Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#822, 11 August 2002
 
Pakistan Constitutional Proposals – I: A Puppet Prime Minister and a Powerless Parliament
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

     Of the proposed amendments to the Pakistani Constitution, the most important is the one empowering the President to appoint and remove the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. This proposal seeks to provide the President with ‘discretionary’ powers to remove these functionaries for serious abuse of authority, failure to check corruption, compromising national security, and violating the Constitution. A Prime Minister removed by the President is not eligible for re-appointment for the remaining term of the National Assembly and the President will have the power to appoint any other member.

     With these extensive powers the President will gain enormous control over the functioning of Parliament. During 1988-1996, the President used this power four times to dismiss the Prime Minister, and no National Assembly was allowed to complete its term. Dismissal of the Prime Minister and the National Assembly had its repercussions on the Provincial Assemblies and the Chief Ministers. During this period the Provincial Assemblies were dissolved, in total, for sixteen times with the Chief Ministers being dismissed.

     Given the political history of party politics in Pakistan and intra-factional feuds within its major and minor parties, it would be very easy for the President to find a new person for the Prime Minister’s job; hence, the serving Prime Minister would always need to be circumspect in his relations with the President. Even if the Prime Minster had an absolute hold over his party, and the party has a majority in the National Assembly, the President could have his way in dismissing the National Assembly. Given the steps taken by General Musharraf to keep Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto out of their party and the country, it is highly unlikely that any charismatic leadership would emerge commanding the total loyalty of his or her party. Besides, without their star campaigners both the PML and PPP are not likely to get a majority in the National Assembly; thus it is unlikely that any single party would gain a majority in the forthcoming Assembly.

     Thus Musharraf has made sure through legal, constitutional and other means that the two important leaders of the PML (N) and PPP are kept out of the forthcoming elections, ensuring a fractured National Assembly. A divided National Assembly would be kept divided by political manipulation, making sure that no group or faction in future Assemblies would be powerful enough to challenge the President, either politically or constitutionally. Thus, the President would remain supreme forever.

     Besides, the fractured nature of Parliament would provide opportunities for dirty political maneuverings within and outside Parliament, which would affect governance. Bad governance and murky politics would further erode the legitimacy of the political parties and their leaders among the public. This is precisely what the military wants – to thoroughly discredit the political parties and the political process inside Pakistan, ultimately creating the perception that the military is the only institution that could protect the interests of Pakistan.

     In these circumstances, a Prime Minister could always be picked up and sacked, and the National Assembly that could always be dissolved by the President at his discretion – this would effectively undermine the slow and dented growth of the democratic process in Pakistan, both at the national and provincial levels.

     The constitutional proposals that have been submitted by the NRB should be read alongwith the Political Parties Order (PPO) 2002, which is mainly aimed at three major political parties – PPP, PML (N) and MQM, and their leadership. The PPO 2002 disqualifies a person from holding any office in a political party if he is disqualified under Article 63; this Article seeks to disqualify a person who has been convicted on a ‘charge of corrupt practice, moral turpitude or misuse of power.’ And if political parties do not remove such people from their leadership, the party would also be disqualified from contesting the forth-coming elections. Both the PPO and the constitutional proposals are clearly aimed at Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif and their parties. Without the participation of these two leaders and their parties, elections in Pakistan could never be called free and fair. 

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet