Home Contact Us  
   

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3366, 3 May 2011
 
After Osama - II: Full Marks to President Obama?
Ashok Bhan
Former Director General of Police, Jammu & Kashmir
email: bhan.ashok@gmail.com
 

The death of Osama bin Laden in a surgical operation carried out by the US Special Forces will be a subject of discussion among political and security analysts the world over for many weeks to come. However, the events leading to  this success story, that have unfolded within 12 hours of the operation, is a case study imparting a number of important lessons in political courage and professional finesse not only during the operation but the post-incident handling and needs to be captured now. Debates and post-mortems sometime tend to cloud this first impression.

President Obama deserves full marks for risking his political career by signing off, on April 29, on orders that authorized the operation. A task of this magnitude, an action in an alien territory based on intelligence reports about the presence of the world’s most wanted fugitive, who had once been declared dead by no less a person than the former Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf, would have been difficult to accomplish without a necessary amount of risk. Lesser mortals may have preferred verbal orders to allow an escape route in the event of failure. The US President showed faith in his advisors, confidence in the capabilities of those who were to carry out the orders and created a moral obligation from his team towards himself. And indeed they did not let him down.

Within 8 hours of the operation President Obama, with confidence and poise, announced the death of the mastermind of 9/11. Remember, the operation was carried out during the night in Pakistan. Yet the US agencies had arrangements at hand (without any visible support from the host nation) to prove beyond any shadow of doubt that they had killed Osama. And the President was able to utilize this opportunity to send across the important message that America’s war was against terrorism and not Islam. Had it taken longer to prove Osama’s identity, there would have been no Presidential statement until the next morning, spawning many versions of and speculations about the event. The impact would have been lost. An emotionally choked young lady, who had served and was injured in Afghanistan, joined the celebrations in Washington DC, and claimed she could see a new White House, one over which the clouds of 9/11 had finally dissipated. The crowds were chanting ‘USA, USA’ and a second term for Obama. Obama has thus given a new meaning to the responsibilities of a Chief Executive, US capabilities and its resolve against terrorism.

The master stroke in the entire operation was to remove the body of Laden from Pakistan before the native authorities got a whiff of it. All hell would have been let loose if the body had been seized by Pakistani authorities. All kinds of legal wrangling and pressure on the already fragile security situation could arise. World focus would have shifted to live coverages of the dead body and radicals could have exploited this situation. However, within 12 hours, the body is learnt to have been buried with religious rites in the Arabian Sea. The operation itself, the removal of the dead body and the last rites speak volumes about the precision with which the plan was made and executed.

The operation’s secrecy was the biggest asset that led to this success. It is clear that for fear of leakage, no Pakistani authority was kept in the loop. Sharing of information would have been suicidal. It is highly unlikely that the Pakistani Army was unaware of the presence of Laden in the mansion built in 2005, with walls 12-18 feet high, topped off with barbed wire, and less than a kilometre away from the Military Academy. What surprises is the complacency that had set in among those privy to his presence that no one could reach Osama. As the initial reactions show, even the NATO allies were informed after the operation was over.

As for the operation itself, how did the choppers avoid Pakistani radars? Even after one helicopter crashed, a contingency plan was in place. It is immaterial whether it was accidental or was fired at. What is important is that it did not impair the operation and the US troops were even able to explode the crashed copter so as to not leave any remains. The loss of a helicopter could have led to chaos in a less professional team. In 40 minutes, despite the helicopter accident, a precise and successful surgical operation was carried out. Subesequently, one is likely to hear and read volumes about the execution of this immaculately planned operation. However, important lessons from the expert handling of the situation in the first 12 hours post Osama’s death have already emerged.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
PR Chari,
"Why Berlin is not Prague-II," 24 June 2013
Shanta Maree Surendran,
"China, Gwadar and Sea Lanes of Communication: ‘Economic Offence’ or ‘Active Defence’?," 25 February 2013
D Suba Chandran,
"Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents," 15 January 2012
Poonam Khatana,
"Cutbacks in US Military Aid to Pakistan: A Print Media Survey," 1 September 2011
PR Chari,
"US-Pakistan-India Equations Post-Obama," 8 June 2011
M Shamsur Rabb Khan,
"The Killing of Shahzad: Links between the al Qaeda and the Pakistan Navy in the Open?," 1 June 2011
D Suba Chandran,
"Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?," 1 June 2011
Arun Sahgal,
"Operation Geronimo: A Game Changer for Pakistan's Military?," 10 May 2011
Gurmeet Kanwal,
"Emulate Operation Abbottabad?: Yes India Can," 6 May 2011
Abhijit Iyer-Mitra,
"Emulate Operation Abbottabad?: No India Can’t," 6 May 2011

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
J&K: Need for an Urgent Review

Forecast 2016: Jammu and Kashmir Politics and Security

J&K Election Verdict: For Integration, Not Assimilation

Floods in J&K: Hatred, Alienation and Relief Measures

J&K: Forthcoming Elections and the Peace Process

J&K: Declining Violence, But Challenges Galore

On Custodial Deaths and Fake Encounters

Boston Bombings: Lessons for India

Book Review: Addressing the Psychosocial Paradigms of Terrorism

Challenge for Leaders in J&K: Restore Shrinking Political Space

J&K: In Search of a ‘Starting Point’ to Break the Impasse

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.