Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Sri Lanka - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#383, 26 June 2000
 
The Other Side of Eelam: A Pandora’s Box?
N Manoharan
Research Officer, IPCS
 

The LTTE has ruled out participation in any peace process to resolve the ethnic crisis within the framework of a united Sri Lanka . The Tigers have resolved not to accept anything less than a separate Eelam.        

 

 

The idea of a separate Tamil state came into being with the passage of the Vadukodai Resolution in 1976 by the Tamil United Liberation Front. Eelam is the ancient Tamil name for Ceylon ; it was adopted to liberate Tamils from the ‘oppressive’ Sinhalese rule based on a “holy trinity”—Land ( Sri Lanka ), Race (Sinhalese) and Faith (Buddhism). It was believed that an independent Tamil state would fulfill the aspirations of Sri Lankan Tamils. Impatient Tamil youth have resorted to violent means to achieve Eelam since the late 1970s; the conflict between the Tamil militants and Sri Lankan Army has been continuing since then.

 

 

What will be the future of an independent Tamil state? Will Eelam be able to survive in the long run? What will be the problems faced by it?

 

 

·                     Firstly, the territorial contiguity of Eelam will pose severe problems. It constitutes as demanded by the Tigers, the northern and eastern provinces of Sri Lanka , which is roughly 40 percent of its land area and 60 per cent of the sea coast. The Muslims in the Amparai district have ruled out joining a separate Tamil state. Eelam has large Sinhalese majority areas. It is also doubtful whether over 40 per cent the Sri Lankan Tamils, settled in the south will migrate to the Jaffna peninsula. Even if they do, they will have to start life afresh, for which opportunities are very limited. 

 

 

·                     Secondly, there is fear that Eelam will be ruled by the LTTE in a fascist and authoritarian manner. There are also possibilities of a civil war breaking out over power sharing, considering the bitter rivalries between various Tamil groups. Jaffna Tamils and Batticaloa Tamils differ in “social organisation, economic activity and cultural practices”. There are Hindus and Christians. There are serious caste cleavages. Though there have never been any clashes, relations between the upper caste Vellalas and lower caste Karaiyars and Mukkuvars have never been cordial.

 

 

·                     Thirdly, the economic viability of the future Eelam is not encouraging. The major area comprising the ‘Tamil homeland’ falls under the arid zone. It was for this reason that many Tamils moved south in the past. One can argue that the future Tamil State could survive on funds that Tigers get from expatriates and through narcotic smuggling. Can the Tamil Eelam become another apex of the ‘Golden Triangle’? 

 

 

·                     Fourthly, what will be the nature of relations between the Eelam and partitioned Sri Lanka ? It is possible that the two entities will slip back over the, when the Tamil and the Sinhalese kingdoms were at war seeking supremacy over each other. Before the integration of the island by the British into a single administrative unit in 1833, no king was content to rule only a part of the island, as it was considered a single contiguous territory by both ethnic groups. In addition to this historical legacy, the deep-rooted Indo-phobia will in come to play. An independent Tamil state will be considered a satellite of India .

 

 

·                     Fifthly, international recognition is important for a modern state to survive in an increasingly interdependent world. The international community does not like any further proliferation of new states. The US was categorical when it asserted that Tamil Eelam would be a “dead planet” without any acknowledgement from the world community. Can a new state afford to take such a risk?

 

 

Appreciating these realities, it would be sagacious for the pro-Eelam proponents to accept greater autonomy with counter guarantees from the world community. Severe sanctions must be placed on the Sri Lankan State in case of any breach of promise on devolution to the Tamils. Had such international support been guaranteed in 1958 (Bandaranaike-Chelvanayagam Pact), Sri Lanka would not be facing the spectre of separatism. What is lacking is not the quantum of devolution or autonomy, but mutual trust. 

 

 

 

 
Article by same Author
IPCS Debate: The UNHRC Resolution on Sri Lanka

Devolution in Sri Lanka: The Latest Take

‘Taming the Tigers’: Reintegration of Surrendered LTTE Cadres

Fishing in Troubled Waters: Indian Fishermen and India-Sri Lanka Relations

Alternative Strategies for Indo-Sri Lankan Relations: Passenger Ferry Service

Sri Lanka: UN Panel and Sovereignty Issues

Sri Lanka: One Year after the War, Where is Ethnic Reconciliation?

Sri Lanka: Why Sustain the ‘State of Exception’?

Upcoming Parliamentary Elections and the Future of Sri Lanka

Challenges Before the President

Ghosts of War Haunt Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka: Clash of ‘War Heroes’

Cross-border Nationalism

Where is the “Northern Spring” in Sri Lanka?

Will the LTTE Rise Again?

Post-LTTE Sri Lanka: Demilitarization as a First Step towards Peace

Post-LTTE: India’s Policy Options on Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Issue

Sri Lanka: Cease the Fire and Catch the Peace

Sri Lanka in 2008: A Tale of Two Fires

The LTTE: 'Determined to Fight, but Ready for Peace'

Eelam War IV: Military Strategies of the LTTE

Eelam War IV: Strategy of the Government of Sri Lanka

Fishing in Troubled Waters: Tamil Nadu Fishermen and India-Sri Lanka Relations

Eastern Provincial Council Elections: A First Step Towards Final Settlement?

Local Polls in Batticaloa: How Significant?

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet