Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#845, 31 August 2002
 
Inside Pakistan IV: Return of the Daughter
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

     A major question during the last week (19-25 August 2002) was whether Benazir Bhutto would return to Pakistan and lead her party in the forthcoming elections. The military regime has categorically stated that Benazir would be arrested as soon as she lands in Pakistan.

     The military regime has enacted a series of legal measures, mainly to prevent Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif from leading their respective parties. Under them, any individual who has been convicted by a court of law to a jail term for two years, is not eligible to hold any party office (Political Parties Amendment Ordinance). It was followed up by another amendment, which bars individuals, who have been Prime Ministers or Chief Ministers for two terms from holding the same office again. Recently, the Conduct of General Election Order was amended to prevent individuals who have been absconding from contesting the elections. All these measures are clearly Benazir specific to prevent her from becoming the Prime Minister, and even contesting the elections.

     The military regime is shaken over reports that the PPP would win the forthcoming elections and form the government both at the provincial and national levels. With the success of any pro-military alliance doubtful, due to various reasons, the regime wants to arrest Benazir the moment she lands in Pakistan.

     The significant question is whether she would return, though she had filed her nomination papers. Nobody, even inside her own party, seems to be sure of her return to Pakistan, though there is much expectation, like in 1986, that she would return and lead the Party in the forthcoming elections. In 1986, Benazir returned from London much against the wishes of the military ruler Zia-ul Haq and led her party to win the elections. However, even her party members agree, 2002 is not 1986. When she returned in 1986, a series of events followed inside Pakistan, which was helpful to Benazir and her party. On the internal front, Zia was killed in an aircrash and the military regime lacked a cohesive policy thereafter. On the external front, the war in Afghanistan was reaching an end after Gorbachev’s entry; the subsequent end of the Cold War, reduced the significance of the Pakistan military in the US strategic calculus. Today, the scene is different. Musharraf is seen as a close ally in the American war on terrorism and it is unlikely that there will be any support for the return of democracy within Pakistan, at the cost of its relationship with the military regime. Besides, Benazir is also not the same person now as she was in 1986. She was then seen as a young and clean politician and people were openly supporting her return. Today, her image has been considerably tainted and there is not much enthusiasm for her outside her party. Though there is considerable dis-satisfaction among the people against the military regime, this has yet to get translated into pro-Benazir sentiments.

     Given these conditions, Benazir is also confused whether she should return or not. She is well aware that her presence inside Pakistan would benefit her party, but she is also aware that she would be arrested the moment she enters Pakistan. Now the question is whether she could transform her arrest and detainment in her favour; and whether she would be able to stir up public sympathy into votes for her party.

     Her return would undoubtedly help her party in the forthcoming elections, irrespective of her being arrested. Psychologically, it would boost the image of the PPP (now PPPP) as also her personal image. By sitting a thousand miles away from Pakistan and functioning through remote control will not help her individually nor her party collectively. Benazir is aware of this factor.

     But what is weighing in her mind is the lack of any international support. If there is even some guarantee by influential powers that they would ensure that the elections are conducted freely and she gets a fair trial, she would return. This guarantee, given the significance of the military regime to the US led war against terrorism, is unlikely.

     Will she return? Only she knows. And she is confused.

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet