Home Contact Us  

Pakistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1336, 15 March 2004
Afghan Refugees in Pakistan and Their Post-9/11 Developments in Repatriation
R Ramasubramanian
School of International Studies, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry

Present-day Pakistan has been a haven for refugees from ancient times and many peoples have passed through this land, Afghans have been the single largest group. Afghan refugees had fled to Pakistan in 1978, after a communist government seized power in Kabul. This influx mushroomed after the Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan in December 1979, growing to more than four million in the 1980s. The Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan in 1989, but significant numbers of refugees did not return home until the Afghan insurgents ousted the Soviet-installed Najibullah regime in 1992. Repatriation was very slow because of infighting among the various insurgent factions. In the mid-1990s, the radical Islamist Taliban faction seized control of southern Afghanistan and Kabul. Taliban offensives in northern Afghanistan thereafter, sent hundreds of thousands of new refugees into Pakistan and Iran and displaced large numbers of people within Afghanistan. By the end of the decade, the Taliban controlled 95 percent of Afghanistan, forcing thousands more Afghans to move to Pakistan.

Most Afghan refugees in Pakistan are ethnic Pashtuns. It has become impossible to determine the number of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. Not all Afghans refugees register themselves. Many come and go informally; births and deaths go untracked. During the late 1990s, the UNHCR estimated the Afghan population living in the refugee villages in Pakistan to be 1.2 million for planning purposes but noted that as many as 2 million other Afghans were in Pakistan without documentation. In 2000, the government of Pakistan officially estimated the total Afghan refugee population as 2 million (1.2 million in refugee camps and the remainder in urban centers).

The Pakistani government designates Afghans who entered Pakistan before 1998 to be refugees, although few have document of their status. However, Pakistan views Afghans who entered after 1998 as illegal immigrants, unless they came with a valid travel document or visa, in which case they are permitted to remain in Pakistan legally as visitors, not refugees. The UNHCR considers all Afghans in Pakistan to be refugees, "with the exception of those for whom individual status determination has been carried out and who have either been found to be refugees or have been excluded as per the terms of the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol."

A new Afghan refugee influx began in June 2000 and accelerated in October of that year. Pakistan officially closed its border to new Afghan refugees on 9 November 2000, but many Afghans continued to enter by avoiding the main border crossings. UNHCR estimated that more than 172,000 Afghans, mostly members of ethnic minorities, entered Pakistan during the last half of 2000. In early 2001, the government of Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP), with the acquiescence of the national government, embarked on a policy of mass refoulement (forced return of refugees). On 23 January 2001, the governor of NWFP authorized the police to detain and deport any Afghan not holding a valid Afghan passport and Pakistani visa, including both new arrivals and long-term refugees. In June, a UNHCR spokesperson said that many Afghan refugees were "living in a state of fear." Pakistan's deportation of urban Afghan refugees continued throughout the year.

Soon after 11 September 2001, US President George Bush linked the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington to the Afghanistan-based Al Qaeda organization and made clear that the United States would take retaliatory military action. Even before the U.S. military attack began Afghans had begunn fleeing into Pakistan. The pace of new arrivals accelerated, when the U.S. military began bombing in and around Kabul and other Afghan cities. But a mass influx did not materialize, because Pakistan kept its borders sealed, trapping tens of thousands of people within Afghanistan. The Pakistani authorities also blocked the UNHCR and other relief groups from assisting the estimated 160,000 Afghans. The Pakistani instance was motivated by fears that millions of Afghans would enter if Pakistan opened its borders, that the international community would lose interest in the refugees (as it had in the past) and not honor its pledge to meet the costs of assisting them, and that Pakistan would ultimately be saddled with even more refugees.

The 2003 UNHCR report says that more than 2.2 million Afghan refugees, including some 200,000 who arrived during 2001 and about 18,000 refugees of other nationalities are in Pakistan. The UNHCR has recognized only 4,592 Afghans as refugees, mostly persons seeking resettlement in countries outside the region. Pakistan forcibly returned an estimated 3,000 Afghan refugees in 2001 while as many as 65,000 Afghans returned voluntarily from Pakistan. Among the latter group were an estimated 45,000 others who went back after the US-led military action in Afghanistan resulted in the ouster of the ruling Taliban regime.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
FDI in Retail: Survival of The Fittest or Revival of The Caveat?

Ceasefire, Peace Process and War Clouds in Sri Lanka

South Asian Parliament: Unrealistic Proposal or Possible Prospect?

India and the Afro-Asian Summit

EU, China, Arms Embargo and India's Reticence

Enough of SA(A)RCasm: Venture New Directions

India's Tsunami diplomacy

Strategic and Strengthened partnership: Recent Initiatives in EU- India Relations

Failed Attempt: Suicide Attack or Peace Process?

Can Environmental Security Bring Peace to Jammu and Kashmir? – II

Can Environmental Security Bring Peace to Jammu and Kashmir? – I

Human Smuggling in Sri Lanka

The Stranded Pakistanis: Statelessness in Bangladesh

Refugee Influx and Environmental Impact in South Asia

Kalam assures peaceful return to Kashmiri Migrants

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.