Home Contact Us  
   

Peace & Conflict Database - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4518, 16 June 2014
 

South China Sea

China's 'Salami Slicing': What's Next?
Teshu Singh
Senior Research Officer
E-mail: teshu@ipcs.org
 

It has been over a month since China installed an oil rig in the disputed South China Sea (SCS). Ever since, China has shifted the location of the rig thrice. The installation of the rig appears to be a well calibrated move. Evidently, China has adopted a ‘salami slicing’ (step-by-step approach) in the SCS. It took over Mischief Reef from the Philippines in 1995; established Sansha city on the Yongxing Island/Woody Island a few kilometres from its Hainan Province; cut the cables of the Vietnamese vessels; occupied Scarborough Shoal; and is now constructing a runway on Johnson South Reef. The rig appears to be their next move in the region.

Subsequent to the installation, China issued an official document titled ‘The operation of HYSY 981 grilling rig: Vietnam’s Provocation and China’s Position’ on the 8 June, reaffirming its position. It has also taken the issue to the UN. Chinese Deputy Ambassador Wang Min sent a ‘position paper’ on the rig to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and asked the UN chief to circulate it to the 193 members of the General Assembly. This is in sharp contrast to China’s previous gestures. During the Shangri La Dialogue, Lt. General Wang Ghuanzhong of the People’s Liberation Army reiterated China’s position that territorial disputes should be settled bilaterally between the claimants with clear indication that the US should keep away from the disputes. Until now China stood for bilateral solution of disputes and was against any arbitration. By issuing the statement and sending a ‘position paper’, China is itself internationalising the issue.

These developments have further increased the tension in the SCS dispute making it further complicated. It is hence perplexing to understand as to why China issued a ‘position paper’ on the rig in the disputed area. What is China’s end game in the region?

Rig HYSY 981 in the Disputed Area
The rig is placed between the Paracel Islands occupied by China and the Vietnam. Since 1974, China occupied the Paracels (Xisha/Hoangsa Island).The problem arises with the different interpretation of the position of the rig. According to Vietnam, the rig is operating within 200 nautical miles of its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and on its continental shelf but China says that it is operating in its own territory. China and Vietnam have already signed the agreement on the delimitation of the territorial seas; EEZs and the continental shelf in the Beibu Gulf (Gulf of Tonkin); and the agreement on the fishery cooperation in the region in 2000. Till date, this is the only maritime boundary agreement that China has had with any other country.

There are two reasons for China establishing the rig; energy security and the strategic concerns in the region. Since 1993, China has been a net importer of oil and is heavily dependent on supply from abroad. Thus, to reduce the dependence on foreign oil, China is in the process of exploring different plausible locations; and the SCS has approximately 11 billion barrels of oil reserves and 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. On the strategic front, there is an increasing role of external powers in the region. China Daily reported that “the United States was the real threat…pointing to U.S. cyber-warfare and missile defence capabilities and the fact that U.S. defence spending far exceeded China‘s.” Nevertheless, the most likely rationale for the installation of the rig is that it is China’s response to the changing strategic environment of the SCS.

China's Endgame in the Region
China has realised that the SCS is vital for both solidifying its influence in the Southeast Asia, as well as for its regional aspirations. China aspires to play an important role in the region with minimum US influence and has thus turned towards multilateral solution to the dispute. Perhaps it has realised that if it continues defying international laws and UN mandates, it will give more space for the US to interfere in the region as is evident in the case of the enhancing US-Philippines alliance. 

Yet, another reason for putting forward the ‘position paper’ is to stop the discussion for a ‘Code of Conduct’ in the region which is already due after the ‘2002 code of Conduct’. By putting forward the ‘position paper’, China is trying to make its own stand clear and thereby putting the blame on the Vietnam.

At this juncture, China’s strategy in the region appears to be a combination of tactical timing and ambiguity. Thus the installation of the rig has taken the dispute to a multilateral forum. However, its solution remains uncertain.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Roomana Hukil,
"China-Vietnam: The Oil Rig Non-diplomacy," 28 May 2014

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
The Geopolitics of Chinese Investments in Sri Lanka

China’s Endgame in Afghanistan

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.