Home Contact Us  

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4323, 5 March 2014

Taliban Tracker

Unraveling of FATA
D Suba Chandran
Director, IPCS

Where does the Federally Administered Tribal Agencies (FATA) of Pakistan stand today in the ongoing talks and violence led by the Taliban and the State? What does the FATA want, in terms of the ongoing war against terrorism across the Durand Line? Do they support the Taliban, al Qaeda and the Teherik-e-Taliban Pakistan? Are the voices of common men in the tribal agencies being heard and discussed? Or the ongoing violence led by the Taliban and its franchisees have super-imposed a different debate over what the people in FATA want?

While the State and TTP are represented by the two Committees in the negotiations between the two sides, the wishes of common tribes in FATA seem to be ignored. With TTP and its sympathizers projecting themselves as the voice of local people in the region, it appears evident that the TTP has monopolized the debate in the FATA. And in this process, tribal institutions are either being undermined or completely broken by new actors.

Traditionally and historically, the Pashtun society of FATA has always been led by its elders and jirgas to settle issues – from personal to collective. From Alexander the Great to the British Empire, successive governments and rulers dealt with the Pashtun societies through the jirgas and elders. Decisions to fight, cease fire, provide protection to individuals and groups, and revoke them – until now have been collectively taken by the tribal multiple societies within the FATA. While personal issues within were debated by the concerned tribe, inter-tribal issues and conflicts were settled through the elders from both sides discussing through the jirgas. The same was applied to the discussions between the tribes and the State. Elders and Jirgas have remained the bedrock of conflict management and resolution within and between the tribes in FATA and between them and the State. Until now.

The tribal society how much ever violent and fiercely independent they remained throughout the history, decisions were collectively made through jirgas, with so much respect for the elders. Battles and truces – individual and collective, were primarily made by the Pashtun society, again through the above two institutions. In fact, this has been very much a part of their pashtunwali, which the entire society takes pride in.
Unfortunately, these two institutions seem to be fast losing their relevance today, in the ongoing conflict and violence between the Taliban and the State. Besides the destruction of these two institutions, the aspirations of majority in the FATA is being sidelined and usurped by a small minority, using guns and violence.

True, the tribal Pashtun society in FATA and across the Durand Line has their own version of customs and practices, which may not be justifiable in contemporary world. Certain practices pursued even today may look beyond reasoning. The truth also is a section amongst the rest, starting from British military historians, have projected the society as primitive and savage, as if they are only buoyed by violence and jihad. This is an incomplete picture of any anthropological and historical study of the Pashtun society.

Today, a substantial section within the FATA has been fighting for reforms – from education to administration, bringing the tribal society on part with the rest. From the demand to repeal the archaic Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR) and the Malik System established by the British and continued by the federal government in Islamabad, to the conversion of FATA into a province, the local civil society has been pleading for political reforms.

Subsequent governments in Islamabad and Peshawar failed to address this increasing demand, and allowed the existing institutions to rot and abuse. Much before the Taliban and the Mujahideen questioning the writ, the State itself was only happy to abdicate the same. Perhaps, it was too convenient for the State to do so, than to establish its own writ, thereby an effective administration in the FATA. The former needs a proactive strategy to bring the tribal society at par with the rest; while the latter needs nothing. The State can sit back, relax and do nothing; and all in the name of protecting age old traditions! Perhaps, it was also easier for the military and its ISI to let this space be ungoverned, so that it could be abused to achieve Islamabad and Rawalpindi’s objectives in Kabul.

Taliban, al Qaeda and the numerous foreign fighters then, and the TTP today is only making use of this failure of State to enforce its own writ. The TTP has made itself the sole spokesman of the FATA and the usurped of all the local debates through brute force. In fact, more than the American drones and Pakistani military operations, numerous innocent lives have been lost to the violence led by TTP. The suicide bombings that the Taliban carried out on funerals and tribal jirgas have not only killed numerous civilians, but also brutalized the tribal society.

More than the demand from the TTP, what is likely to prove crucial will be the State’s response. How far will the State go in yielding to TTP’s demands, especially relating to military operations, removal of security check posts and the imposition of Shariah?
The State has already yielded too much space to the TTP in the FATA. First and foremost, the State’s efforts to reach multiple deals with the Taliban during the last decade have made the militants a stakeholder in the tribal society. Until then, the State – from the British days, used to deal collectively with the tribal society led by the elders and jirgas, and impose order or demand punishment. Second, the State repeatedly failed to apply adequate military pressure on the militants, that too more because of the American intransigence. Otherwise, the military operations were selective and only for a short period. Operations in Swat were the only exception to the above trend. Worse, the State has turned a blind eye to the multiple killings and suicide bombings of innocent civilians by the Taliban in FATA.

If the ongoing talks today would end up in releasing the prisoners, and closure of military operations, that would be a huge victory for the Taliban in FATA and adjoining areas in KP. Worse, as a bargain and compromise, if the State agrees to the Taliban to a limited imposition of Shariah in the FATA, as the previous government did in Swat, it would be the most inhumane damage that the government could inflict on the tribal Agencies and its people. As if the people in FATA only deserve the Taliban and its dictates.

The State’s weakness, rather than TTP’s strength would start the unraveling of FATA. Perhaps, the process has already begun.

By arrangement with Rising Kashmir

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
D Suba Chandran,
"Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?," 3 March 2014
Salma Malik,
"Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?," 17 February 2014

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Will the Genie Want to Go Back?

The Fall of Rajapaksa: Why Democracies Fail Strongmen

Pakistan: The Military Courts

From Kashmir to Kabul

A Fractured Mandate: The Big Picture

And Now, They Are Coming For Our Children

Pak-Afghan Reset: Will the Taliban and al Qaeda follow?

Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues

Rise India, avoid regional pitfalls

Foreign Fighters of Pakistan: Why Pashtuns and Punjabis?

Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?

The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani

Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping: Strong Leaders, Hard Issues

Pakistan: The Coup that didn’t take

Pakistan: Crouching Democrats, Hidden Khakis

Processes at the cost of peace?

Cost of Peace

Rise of Democratic Anarchists

Don’t steal the election now

Mullah Fazlullah: Challenges to the “Eliminate or Extradite” Approach

The Tahirul Qadri Affair

Dhaka as the Gateway to India’s Look East Policy

Modi, Sharif and the Cross-LoC Interactions

Region by Sub-regions

Civil-Military Equations in Pakistan: Que Sera Sera

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.