Home Contact Us  

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3581, 27 February 2012
Creating New Provinces in Pakistan: A Print Media Analysis
Priyanka Dutta Chowdhury
Research Intern, IPCS
email: priyanka953@gmail.com

With the Pakistani general election around the corner, the debate on creation of new provinces in Pakistan is gaining momentum among the political parties and the media. Demands include the creation of Hazara and Seriaki provinces, partitioning of the Pakhtun areas of Balochistan and merging them with the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province, division of the Sindh province, and enabling the creation of Karachi as a separate federal unit. This article attempts to sum up the arguments on the issue drawing from the viewpoints of three prominent Pakistani dailies: Dawn, Daily Times and The News International. The most outstanding question is whether “the debate is a serious attempt at resolving a contentious issue or an exercise in point-scoring and obtaining political mileage.” (The debate on new provinces, Abrar Kazi and Zulfiqar Halepoto, Dawn, 10 January 2012).

The debate
The demand for more provinces and provincial autonomy re-emerged with the coming of the new government and the passing of the 18th amendment in the year 2010. The dream of creating a new province was seen as translating into reality in the Seraiki-speaking area when the Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani stated that his government was determined to set up a new province in the Seraiki belt. Gilani said “creation of new provinces was the need of the hour and if a Saraiki province was not created during the tenure of a Saraiki-speaking prime minister, when would it happen, if ever?” (The issue of new provinces, Editorial, Daily times, 5 January 2012) Also, the Punjab Governer Sardar Latif Khan Khosa said that the long deprived area of southern Punjab must get its due share. The demand for new provinces has led to a coalition between the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid-e-azam (PMLQ), who are the advocates of Southern Punjab and Hazara provinces respectively. However, this part of the political discourse has often been seen as a bargaining tool used by the PPP in Punjab, where Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is already running the show. (Move for Seraiki province gains momentum, Khawar Ghumman, Dawn, 3 August 2011)

Similar demands have also arisen from the Hazara Province Movement Committee (HPMC) which propounds the creation of the Hazara province. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf also considers the creation of the Hazara province a topmost priority. The Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) is keen on the creation of the new provinces Hazara and Seraiki, which they say will help to eliminate differences. This has led to a rift among the Awami National Party (ANP) and the MQM, as the members of ANP feel this is nothing but a political stunt by the MQM, which enjoys zero representation in the provincial assemblies of both Pakhtunkhwa and Hazara.

The question is whether the provinces should be made on an administrative basis or on ethno-linguistic lines. In the words of Mazar Arif, “New provinces, if created, will in fact be new ‘federating units’ representing social, cultural, linguistic and historical values and the aspirations of their respective peoples in the federation of Pakistan.”  This complements the cultural and linguistic rights guaranteed under the constitution. (Seraiki province debate, Dawn, 15 August 2011).

Favouring the demand for federation, specially on the basis of ethno-linguistics, Dr Tariq Rahman said such a move would “reduce ethnic conflict, prevent Punjab from dominating the smaller federating units, make administration efficient, ensure that people do not have to travel long distances to get justice, and give all units a stake in the system.” (Linguistics and new provinces, Dawn, 9 July 2009).

However, many have also registered their reservations. Saleem Safi opines that provinces based on the criterion of ethnicity would cause further destabilization. Adopting this yardstick would push Balochistan to demand some regions currently under the administrative control of Sindh and Punjab to be declared its integral parts. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa will scramble to obtain the western parts of Balochistan. Such reorganization will not get Hazaras the status of a new province as most of the Hindko-speaking tribes there are ethnic Pakhtuns. A linguistic division will also become problematic as no part of the country can be declared a single language unit. (Make new provinces, The News International, 26 April 2010).

Parties like ANP, PML-N, and the army are in support of the creation of new provinces done in a constitutional and democratic way on an administrative basis and with having an equal formula (based on population, area, resources, sources of income etc) that will be applicable to all parts of the country.

The opposition leaders feel that the provinces should not come into being as a result of political jugglery where the parties are trying to divert the attention of the people from issues like shortage of gas, power and price hike.

Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and the Sindhi nationalists are against the creation of new provinces. This is because the former thinks that in the wake of the financial crisis the division of the country should be kept aside, while the latter fears that MQM is trying to divide Sindh by flexing its muscles in the interiors after having gained considerable influence in urban areas.

The concerns
The creation of new provinces must take into consideration the concerns of the people rather than being just a political stunt for the election. The proponents for the creation of provinces should also pay respect to the constitution’s Article 239 (4) which “lays down that no bill to amend the constitution that would have the effect of altering the limits of a province can be presented to the president for assent unless it has been passed by the provincial assembly of that province by a two-thirds majority. It then also requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of parliament in order to pass muster.” (The issue of new provinces, Editorial, Daily Times, 5 January 2012). Such an important matter of carving out provinces mandates the active participation of both political parties and civil society.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Radha Vinod Raju,
"Pakistan: Will Democracy Prevail?," 9 January 2012
Aryaman Bhatnagar,
"Pakistan: The Imran Khan Phenomenon," 5 January 2012
Prof. Satish Kumar,
"A Moment of Hope or Despair in Pakistan?," 4 May 2010
Rekha Chakravarthi,
"Pakistan Elections 2008: Implications for Pakistan and India," 1 April 2008

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February  March
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.