Home Contact Us
Search :

Sri Lanka - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2826, 9 March 2009
For a Pro-active Indian Policy on Sri Lanka
Leslie Keerthi Kumar SM
Research Scholar, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
e-mail: lesliekkumar@gmail.com

Ever since the Tamil nationalist struggle for a separate homeland in Sri Lanka started, there have been apprehensions in New Delhi about the spreading of such a movement into its own province of Tamil Nadu. These apprehensions are well founded as nationalisms do not respect international borders and have a tendency to spread. Hence the Indian Government has supported all along a unitary Sri Lanka within the constitutional framework. However, during the 1980s emotions were running high in Tamil Nadu and it is a matter of fact that many LTTE camps were operating out of Tamil Nadu with the Eelam cause enjoying widespread support among the locals.

All that changed sharply in the 1990s with the LTTE’s assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. The LTTE was banned in India and local support dried up as the Tamils of India lost their trust and interest in the LTTE in particular and the Eelam in general. Also, the economic transformation of Tamil Nadu created a large group of upwardly mobile Tamils who were least interested in what was happening to their Sri Lankan cousins. Meanwhile, in the late 1990s, the LTTE made some significant territorial gains and in the early 2000s even tried to engage in peace talks aided by Norway. The coming to power in Colombo of Mahinda Rajapakse’s nationalist government altered the situation. Even for this, the LTTE has only itself to blame as it had suppressed Tamil voter turnout thereby aiding the victory of the hard-line Rajapakse. LTTE supreme Prabhakaran probably thought that his outfit could win the struggle through its firepower alone. It was a costly miscalculation. Rajapakse’s war against the LTTE is now in its final stage and it does appear that the LTTE would be destroyed. 

Is this for India’s good? Some seem to think so, as they consider that the LTTE will die and along with it will also vanish the Tamil nationalist movement and any separatist tendency within India. Has this been the case? Tamil nationalist emotions are running high again, much like in the 1980s. Students, lawyers and others have come out in protest with every political party obliged to stage protests on the Sri Lankan issue. A significant number of people, though definitely not the majority, are openly supporting the LTTE again and their ranks are growing day by day. Many are angry with New Delhi for being a bystander. The tremendous civilian cost of the Sri Lankan government’s war has reignited the nationalist sentiments of the Tamils. 

India could have done without these developments. However, one may ask what could India have done differently?. By allowing the Sri Lankan government a free hand, it is giving the impression to the people of Tamil Nadu that it is insensitive to their concerns. This is detrimental to India’s own internal cohesiveness. No responsible government can support the LTTE but India should have sought the preservation of the pre-war status quo in Sri Lanka and pushed for a solution to the crisis within the Sri Lankan constitution using its influence with Colombo. This should have been done two years ago when the Sri Lankan government was just starting its war against the LTTE. Instead, the Indian government aided the war efforts of Sri Lanka and it appears that it did not anticipate the ramifications of such a war on the Tamils of India. 

All talk about non-interference in Sri Lankan affairs is fine as rhetoric but in international relations, if its interests are at stake, a country needs to engage. India needs to learn a lesson or two from countries like US and China. A state does not get to choose its neighbors or wish away their problems but has to deal with them the best it can. If not then it cannot prevent the flow of consequences into its own territory which is exactly what is happening now. 

The time is still not past. Now that the LTTE is gone as a potent political force, India should actively pressurize the Sri Lankan government to devolve powers and give political autonomy to its Tamil population within a unitary Sri Lankan framework. Sri Lanka has a long history of denying political rights to its minority Tamil population and this time around with no Tamil counterweight like the LTTE to check it, it is unlikely that it will devolve powers on its own. India will do well to fill the void left by LTTE, else, someone else will. In a worst case scenario, the LTTE may even be replaced by another and worse terror group with a pan-Tamil ideology. Israel worked hard to get Arafat to fail and eventually got Hamas as the replacement. On the other hand, by playing a constructive and assertive role in the post-LTTE scenario, India can win back the hearts of many disillusioned Tamils. 

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
J Jeganaathan,
"Rule of Law or Law of the Ruler?: India’s Stand on Sri Lanka," 18 June 2011
Sandeep Bhardwaj,
"Recent Developments in Sri Lanka: Implications for India," 9 March 2009

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com