Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#3168, 24 June 2010

Sino-Pak N-deal: a Setback to India-China Ties?

M Shamsur Rabb Khan
Freelancer
email: samsur.khan@gmail.com

The report on the formalization of the China-Pakistan nuclear deal between China Nuclear Power Corporation and the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, similar to the landmark nuclear agreement with Indo-US civil nuclear deal signed in 2008, has come as a setback to New Delhi in normalizing bilateral relations with China. As per the deal, China plans to build two nuclear reactors at the Chashma site in Pakistan. The first negative fall-out of such a deal would be the crack in deepening or improving the Sino-India relationship that saw some positive sings in recent times, more precisely since the climate change summit at Copenhagen in December 2009, where Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Premier Wen Jiabao surprised the world with their coordination. The last month visit of the President Pratibha Patil to China, which India declared as successful and forward-looking, was a step in that direction. But in the face of a nuclear deal with Pakistan, New Delhi has conveyed its strong reservations to Beijing.

Given the long hostility against India, if Beijing formalizes the deal with Pakistan, New Delhi is left with no doubt about China’s intention to prefer nuclear engagement with Pakistan at the costs of its relations with India. More than that, India will not take it as a friendly gesture from China, if it goes ahead with creating a nuclear parity between India and Pakistan. It will stamp a belief in the country that all efforts by India to have closer ties with China will not alter Beijing’s ‘all-weather partnership with Pakistan’. Albeit China asserts that the nuclear deal between China and Pakistan is in line with each side’s international obligations and it is for peaceful purposes, it is in violation of the guidelines of the 46-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) that China joined in 2004. Even if the tangles of legality pave the way for such a deal, New Delhi’s concern is genuine due to the past record of clandestine military nuclear cooperation between China and Pakistan. At least, India would want an assurance that China is not expanding its clandestine collaboration with Pakistan under the guise of civilian cooperation.

It seems to be clear that China is taking a leaf out of Indo-US civil nuclear agreement in pushing forward a policy New Delhi would resent. China must understand there is no comparison between Indo-US civil nuclear agreement and Sino-Pakistan cooperation because of the fact that the former has to go through a long process of revising the NSG rules and the US domestic law. But China is trying to extend a similar benefit to Pakistan without any due legal process or international debate on the pros and cons on the issue. The two deals can also not be equated due to the huge difference in proliferation records of India and Pakistan. Given the widespread proliferation that resulted from the Pakistan-based AQ Khan network that handed out nuclear secrets to Iran, Libya and North Korea, as well as continued concerns about the existence of terrorist networks in Pakistan that seek access to nuclear weapons technology; the Chinese decision to have a nuclear cooperation with Pakistan is shortsighted.

If China continues to play its strategic card by exposing India to two fronts of hostility, then India has every reason to counter such a deal. By all accounts, China’s move to seal a nuclear deal with Pakistan may take back Sino-India relations to square one, and all efforts, for example, frequent high-level interactions in 2009 and President Hu Jintao’s talks with the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) or at Yekaterinburg, Russia, during Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) meet, or Wen Jiabao’s meeting with Manmohan Singh at the East Asia Summit in Thailand – all seem fruitless. Sino-Pak ties, on the other hand, are deepening through bilateral defence trade with China supplying its most advanced home-made combat aircraft, the third-generation J-10 fighter jets to Pakistan, besides decades of joint ventures including the JF-17 Thunder fighter aircraft, the K-8 Karakorum advance training aircraft, and the Babur cruise missile.

After a long silence, the US has come out with a statement that it will raise objections to the proposed nuclear deal between China and Pakistan. According to the Obama administration, Beijing is going to violate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that forbids export of nuclear reactors to countries that have not signed the pact if it goes ahead with the deal. The State Department has asked Beijing to cooperate with Pakistan in ways consistent with Chinese non-proliferation obligations. In the ongoing meeting of the NSG (21-25 June, 2010), China will reportedly make a statement on its decision to supply two more nuclear reactors to Pakistan. India is set to offer concerns, by exposing the underlying flaws in China's argument in support of such a deal. But will the NSG agree to the Chinese arguments in maintaining a nuclear parity between India and Pakistan?

Rate this Article

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
 
Related Article
Sino-Pak Nuclear Deal: American Perfidy?
Sino-Pak Nuclear Engagement-IV: What Can India Do?
Sino-Pak Nuclear Engagement -I: The Big ‘Deal’
Sino-Pak Nuclear Engagement-II: Where Does the US Stand?
Sino-Pak Nuclear Engagement-III: Strategic Implications

 
Article by same Author
The Killing of Shahzad: Links between the al Qaeda and the Pakistan Navy in the Open?
India's Contentious 50 Most Wanted Terrorists List
WikiWrecks: 26/11 and US Intent
Two Summits; Conflicting Messages
David Headley’s Plea Bargain and India-US Relations
Tackling Maoist Terror
The Strategic Significance of Arihant
Enhancing the Credibility of CRPF
Role of Private Sector in Preventing Terror Attacks
Change Has Come to J&K
Aerial Security Against Terror Attacks
Hindu Terror: A More Serious Threat
Tackling Terror: Reforms, Not Stringent Laws, Necessary
NSG Waiver: What does it mean for India?
Will the Nuclear Deal Hurt India's Foreign Policy?
Elections in the Himalayan Kingdom: New Dawn of India-Bhutan Relations
Sagarika: A Feather in India's Defense Hat
Securing India's Coastline
Time to Revive India-Iran Relations
Indo-Israel Defence Cooperation: A Step in the Right Direction
Poor Policing and Weak Intelligence Gathering

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.