In
the situation prevailing in Manipur, the armed forces believe that they require
tough legal provisions to combat the separatists and restore a semblance of
order. The security forces in Manipur are tasked primarily to carry out
counter-insurgency operations. The Armed Forces (Assam & Manipur) Special Powers
Act, 1958 gives them sweeping powers to deal with the ‘enemy’.
This
legislation has been in force in Manipur since 1980, and empowers “any
commissioned officer, warrant officer, non-commissioned officer, or any other
person of equivalent rank in the armed forces,†in a disturbed area to either
open fire, arrest or conduct search operations “without warrant†for
“maintenance of public order.†Simply put, the Act provides for an Army soldier
from the rank of a havildar onwards with the power to shoot and kill a
person should the security force personnel be ‘convinced’ that this ultimate
step is needed to control the situation.
One
can argue for and against this Act. What is important to analyse is whether
application of this tough anti-terror law in Manipur has succeeded in containing
insurgency, or whether its use has been counterproductive. One needs to assess
whether this Act and its use by the security forces have been actually making it
easy for the insurgent groups to mobilize the masses by getting them out onto
the streets to raise their voice against the security forces and the Indian
State. For instance, on 15 July, a group of 40 Manipuri women shocked the nation
by taking recourse to an unheard of form of protest in Imphal standing naked in
front of the paramilitary Assam Rifles’ Sector 9 headquarters. They were
demonstrating against the alleged death in custody of Thangjam Monorama Devi,
which led to snowballing violence, with protesters defying curfew, clashing with
the police and setting fire to government offices.
If
reports are to be believed, Thangjam Manorama died in custody. Even if she
actually was a PLA militant, the question remains whether the security forces
were justified in killing. The answer obviously is no. Some reports in the media
quoted Assam Rifles officials as claiming that she was shot when she “tried to
flee on the pretext of responding to the call of nature.†This is a rather
unconvincing explanation as the well-trained troops could easily have given
chase and overpowered an unarmed woman who was in their custody.
Student
and prominent civil society groups in the frontier State have been pressing for
withdrawal of this ‘black law’ from Manipur. Neither the State Government nor
the Centre has shown any sign of conceding their demands. Quite often, the
Manipuris have been taking to the streets to vent their anger against this law.
The latest turn of events has once again pushed the authorities to the wall. A
beleaguered State Government has ordered a judicial probe, while the Assam
Rifles has also instituted a court of enquiry. Meanwhile, the Assam Rifles
contingent that was allegedly involved in picking up Manorama has been taken off
active duty.
Manipur
has as many as 17 active rebel groups and, despite this Act being in force, the
insurgents are having a field day. In 2003, as many as 196 people were killed in
insurgency-related violence in the State. Between January and June 2004, a total
of 114 persons have been killed in similar circumstances in Manipur. In the
light of these statistics, one wonders whether New Delhi would do well to
withdraw the Act from Manipur. The Centre’s moves are awaited, but New Delhi
appears to be out to placate the Manipuris by announcing that the Assam Rifles
would move out of the historic Kangla Fort in Imphal to a new location. This has
been a longstanding demand of local groups. Whether New Delhi will withdraw the
Act is another matter.
There
can be no two opinions that insurgency has to be put down with a firm hand and
the rebels must respond to New Delhi’s repeated offers for peace talks. But,
while combating the rebels, one needs to calculate whether the methods used and
legal provisions taken recourse to are really effective in dealing with this
situation. In Assam, for instance, violence by insurgents has come down to a
great extent without the troops using or seeking to use the Armed Forces (Assam
& Manipur) Special Powers Act.