Home Contact Us  
   

Peace & Conflict Database - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#5294, 12 June 2017
 

Three Years of the Modi Government

India-Bangladesh: Engagement with More Stakeholders Required
Amit Ranjan
Visiting Research Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore
 

Unless there is a change in the form of government or there occurs a marked shift in global or regional political order, the foreign policy of any ‘normal’ country maintains continuity with its past. However, certain adjustments are made to accommodate visions of the new political leadership and to address day-to-day matters in foreign policy. As nothing of the nature has happened in last three years that can influence the existing global or regional order, India’s policy towards Bangladesh is in continuation with what it was under Dr Manmohan Singh led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government (2004-2014). 

Settlement of the India-Bangladesh Boundary Dispute
After Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office on 26 May 2014, his government’s first challenge on the foreign policy front was the ratification of the Land Boundary Agreement (LBA) with Bangladesh. The LBA protocol was signed by the UPA government in 2011. During his election speeches, particularly in constituencies bordering Bangladesh, Modi had stated that his government would not compromise with India's territorial sovereignty. However, soon after taking charge as the prime minister, he realised the differences between electoral rhetoric and policy related realities. His government supported the ratification of the LBA by the Indian parliament, despite opposition from some of his supporters in Assam. 

Later the prime minister himself went to Dhaka in June 2015 to exchange the ratified documents with his Bangladeshi counterpart, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. In a land swap exercise, India has received 2777.038 acres of adverse possession areas of land and transferred 2267.682 acres of same form of land to Bangladesh. India received 51 (7,110.2, 2, 8774 hectare acre) of the 71 Bangladeshi enclaves that are inside India proper; while Bangladesh received 95 of the 103 Indian enclaves that are inside Bangladesh proper (17,160.63 acres, 6,944.66 ha). In this land swap exercise, India gave around 40 km² (10,000 acres) to Bangladesh.

Before the exchange of the ratified documents of the LBA, in July 2014, India and Bangladesh also concluded their disputes over the Exclusive Economic Zone, which, unlike the LBA, was resolved through a verdict by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague. In its final verdict, the PCA awarded 19,467 square kilometres of the total 25,602 sq km sea area (76 percent) to Bangladesh, leaving 6,135 sq km (24 percent) to India. The judgement also allowed Bangladesh a 200 mile Exclusive Economic Zone. The government of India chose to accept the verdict.

Economic Engagements
Growing engagements between Bangladesh and China do influence India’s policy towards Bangladesh. In a bid to keep Bangladesh out of Chinese sphere of influence, India has increased its economic engagements with Bangladesh. During Prime Minister Modi's 2015 visit to Bangladesh, the two countries signed 22 agreements and Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs). Earlier, in 2011, India provided $ 1 billion Line of Credit (LOC) to Bangladesh, which was increased to $2 billion in 2015.

Furthermore, in 2017, during Hasina’s New Delhi visit, the two countries signed 35 agreements and MoUs. India announced the third (a new) concessional LOC of $ 4.5 billion to Bangladesh. This is mainly in priority sectors to bring India’s resource allocation to Bangladesh to over $8 billion by 2023.

Between the two bilateral visits, on 14 October 2016, Chinese President Xi Jinping landed in Dhaka.  During his visit, Bangladesh and China signed 27 agreements and MoUs between the two governments; while the Chinese state-owned and private entities signed 13 agreements mostly with Bangladeshi private enterprises. In total, the two countries signed 40 agreements and MoUs worth over $25 billion.

Security and Defence
More than the increasing numbers of Chinese industries in Bangladesh, it is presence of the Peoples Liberation Army Naval (PLAN) ships in the Bay of Bengal that worries India. The presence of PLAN ships has been possible due to growing defence engagements between Bangladesh and China since 2000. To secure its strategic interests in the Bay of Bengal, India is also engaging with Bangladesh on defence and security related issues. 

In recent times, after the two Chinese submarines joined the Bangladesh navy in November 2016, the then Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar visited Bangladesh from 30 November to 1 December 2016. His delegation included Vice Chiefs of Army, Air Force, and Navy along with the Director General of the Coast Guard. 

During Hasina’s 2017 visit to New Delhi, India and Bangladesh signed two agreements and seven MoUs. India announced a LOC worth $500 million to Bangladesh for procurement of defence goods. This has been criticised by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and others. Interestingly, an almost similar defence deal was signed between Bangladesh and China in 2002. 

India has repeatedly expressed its support to Bangladesh in its fight against militancy. In May 2016, the Indian foreign secretary went to Bangladesh when the thenUS Department of State’s Assistant Secretary Nisha Desai Biswal was in Dhaka. At that time, although denied by the government officials of the two respective countries, the media was rife with a rumor of India-US cooperation in tackling militancy in Bangladesh.

Teesta River Issue
In September 2011, India and Bangladesh agreed on a new percentage of water sharing from the trans-boundary river, Teesta. The deal was not agreed upon because the Chief Minister of West Bengal, Mamata Banerjee, declined to accept it citing that she believed that Bangladesh would get 33,000 cubic feet per second (cusec) of water annually, instead of the 25,000 cusecs originally agreed upon.

Since then, Bangladesh is trying through all diplomatic means to persuade Mamata Banerjee but the chief minister has not yet changed her position. During her visit to India in 2017, Hasina began with Teesta and finished with it albeit she could not clinch the deal. In Bangladesh, the non-conclusion of the Teesta issue is being considered as a sign of not taking care about Bangladesh’s national interests by India. 

Looking Ahead
In the last three years, like in past, India’s policy towards Bangladesh continues with India’s ‘over’ dependence on the Awami League leadership instead of engaging with others also. A tactical shift is needed to adjust with the emerging socio-political reality in Bangladesh.
 
Views expressed are personal and do not reflect those of the organisations to which the author is affiliated.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
India-Bangladesh: What to Expect During Prime Minister Hasina's Visit?

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.