Home Contact Us  

Peace & Conflict Database - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4438, 14 May 2014

US in Asia Pacific

Rebalancing: China’s Concerns and Responses
Gaurav Kumar Jha
MPhil scholar, School of International Studies, JNU

The US, which is currently winding up its operations from Afghanistan, calls the restructuring and reallocation of its resources towards the Asia Pacific as the ‘Strategy of Rebalancing’, earlier known as the ‘Pivot to East Asia’. China has continuously criticised Washington's deployment of additional ships and personnel to Asia, and the latter’s increasing cooperation both with treaty partners, including Japan, South Korea and the Philippines, as well as with non-traditional allies such as Vietnam.

China’s uneasiness stems from the fact that the Pivot, as stated by US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta in June 2012, will see 60 per cent of the US Navy's fleet to be deployed to the Pacific by 2020. Singapore will be home to the US’ four new Littoral Combat Ships designed to fight close to shorelines, while Indonesia is looking to buy a broad range of US hardware and partake in joint manoeuvres. The Philippines is seeking to host more US troops on a rotating basis and Australia has agreed to allow up to 2,500 marines to be deployed to the northern city of Darwin.

Beijing’s Response
Washington’s build-up has invited Beijing’s criticism and strong reactions. The Ministry of National Defense, China, has cited the Pivot as an excuse for its own continued build-up, which has seen a 500 per cent rise since 2000. At $131 billion in 2013, China’s defence spending is second only to the US.

Secondly, China has also cited the US’ example for other actions, especially on its eastern front. Beijing’s moves include its assertion on the East China Sea against Japan and South Korea – both partners of the US – with the implementation of an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in order to “guard against potential air threats and early warning,” according to the Chinese Ministry of National Defense. The ADIZ encompasses the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands and the broader region. This has led to escalation of tensions. In response, the US, Japan and South Korea declared the area international waters and airspace.

The regional countries feel that a small and tactical dispute over the one set of islands has the potential to escalate into full-scale war between China and Japan.  The US is treaty bound to rescue Japan, in case of Chinese misadventure. Therefore, when the US Pacific Commander Samuel Locklear requested for additional amphibious lift capability from the Pentagon, security dilemma and arms race followed.

Third, China is laying greater emphasis on its ‘One China’ policy in international negotiations with respect to Taiwan. According to the March 2014 US Congressional report, ‘Taiwan: Major U.S. Arms Sales Since 1990’, the US’ arms transfers to Taiwan have been significant despite the absence of a defence treaty or a diplomatic relationship resulting in Taiwan ranking fifth (behind Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel, and Australia) in 2008-2011. On 27 March, the Chinese Ministry of National Defense urged the U.S. to stop arms sales to Taiwan immediately as it felt the US’ actions violated the spirit of 1972, 1979 and 1982 China-US joint communiqués.

Fourth, China has picked up squabbles with five neighbouring states over the South China Sea. Chinese President Xi Jinping, during his recent visit to Berlin, said, “we will not provoke trouble ourselves but we will not fear troubles provoked by others either. When it comes to our sovereignty and territorial integrity we will strongly safeguard these interests.”

Finally, on the diplomatic front, China considers the US’ involvement in maritime issues of Southeast Asia as direct provocation. As Washington pushes forward with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, China is enhancing its ties with the ASEAN, and is establishing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership to counter the US’ efforts.

Roots of Discord
The contest between China and the US, touted as rivalry of the 21st century, is a manifestation of ideological clashes of two entirely different world views: the ‘American dream’ and the ‘Chinese dream’. 

US President Barack Obama states that the American dream is essentially based on the ideals of liberty, respect for human rights and equality of opportunity to pursue happiness, in his autobiography, The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream. On the other hand, Chinese President Xi Jinping in his recent UNESCO address outlined the Chinese dream as the “great renewal of the Chinese nation. The Chinese dream is about prosperity of the country, rejuvenation of the nation, and the happiness of the people.”

The differing world views of ‘hope and freedom’ versus ‘great renewal’ are going to be the characteristic features of future contestations.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Monish Tourangbam,
"Rebalancing: Where Does India Figure?," 14 May 2014
Urbi Das,
"Rebalancing: An Instrument of Economic Diplomacy," 14 May 2014
Amrita Banerjee,
"Rebalancing: Nature of New Alliances," 14 May 2014

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.