Home Contact Us  

Peace & Conflict Database - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#5288, 23 May 2017
Local Elections in Nepal: Is the Second Phase Possible?
Pramod Jaiswal
Senior Fellow, IPCS
E-mail: pramod.jaiswal@ipcs.org

Nepal held the first phase of its local election in May 2017, after nearly 19 years. Following the expiry of the five-year term of the elected representatives in 2002, the local bodies have been without elected representatives for almost 14 years. The Nepalese Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ is all set to resign and hand over power to Nepali Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba. The second phase of the local election, scheduled for 14 June, will be conducted by the Deuba government. However, the Madhesi parties have warned that they would not participate in the local elections and would instead disrupt the process, unless amendments are endorsed in the constitution.
First Phase of Local Election
There was little hope among the people and the political parties that the first phase of local election would be held on the scheduled date of 14 May. However, the election was conducted in 34 districts of Nepal's three provinces (namely 3, 4 and 6) without major violence. The Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist Leninist) [CPN-UML] and the Nepali Congress won over 100 seats while the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) [CPN-MC] won less than half of them. However, the first phase of election was held on around 40 per cent of seats, mostly in hill districts. The second phase of election will be in favour of the Nepali Congress and Madhesis. Hence, in the final count, the Nepali Congress would emerge as the largest, followed by CPN-UML. 

The Prachanda-led government was under extreme pressure to hold the local election. As per the newly promulgated constitution, government has to conduct three tier elections – local, provincial and federal – before January 2018. There was excessive pressure from the main opposition, CPN-UML as well. However, the major obstacle was posed by the Madhesi parties who were against holding of the elections before the endorsement of the amendment in the constitution. After the assurance from the government of amending the constitution after the first phase of local election, Madhesi parties called off their protest programs and paved way for the first phase of election.

Is the Second Phase Possible?
The second phase of local election is scheduled for 14 June, which will be held in 41 districts of provinces 1, 2, 5 and 7. It consists of all the Madhes districts of Nepal and the Madhesi parties have warned the government of strong protests and disruption of election, if held without the endorsement of amendment in the constitution. Hence, holding the election without taking the Madhesi parties will be a herculean task. 

The amendment to the constitution requires support from two-third of the total seats. The ruling alliance and Madhesi parties are unable to garner enough support for amendment. The CPN-UML - the main opposition - is strongly against it. Similarly, the government does not want to push for voting unless there is enough support for amendment, while the CPN-UML would not allow the process to take places if there is a chance of the amendment getting endorsed because it is possible if some of the Madhesi leaders from his party support the amendment. Hence, the amendment of the constitution is stuck in the numbers game. 

The Madhesi parties have very few seats in the parliament. They could not garner a strong hold like in the first Constituent Assembly, as the parties got fragmented. India partly played a role in this process as it wanted to isolate Maoists. The Maoists and Madhesis share some similarities on issues of federalism. Hence, on several occasions, the Madhesis wanted to support the Maoists on the constitutional issues. However, since April 2017, the Madhesi parties are consolidating themselves. There were three major mergers of the Madhesi parties in April 2017.

On 5 April, the Bijay Kumar Gachhadar-led Madhesi People’s Rights Forum-Democratic; Yasoda Lama-led Dalit Janajati Party Nepal; and the Shiva Lal Thapa-led Janamukti Party announced the Nepal Democratic Forum. Similarly, on 20 April, the major Madhesi parties, namely Tarai Madhes Democratic Party led by senior Madhesi leader Mahanta Thakur; the Rajendra Mahato-led Sadbhawana Party; the Mahendra Ray Yadav-led Tarai Madhes Sadbhawana Party; the Sharat Singh Bhandari-led Rastriya Madhes Samajwadi Party; the Anil Kumar Jha-led Nepal Sadbhawana Party; and the Rajkishor Yadav-led Madheshi Janadhikar Forum-Republican formed the Rastriya Janata Party Nepal. Moreover, the Upendra Yadav- led Federal Socialist Forum-Nepal and the Baburam Bhattarailed newly formed Naya Shakti Party-Nepal announced a working alliance. The Naya Shakti Party and the Federal Socialist Forum-Nepal contested elections on one symbol and they are preparing for alliance with four to five small parties after the election.

Interestingly, after the merger, none of the Madhesi parties have ‘Madhes/ Terai’ in their name.  

The Way Forward
Sher Bahadur Deuba would take over as the prime minister after Prachanda's resignation. His tenure would be full of challenges; and the most immediate one would be to conduct the second phase of the local election within a few weeks, followed by two others – provincial and federal. His government should address the demands of the Madhesis and create a favourable environment for free and fair elections, which will pave way for peace and stability in Nepal.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Sushma Swaraj in Nepal: Reinvigorating Bilateral Relations?

Nepal Elections: Reading the Results

India-Nepal Relations: Mixed Fortunes

Seizing ‚ÄėThe Belt and Road‚Äô Opportunity: Challenges for Nepal

Forecast 2017: Nepal

Nepal: Local Body Elections Amid Uncertainty

FSI and Nepal

Contextualising KP Oliís India and China Visits

Significance of Prime Minister KP Oli's New Delhi Visit

Forecast 2016: Nepal

Nepalís Constitutional Questions and Madhesi Aspirations

Madhesi Demands in Nepal: Is there an End in Sight?

Nepalís New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?

Nepal: Political Rivalries Stymieing Constitution-making

IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015

Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

The Future of SAARC is Now

China in Nepal: Increasing Connectivity Via Railways

India-Nepal Hydroelectricity Deal: Making it Count

Federalism and Nepal: Internal Differences

Modi and Nepal-India Relations

Nepal: Challenges to Constitution-Making

Nepal's Restful Prime Minister

Chinese Inroads to Nepal

Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.