Home Contact Us  

Sri Lanka - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2900, 4 July 2009
15th Lok Sabha's Verdict : Erosion of Naxal Base in Bihar
Satish Kumar
Sr.Lecturer, MMH College, Ghaziabad

The fifteenth Lok Sabha elections proved to be a trend setter in many ways, foremost being a clear mandate for political stability alongside a rejection of the bullet in favor of the ballot. In Bihar particularly, apart from the defeat of a majority of the criminals, which signals a preference for development over caste affiliations, another significant development in these elections was the weakening of the political and social base of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (CPI-ML). The CPI-ML, the largest communist party in Bihar, had a support base in at least 11 of the state's 38 districts, including Bhojpur, Buxar, Jahanabad, Sasaram, Gaya, Siwan, Gopalganj, Maharajganj and Jamui. The CPI-ML had joined hands with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) to put up candidates for 33 of the state's 40 Lok Sabha seats in an attempt to mark its presence from the state in the 15th Lok Sabha. The CPI (M-L) was an underground organization until 1992 because it had taken the path of armed struggle, which it later gave up. But combinations of these various communist organizations failed to win even a single Lok Sabha seat in Bihar.  Even Ara seat, which was won by CPI-ML in 1989, was snatched by the Janata Dal-United. Many reasons can be given for the decline of the social and political base of the Maoist groups in Bihar.

First, the CPI-ML had earlier been supported by the Dalits, Koeris, and other backward castes; hence it managed to win seven seats in the State Legislature in 2005. But four years of the Nitish government in Bihar changed the election rules. It eroded the political base of CPI-ML. The entry of the BSP in Bihar has also reduced its Dalit support. Maoist groups are violent and anti-development. The vote bank of the Maoist organizations in Bihar has not changed, but many splits and mergers in these organizations have occurred. The CPI CPI-M’s vote bank has eroded due to its alliance with the CPI-ML. People in Bihar are looking for a new social cohesiveness. Communist parties went very soft on the political mismanagement of Lalu Raj, which resulted in their decline. The CPI-ML failed to lure back its traditional vote bank of Dalits and Muslims. 

Second, the Maoist groups face a dilemma. Their stand vacillates from bullet to ballot. The CPI (Maoist) was formed in 2004 by merging the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), the People's War Group (PWG) and the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC). The CPI (Maoist) is a part political, part insurgent and part terrorist organization. It believes in the Maoist strategy of capturing political power using a motivated and -trained army of the impoverished rural masses.

Third, violence during the elections and killing of innocent officials is disapproved by the larger sections of the society. Maoist groups attacked in Gaya, Aurangabad and Motihari and in each election, they cynically used violence against innocent people to create a fear psychosis against casting votes. In the four decades since the first Maoist call for electoral boycott of democratic politics, the electoral processes have got deeply entrenched in the minds of people. Their calls for boycott of elections have been ignored. People show faith in the new initiatives of the Central and State governments. NREGA and other economic initiatives have linked the weaker sections of society with the state structures. Naxal outfits often target these structures. This does not go well with poor people. There is a general perception throughout Bihar, especially in the Dalit Bastia of the Naxal affected districts, that the minimum 100 days job security has changed the views of Naxal sympathizers, and renewed hopes in the government’s initiatives. 

There is a clear message emerging out of the 15th Lok Sabha. Change your ways or leave the state. The Nitish formula has been very successful. Bihar is one of the most backward states in terms of human development. The social life in Bihar revolves around its villages. Data from the National Sample Survey Organization, (NASO), informs that around 90 percent of its population resides in villages. Over half the population is illiterate.  Over three fourths of people secure their livelihood from agriculture and allied activities. Agriculture, on which the people of Bihar are excessively dependent in comparison to other states, is not in good shape. Ownership of landholdings is skewed. In 2003-04 about 30% of the rural households had no land to cultivate. Bihar ranks second among Indian states in terms of proportion of population below the poverty line. Bihar needs a leader who delivers. The Nitish government is the best suited for Bihar. 15 years of Lalu Raj cultivated jungle raj. It promoted Naxalites and anti-Naxal groups like the Ranveer Sena. Anti-Naxal groups have lost its appeal in the changed socio-political structure. The Maoist groups are also on the verge of losing their political base in Bihar.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Demoralized Police Force and Naxalism in Bihar

Social Entrepreneurs: Silent Killer of Naxal Forces in Bihar

How Anti-Naxal Forces Weakened in Bihar

Naxalism in Decline in Bihar

Changing Face of the Naxalites in Bihar: From Homelessness to Real Estate

Rapprochement with Nepal: India's Security Concerns

Pakistan's 'Great Game' in Central Asia

How Did Bangladesh Become an Epicenter of Islamic Terrorism?

India and WTO: Some Critical Concerns

Myanmar: Contending hegemonies between India and China

Nuclearisation of Tibetan Plateau and its Implications for India

India Between America and Russia: Need to Tilt Towards U.S.

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February  March
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.