Home Contact Us
Search :

Terrorism - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2765, 25 December 2008
Aerial Security Against Terror Attacks
M Shamsur Rabb Khan
e-mail: samsur.khan@gmail.com

In the wake of devastating terror attacks on Mumbai last month, Defence Minister A K Antony warned the armed forces of possible terror attacks from airborne platforms, similar to the 9/11 attacks in the US. At a meeting with the three Services Chiefs on 2 December 2008, Antony called for greater coordination between all security and intelligence agencies, so as to make the intelligence inputs actionable. Given the kind of novel mechanisms and strategies that terrorist organizations have devised to attack India in recent years, there is an urgent need to renew India's focus on aerial security. However, amidst growing dangers of aerial terror attacks, holes in the state's aerial security mechanism are palpably obvious.

In October 2008, the Comptroller and Auditor General's report revealed serious lapses in the air defense network, because of inadequate and outdated radar surveillance systems operated by the Indian Air Force (IAF). The report pointed out that the Defence Ministry could not ensure the timely acquisition of three additional high power static radars to provide effective air surveillance over certain sensitive areas. It also revealed that India faces a 47 per cent shortage of radars needed to detect aircraft.

The shortage of radars is a serious shortcoming in view of the significant changes in the security scenario, especially the growing magnitude of potential aerial threats, in terms of sophistication and capability. Depending on ageing MiG-21s for aerial combat, the air force lacks the teeth to mount an adequate air defense for the country. The CAG report is critical of the fact that India's air defense system is based on a model formulated in 1976, which needs an urgent re-look. Even the missile firing capabilities, the report says, are not up to the mark and that the 'watch hours' prescribed by the Government to maintain external surveillance are not being met by the IAF.

Since air defense is critical to India's security, the country is in urgent need of an adequate number of surveillance radars for providing efficient and reliable detection capabilities in the sky. Significantly, an in-depth analysis of India's Air Defence Ground Environment System (ADGES) also shows that the number and type of radars in possession of the IAF is not good enough to cover the entire country. Hence, it has highlighted the need for an immediate upgradation of ADGES, an integrated network of surveillance radars, air defense control centers, and anti- aircraft guns for air and missile bases tasked with the protection of India's vast airspace.

The main objective of aerial security is to safeguard the Indian skies against all types of air attacks, and which includes security at airports to prevent terrorist from hijacking a plane. With terrorists trying novel tricks for executing terror attacks, anti-terror measures need to be focused on a much wider scale. Airport security provides a first line of defence, by attempting to stop the probable terrorists from bringing weapons or explosives into the airport. Monte R Belger of the US Federal Aviation Administration notes, "The goal of aviation security is to prevent harm to aircraft, passengers, and crew, as well as support national security and counter-terrorism policy". Airport security mechanisms must be quick, efficient, and effective, especially given the rise in the number of travellers. For aerial security in India, safeguarding of airports is one major area of focus, since terrorist threats and narcotics are the main threats in Indian airports. Another problem that some airports face is the proliferation of slums around the airport boundaries, such as in Mumbai.

India stepped up its airport security after the 1999 Kandahar hijacking, by deploying the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) to form an Airport Security Group, to protect Indian airports. Since then, every airport has been given an Airport Security Unit (APSU), a trained unit to counter unlawful interference with civil aviation. In addition to the CISF, every airline has an aviation security force as a separate department. Israel is a good example as far as implementation of airport and aerial security is concerned - it is widely agreed that El Al is the safest airline in the world, as there has not been a hijacking of an El Al plane since 23 July 1969, and no plane departing from Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv has ever been hijacked. At a conference in May 2008, US Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff pointed out that the US will seek to adopt some of the Israeli security measures at its domestic airports. India can seek help from Israeli's who are touted as being "are legendary for their security"

In February 2005, civil aviation minister Praful Patel said that security provided by the CISF to 47 Indian airports is even better than the security at US airports and was "more professional and yet personalised." However, since terrorists may infiltrate India through all possible routes, the sky is the one that merits constant surveillance, as an aerial bombing on vital installations, including nuclear ones, would be devastating, and they are exposed to a serious damaging vulnerability. It is high time the government gave top priority to aerial security.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
The Killing of Shahzad: Links between the al Qaeda and the Pakistan Navy in the Open?

India's Contentious 50 Most Wanted Terrorists List

WikiWrecks: 26/11 and US Intent

Sino-Pak N-deal: a Setback to India-China Ties?

Two Summits; Conflicting Messages

David Headley’s Plea Bargain and India-US Relations

Tackling Maoist Terror

The Strategic Significance of Arihant

Enhancing the Credibility of CRPF

Role of Private Sector in Preventing Terror Attacks

Change Has Come to J&K

Hindu Terror: A More Serious Threat

Tackling Terror: Reforms, Not Stringent Laws, Necessary

NSG Waiver: What does it mean for India?

Will the Nuclear Deal Hurt India's Foreign Policy?

Elections in the Himalayan Kingdom: New Dawn of India-Bhutan Relations

Sagarika: A Feather in India's Defense Hat

Securing India's Coastline

Time to Revive India-Iran Relations

Indo-Israel Defence Cooperation: A Step in the Right Direction

Poor Policing and Weak Intelligence Gathering

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com