Home Contact Us  
   

South Asia - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3224, 26 August 2010
 
Indus Waters Governance-IV: Don’t Securitize the Water Debate
D Suba Chandran
Deputy Director, IPCS, New Delhi
email: subachandran@gmail.com
 

In recent years, there has been a growing fear that future wars at the global level will be fought over resources. A substantial section in South Asia, especially in Pakistan, believes that the next Indo-Pak war will be fought over the Indus waters. Suddenly, one sees a mushrooming of ‘water wars’ literature during the last decade.

Undoubtedly, there have been problems and crises over water in South Asia between nation-states and within each country at State/Provincial levels. But then, most of these crises have been handled politically. There have not been perfect solutions, but attempts towards an understanding and reconciliation. There are still issues between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, (Indian) Punjab and Haryana, Sindh and (Pakistani) Punjab within India and Pakistan, and at bilateral levels between these two countries. But the negotiations on these issues have not broken down.

On the other hand, there have been success stories as well; the Ganges agreement between India and Bangladesh at the South Asian regional level, and the Mekong River Basin at the international level are great examples of cooperation at bilateral and multilateral levels. Then, where does the ‘water wars’ theory emanate from?

In the last two decades, there has been extra emphasis on ‘securitizing’ bilateral and international issues. From food to environment, every issue has been elevated to a security issue. The concept of security has become elastic and extended itself to include everything in its ambit. Unfortunately, this process has gone too far, and has started trivializing issues instead. In the near future, one is likely to hear (if they have not already) of traffic security, garbage security and so on. As a result of this process, new scholars emerged with new (and possibly damaging) literature, on water cooperation.

Second, in the regional context in South Asia, there has been a deliberate effort, to project water as a security issue. Unfortunately, this could prove to be counter-productive. For example, there are a set of actors, for whom, water is their livelihood. This includes primarily those people who are directly engaged in agriculture and agricultural activities. Then, there are another set of actors, who may also need water for their daily use, but whose livelihoods are not directly dependent on it.

For centuries, the ‘Water Actors’, mainly the farmers, have evolved an understanding and have lived with the other community, irrespective of whether they are upper or lower riparian. Despite occasional problems, they have evolved ways and means to address the water crises – be it floods or drought. Even today, if left up to them, the problem of scarcity or floods would be addressed amicably.

Unfortunately, in South Asia, over the last decade, there has emerged a new wave of ‘Non-Water Actors’ who attempt to monopolize the water debate and hijack it from those who are actually at the receiving end. Media, Security experts, certain social organizations, militant groups, and even cine-actors - have taken the water issue from the farmers, and harp on about it incessantly, regardless of the fact that they are not directly related to the issue. For example, the Tamil cine actors went on a strike demanding water from Karnataka, and certain media publications in Pakistan repeatedly publish factually incorrect stories in the front page accusing India of stealing their waters. Amidst the human calamity in Pakistan today, owing to the floods, a leading national daily, for the last one week  has been trying to drum up support for the building of the Kalabagh dam, by asking people to vote for its referendum!

Such efforts receive wide publicity, thanks to the reach of print and electronic media, which then starts a process, drawing in other non-water actors into the debate. In this mayhem, the original demand and the voice of the water-actors get dissipated. In fact, they may have a better understanding on how to resolve the issue, but they tend to get steadily pushed out to a point where they no longer have a say in the matter, or if they do, they cannot be heard.

This ‘securitization of water debate’ in South Asia, especially in India and Pakistan at the national and bilateral levels, has created a lobby, who then tries to impose their solutions and perceptions as the best one for the water actors. A farmer in Larkana (in Sindh) and in Tanjore (in Tamil Nadu) districts, may have a different problem and a different solution. But then, the securitization of water debate by the media and security experts, has already taken the problem away from the original victim.

The State remains both a silent spectator and an indirect instigator. In certain cases, the State and its institutions are simply inefficient to address the issue; for example, in Pakistan, the failure of WAPDA and the IRSA, has given rise to a set of problems over water sharing, which is now being seized by the non-water actors. In other cases, the States and the provinces, deliberately allow this issue to be taken over, so that they may use this as a bargaining chip in negotiations at the bilateral level between India and Pakistan, or vis-à-vis the federal governments within India and Pakistan.

Securitizing the water debate is a dangerous trend; and unfortunately, this will continue. The State has to arrest this by taking over the debate, and allowing the water actors to be the primary negotiators of the problem.

(This is a part of a series on Indus Waters Governance; forthcoming articles will focus on issues relating to Chashma-Jhelum canal, Greater Thal controversy and Kalabagh dam)

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
D Suba Chandran,
"Indus Waters Governance-V: One River, Three Dialogues," 27 September 2010
D Suba Chandran,
"Indus Waters Governance-III: Keep the IWT away from the Composite Dialogue," 22 July 2010
D Suba Chandran,
"Indus Waters Governance-II: From ‘Letter and Spirit’ to ‘Letter vs Spirit’," 19 July 2010
D Suba Chandran,
"Indus Waters Governance-I: Crisis of Institutions," 15 July 2010

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Will the Genie Want to Go Back?

The Fall of Rajapaksa: Why Democracies Fail Strongmen

Pakistan: The Military Courts

From Kashmir to Kabul

A Fractured Mandate: The Big Picture

And Now, They Are Coming For Our Children

Pak-Afghan Reset: Will the Taliban and al Qaeda follow?

Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues

Rise India, avoid regional pitfalls

Foreign Fighters of Pakistan: Why Pashtuns and Punjabis?

Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?

The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani

Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping: Strong Leaders, Hard Issues

Pakistan: The Coup that didn’t take

Pakistan: Crouching Democrats, Hidden Khakis

Processes at the cost of peace?

Cost of Peace

Rise of Democratic Anarchists

Don’t steal the election now

Mullah Fazlullah: Challenges to the “Eliminate or Extradite” Approach

The Tahirul Qadri Affair

Dhaka as the Gateway to India’s Look East Policy

Modi, Sharif and the Cross-LoC Interactions

Region by Sub-regions

Civil-Military Equations in Pakistan: Que Sera Sera

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.