Home Contact Us
Search :

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3312, 7 January 2011
Reading Pakistan-I: Who Killed Salman Taseer?
D Suba Chandran
Director, IPCS
email: subachandran@gmail.com

Yes, of course the security guard pumped bullets into Salman Taseer, the Governor of Punjab, who stood against the Blasphemy laws in Pakistan. But, did he really kill Taseer? Or is he only an expression and an instrument of a larger narrow religious chauvinism?

Salman Taseer was not assassinated for political reasons. His assassination was a culmination of his opposition to the blasphemy law in general, and more specifically, his efforts to commute the death sentence of Aasiya Bibi, awarded by the lower court on charges of blasphemy.

The primary responsibility of Taseer’s assassination rests with the PPP, especially Asif Ali Zardari, the President and Yusuf Gilani, the Prime Minister. Both are nothing but opportunistic cowards, who let their own men and women within the PPP down by not backing them. Salman Taseer and Sherry Rehman (another PPP MNA and a liberal stalwart) are perhaps the few voices of sanity and courage within the PPP, who decided to stand up and speak for what Jinnah believed. If Taseer decided to pursue the case of Aasiya Bibi, Sherry Rehman courageously submitted a bill to amend the blasphemy laws.

Alas, what did the Prime Minister and the President do? Instead of lending their support, both decided to distance themselves from these two initiatives to ensure the survival of their government. Neither the President nor the Prime Minister has the courage to amend the blasphemy laws; they fear this will give more power to the religious political parties which will only further destabilize the government. No one is asking for its complete repeal, which will be ideal. The demand from the liberal section today is only to amend the blasphemy law, so that it is not misused.

What has been the role of other political parties, outside the PPP, in amending these blasphemy laws? The PML-N has always been playing dirty on this issue and never come on board. Its political interests have always been dominant, even at the costs of national interest. Whether it is the case of blasphemy laws or the presence of the Taliban (and its supporters) in Punjab, referred as the Punjabi Taliban, the PML-N has never countered the growing extremism inside Pakistan. In fact, in terms of ideological orientation on this issue, PML-N and PML-Q are much closer to the religious parties. Neither of these two parties has made any official announcement on their stand on the blasphemy law. While the PPP may have wanted to take on the religious parties on this issue, it is the lack of support from the PML and its variants in Punjab that has led to Zardari’s deficiency in not taking a decisive step.

The religious political parties need to be appreciated on this issue, for there is no hypocrisy involved. They are openly against the repeal or even amendment of the blasphemy law and have been publicly vocal about their sentiments. They favour moderate radicalization as long as it serves to politicize the issue and remain relevant, and most importantly, to gather votes. Along with religious organizations, the religious political parties have made their stand public and stand by it.

The public stand of religious parties rallies a section of civil society that believes in such extremist ideas - from conservative NGOs to lawyers, as was made explicit in the public showering of flowers on the killer of Salman Taseer, when he was produced in Court. The support for the assassin was so shrill and widespread, that the Dawn reported: “ Because of fears for their safety, no public prosecutor turned up at the court and the police officers concerned had to argue the case themselves.” The group that has so vociferously lent its support to the assassin is in all likelihood no more than a small bunch of fringe radical elements.

Unfortunately for Pakistan, this section of civil society has found a strong platform in the media. A large part of the print and electronic media provides the much needed space to both civil society and radical groups to publicize their cause.

Finally, the intelligence organizations have well established links with all the above sections to espouse a particular cause - radical groups, religious political parties and the media. They believe their actions are in the interest of the nation and are essential to pursue a strategic course vis-à-vis India and Afghanistan. In fact most of the radical backlash that Pakistan is witnessing today, that has taken the lives of Benazir Bhutto, Salman Taseer and numerous other unknown names, is the result of flawed polices that the intelligence agencies and security forces pursued vis-à-vis their eastern and western neighbours. 

It was thus not Mumtaz Qadri, the assassin who actually sprayed the bullets that killed Taseer. He is only an expression and an instrument of a larger problem that Pakistan is grappling with. Any answer that deals with the question of who killed Taseer should also explore the larger issue rather than just allegations of Qadri’s links with a radical group or the matter of it being a political conspiracy, as the PPP may want to shift the blame.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
D Suba Chandran,
"Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura," 5 January 2012
D Suba Chandran,
"Reading Pakistan-II: Four Implications of Salman Taseer’s Assassination," 10 January 2011
Sanjay Pulipaka,
"Notions of Grievance and Jihadi Terrorism," 14 July 2009

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Rise of Democratic Anarchists

Don’t steal the election now

Mullah Fazlullah: Challenges to the “Eliminate or Extradite” Approach

The Tahirul Qadri Affair

Dhaka as the Gateway to India’s Look East Policy

Modi, Sharif and the Cross-LoC Interactions

Region by Sub-regions

Civil-Military Equations in Pakistan: Que Sera Sera

End of the Road for Taliban?

Presidential Election: Thus spoke the Afghans

Importance of Jamat-e-Islami

Talks with the Taliban: Endgame for the TTP

And Now, They are Coming for Us

Honouring the Dead

The Demographic Dividend

Pivot, Rebalance and What Next?

Unraveling of FATA

Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?

TTP under Mullah Fazlullah: What Next for the Pakistani Taliban?

Connecting Asia: South Asia as a Strategic Bridge

Talks with the TTP: How Far will the State Go?

Cross-LoC Trade and Our Collective Failure

Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse

Expanse of Federalism: South Asia Sui Generis?

Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com