Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Jammu & Kashmir - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#402, 7 August 2000
 
Recent Developments in Kashmir – II: Hizbul Cease-fire - Implications
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

With the Hizbul Mujahideen (HuM), the most powerful militant outfit in Kashmir announcing a cease-fire for three months and the Indian government also responding to it positively, what are the implications of this latest development? 

 

 

A major implication will be on the law and order situation in Kashmir . In the long run, the cease-fire is bound to reduce militant activities in the State. The other militant groups, being comprised, mainly of the foreign elements, needs the support of the local militants for their movement, intelligence and to carryout strikes. The foreign militants also need the support the local people. They may not be willing to help the foreigners and are known to resent their presence. There were many incidents in which the foreign militants abused the local population and the latter in turn have either directly attacked them or informed the Indian security forces about their presence. With the local population being hostile and the HuM deciding to give peace a chance, the other militant groups may not be able to move about freely within the State. This would enable the law and order situation to improve over the long run. Besides, the HuM is more significant than the other groups, as it has at least six “squads” to lay mines and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), whose cadres have been highly trained in the use of explosives. Thus the cease-fire will lead to a decline in number of attacks, and their intensity.

 

 

In the short run, however, there would be an increase in attacks, as the other militant groups have to prove that, despite the HuM’s offer peace will not return to Kashmir . These groups may also increase their attacks on security forces and installations or other communities to increase communal tension and delay the peace process. The August 2 killings, in which nearly 100 people were killed in areas around Pahalgam, Anantnag and Kalaroos, for example, have raised doubts, in this regard. Besides, such attacks are bound to increase the response from the Indian security forces, which could affect any understanding reached between the government and the HuM. 

 

 

Another implication will be on the efforts to start a dialogue between the APHC and the Central government. With the HuM declaring a cease-fire, there is no serious threat from the militant groups to any such dialogue. The APHC also could not force the Centre that any failure in negotiations with it would increase the role of the militants in terms of their activities and the popular support to them. The cease-fire is a golden opportunity to the Centre to hold a dialogue with the APHC, without the militant threat. The Hurriyat leaders understand this reality, which is why they are not happy with the independent announcement by the HuM, without consulting them. In fact, they would have been happy, had the HuM consulted them before announcing the cease-fire, or the APHC announced the HuM’s decision as it would have strengthened their position vis-à-vis Centre.

 

 

Besides, the cease-fire and efforts to initiate the dialogue is bound to undermine the role of Pakistan in Kashmir . Some analysts believe that without the blessings from Pakistan , the HuM would not have announced the cease-fire. Qazi Hussain Ahmad, Chief of the Jamaat-e-Islami, in an interview did not rule out the possibility of Pakistan ’s hand in the cease-fire but it is dubious if Pakistan had any role in the HuM announcement. Pakistan is keeping a low profile, as it could neither support nor oppose the cease-fire, which is apparent from the statements made by different Pakistani officials. It could not oppose the cease-fire as that would earn a bad name for Pakistan among the international community, and affect the image which the Musharraf government. It cannot however support the cease-fire, as it would dent its standing among the various other militant groups. Whether peace will ultimately return to Kashmir without the co-operation of Pakistan is another matter, but the cease-fire will undermine the role of Pakistan in Kashmir .

 

 

Finally, success in the peace process will encourage other militant groups, which are also composed of local Kashmiris having inflence in select pockets of the Valley to enter into the peace process. 

 

 

 

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet