Home Contact Us
Search :
   

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#1914, 28 December 2005
 
Kalabagh: Forcing Consensus
Alok Bansal
Security Analyst, New Delhi
 

General Pervez Musharraf has restarted his efforts to force a consensus in favour of the Kalabagh Dam. He has reiterated that construction of big water reservoirs is the need of the hour, highlighting the need to augment water storage and power generation to meet the requirements of a rising population. He has asserted that in national interest, the decision had to be taken at all costs, while urging the ruling party to mobilize public opinion in favour of the dam. According to Pakistani government sources there are four dams - Kalabagh, Bhasha, Akhori and Katzara - which are under active consideration, that could generate 44,000 MW of hydel power. Kalabagh Dam will generate 3,600 MW of electricity and provide water storage capacity of 6.1 million acre feet, Bhasha Dam has the potential to generate 4,500 MW of electricity and store 7.2 MAF. Akhori Dam has a storage capacity of 6 MAF water and could generate 600 MW of electricity. The figures differ from those released earlier and indicate an attempt by the government to generate consensus in favour of Kalabagh and Bhasha dams. Musharraf has publicly advocated the construction of Kalabagh Dam, which, at $6 billion, is the most economical among the proposed dams.

Pakistan has not built any major dams since Tarbela, which was completed in 1977. Since then Pakistan has relied on thermal power plants to meet its requirements. Silting has reduced the capacities of the Tarbela and Mangla dams by 30 per cent and affected the energy production as well as the volume of irrigation water that is released. There is, therefore, an inevitability about constructing a mega dam; a national consensus eludes Pakistan on this issue, with the smaller provinces opposing construction of the Kalabagh Dam. The farmers in Sindh feel that construction of this mega dam will deprive them of their share of water and lead to widespread salinity. Though the government insists that 8.6 million-acre feet of water will be released below Kotri to check sea intrusion and environmental damage, it has failed to convince the Sindhis. Chief Minister Arbab Ghulam Rahim has publicly declared his willingness to sacrifice his post to defend the interests of Sindh. Even his alliance partner Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) has threatened to withdraw from the ruling coalition if it is not taken into confidence regarding plans to construct the Kalabagh Dam. MQM chief Altaf Hussain has come out strongly against the dam and, if MQM's past track record is any indicator, it is willing to adopt an anti-government stance if that enhances its anti-Punjab image. MQM is on an upswing, having sent Muttahida Majlis e Amal (MMA) packing from Karachi in the local bodies' poll. Its relief operations in the Northern Areas and NWFP after the earthquake have also won it widespread acclaim. A major stakeholder in the Sindh government and an ally at the Centre, MQM's support in the National Assembly is the key to the survival of the government. Musharraf had probably not bargained for this sort of open defiance by members of ruling coalition.

Similarly, there is widespread opposition to the dam in NWFP, which feels that the Kalabagh Dam will inundate large tracts of fertile and populated lands. The affected population in this volatile and heavily armed province will not accept the Kalabagh Dam, especially when people displaced by Tarbela have not yet been rehabilitated. The MMA government in NWFP and the Awami National Party (ANP) are vehemently opposed to Kalabagh. Till recently, the ruling elite were veering around to the prospects of building the dams at Bhasha and Skardu, as it would avoid inundation of land in NWFP. However, the recent quake has placed a question mark over the desirability of constructing large dams in Northern Areas, a highly seismic and geologically unstable region.

The important point is that a national consensus does not exist in Pakistan at present, even though the party in power in the federal government is also ruling in three of the provinces. The situation may become worse after the general election in 2007. There is no doubt that a big dam should have been constructed in Pakistan long ago. However, due to its political mess, a national consensus has not been possible. Going ahead with the Kalabagh or Bhasha dams without the agreement of all the constituent units will be a disaster and will ensure that foreign donors do not commit aid to this politically controversial project.

 
Article by same Author
India's Offer of Electricity to Pakistan: An Analysis

Balochistan: Conflict Continues

Pakistan: A Vote Against Musharraf and the Mullahs

FATA: Pakistan in the throes of another Dilemma

Balochistan Liberation Army: Playing to its Strength

Gwadar Port : Economic Panacea or A Red Herring

Northern Areas in Pakistan: Simmering Discontent

Pakistan: New Strands of Sectarianism

Kalabagh: The General Retreat

Democracy in Maldives: Troubles of Transition

Balochistan Still Simmering

Karakoram in Turmoil

Gwadar - Port of Hope or Despair?

Baglihar and Kishanganga: Problems of Trust

Kalabagh, Bhasha or Skardu - Pakistan's Quest for Mega Dams

Maldives: Inching Towards Multiparty Democracy

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2013, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com