Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#740, 26 April 2002
 
Referendum in Pakistan-II The Decisive Factors and Actors
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

The following factors and actors will determine the outcome of the referendum, by which General Musharraf has sought the support of his people to remain as President for five more years.

 

 

The Security Machinery

 

 

The security forces, including the military and the police, will obviously be the most important for making the referendum a success. They would be involved in keeping the political parties and their activities under control. Anti-referendum parties and groups will not be allowed to hold rallies and reach the public. The ISI and other intelligence agencies would, in fact, be contacting the leaders of the various groups and parties to gain their support.

 

 

The Politico-Religious Parties and Groups 

 

 

These could be divided into two categories – those who support and those who oppose the referendum. There are a number of minor parties, groups and individuals who support the referendum, but whose popularity among the public is limited. However, a section of the Ulema are supporting the referendum; on a day-to-day basis, the Ulema are closer to the people, especially in rural Pakistan .

 

 

The major political and religious parties like the Pakistan Muslim League (PML), the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), Jamaat-e-Islami and groups like the Alliance for Restoration of Democracy (ARD) and Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA) are against the referendum and have an organized structure to mobilize people against the referendum. The military regime will, however, give more freedom to the activities of the pro-referendum parties and curb the anti-referendum parties and groups. Further, major leaders like Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif are either out of the country or under arrest. As a result, the anti-referendum parties will be ineffective in mobilizing people against the referendum. 

 

 

The Nazims 

 

 

Nazims were elected by the people in the local elections conducted by the military regime. The military regime is confident that they would reach the people, canvass support among them and bring them on the referendum day to vote in its favour. In short, the Nazims will act as the government’s political cadres and polling agents. Given the close and personal connections between the people and their Nazims, this factor will determine the outcome of the referendum in favour of Musharraf. This is why Musharraf has been meeting the Nazims and holding consultations with them. They would be only too happy to assist Musharraf, as their survival depends on the continuity of the local government system introduced by him.

 

 

The People

 

 

The majority seems to approve whatever the military regime has carried out. Although they may not be completely satisfied with the regime’s performance, the general feeling is that the military regime is functioning better than the previous civilian regimes, especially in maintaining law and order, reducing corruption and reviving the economy. Hence, it can be expected that the people will vote in favor of Musharraf in the referendum. Secondly, the younger generation seems in his favour, which is why he reduced the age of voting from 21 to 18.

 

 

The Media

 

 

The media, surprisingly, is adopting a low profile on this issue. None of the editorials in the leading English dailies have condemned the initiative, and only seem more worried about its modalities. Hence, the media is not mobilizing any opinion against the referendum, apart from publishing opinion articles by leading analysts.

 

 

International Opinion

 

 

It is more than a coincidence that Ayub Khan, Zia-ul-Haq and Musharraf were able to get the support of international opinion (read as American opinion) in their favour. Ayub Khan got their support for his role in consolidating the Cold War; Zia for his “jihad” against the Soviet Union ; and Musharraf for his contribution to the US-led “War against Terrorism.” It is unlikely that there would be any opposition from the Western countries, the so-called defenders of democratic principles and human rights. As long as their strategic and security interests are ensured by the military regime, referendum, elections and other related issues would remain the “internal” affairs of Pakistan . International pressure, or rather the lack of it, will help Musharraf go ahead with his policies. The US , in particular, will not speak against the referendum, especially when American security forces are carrying out raids, alongwith Pakistani security forces, against the Al-Qaida leaders and cadres inside Pakistan .

 

 

Given all these factors, it should be a cakewalk for General Musharraf to organize and win the proposed referendum. 

 

 

 

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet