaharlal Nehru University
 

As terrorism struck the symbol of power – the Pentagon, and the symbol of wealth – the World Trade Centre, in Washington DC and New York on September 11, it heralded a new type of war in the 21st century between democracies and terrorist outfits.

 

 

However, democracies can easily be identified but not terrorism, which does not represent a country, nor an individual or a group. One man’s terrorist is someone else’s freedom fighter. Thus all democracies may not unite in a war against terrorism. Non-democracies may also not cooperate in the war against terrorism, especially when some of them have been promoting terrorism themselves. Pakistan is a quintessential example. But they may have to be pressurized to play ball. This is what the Bush White House has done. It came up with a set of demands and asked Pakistan to spell out whether it is with the US or the terrorist outfits.

 

 

Pakistan , which has aided, abetted, trained and equipped the terrorist groups involved in atrocities in Kashmir , has only paid lip service to the dead in the recent terrorist attacks against America . President Pervez Musharraf had declared “unstinted support†to the US fight against terrorism, but when the Bush Administration actually sought Islamabad ’s assistance, he asked for more time to take a decision.

 

 

Pakistan has been a long-standing ally of the US . It assisted the US during the prolonged warfare in Afghanistan in the 1980s. It also offered its support during the Gulf War. But in a war, which has taken a toll of thousands of American lives and has cost that country billions of dollars in financial losses, Musharraf wanted more time to decide. The Pakistani hesitation derived from its years of involvement in promoting terrorism in its neighbourhood as well as distant place, such as Chechnya . Siding with the US would mean creating enemies among the terrorist groups. It would also lead to destruction of Pakistan ’s own creation – the Taliban Government in Afghanistan . Denying cooperation could lead to retaliatory US action against terrorist hideouts and training camps in Pakistan , and its further isolation in the international community.

 

 

The military government in Islamabad found, after deliberations, that antagonizing the injured lion – the United States – would be more costly to Pakistan . It would increase Pakistan ’s international isolation, make the terrorist training camps in Pakistan a target of US retaliatory attacks, turn the country into a bankrupt nuclear power and, more significantly, bring India and the US closer together. Sandwiched between the devil and the deep blue sea, Pervez Musharraf, in a televised address, sought to promise different things to different constituencies. He promised all assistance to the US . He told his people that the struggle for Kashmir would continue and siding with the US at this juncture would facilitate that struggle. He told the Islamic hard-liners that he was joining the war against terrorism and not Islam. He also sent an indirect message to New Delhi that it was Pakistan , and not India , which could best serve as a frontline state in America ’s wars.

 

 

Bush was apparently pleased with Musharaff’s “bold speechâ€Â. But he knew that Pakistan ’s help was needed, not because of that country’s strategic location but because of its Islamic credentials. The war against terrorism would not be like the war against the Soviet troops in Afghanistan . The US would not require a conduit. It would need the support of Islamic countries to tell Muslims around the world that America ’s war is against terrorism and not Islam. Given Pakistan ’s close links with the Taliban Government, it could become the frontline Islamic State in the war against terrorism.

 

 

While the military ruler could please the US President, the supporters of the Taliban and Saudi dissident Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan were not impressed by Musharraf’s argument. Quite a few military officers in his own junta remained unconvinced as well. The Afghan opposition leaders of the Northern Alliance have asked the US not to believe the Pakistanis. The Taliban has vowed to wage war against those who support US military action against the Taliban. India must remain resolute in its own war against cross-border terrorism.

 

 

It remains to be seen how the US would fight an expected long drawn out war against terrorism without disrupting the links between terrorists and those who harbour them. It also remains to be seen how Islamabad fights one kind of terrorism but promotes another. 

 

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
India-US: Convergences and Divergences

100 Days in Office: The Trump Administration

Forecast 2017: India-US Strategic Partnership

Paradigm Shift or Business As Usual: Trump’s China Policy

American Turbulence: Global Ramifications

Trump's Nuclear Policy: Global Implications

Critical Challenges to the Indo-US Strategic Partnership

India and the US: Inching Towards an Informal Alliance

Need the World Worry over Trump's Foreign Policy?

US: Losing Respect Abroad

Implications of Modis US Visit

Forecast 2016: Difficult Days Ahead for Washington

India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet

Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?

Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticisms Sake?

Changing Global Balance of Power: Obamas Response

Obama Administration: Re-engaging India

US in South Asia: Declining Influence

US Foreign Policy: Rehashing Old Stances

US Frantic Effort to Make the Rebalancing Strategy Work

US, Ukraine and the End of Unipolarity

US-China Cold Confrontation: New Paradigm of Asian Security

US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?

Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow

Pakistans Role in War against Terrorism: Costs and Benefits

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.