Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Nuclear - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#2424, 23 November 2007

The Day After 'Cold Start'

Firdaus Ahmed
Freelancer
e-mail: firdyahmed@yahoo.com

India's 'Cold Start' doctrine was released by the then Army Chief, Gen NC Vij, during the Army Commanders Conference on 28 April 2004. Subsequent media discussion suggests that it visualized early launch of Indian forces in multiple 'integrated battle groups', including an air component, in a Limited War to destroy enemy forces.

In the latest air exercise, Ex Abhyas, Western Air Command is believed to have practiced 'hitting the political will' of the adversary to ensure 'clear cut advantages' at the termination of the conflict. This would presumably be on the lines of the two Gulf Wars in rendering the enemy defenseless by first knocking out its air force and then destroying its forces, infrastructure and 'value' targets piecemeal. From this it appears that two wars would be simultaneously fought - the land war dictated by 'Cold Start,' and the air power's deep battle. Against this backdrop it is worth examining whether the day after 'Cold Start' would, indeed, unfold as intended.

On how Pakistan might counter India's 'pro-active' storm, three aspects need highlighting.

One is the sociology of the Pakistani state; its foremost characteristic has been unveiled as 'Milbus' by Ayesha Siddiqa Agha (Military Inc. - Inside Pakistan's Military Economy). The term 'Milbus,' by fusing military-business, describes the predatory nature of the praetorian Pakistani state in which the military extracts state resources by penetrating the economy through commercial activities in the guise of 'welfare,' and thereby perpetuates its domination of the state. This fact influences the decision whether and how the Pakistani military responds to the call of battle. The primary consideration would be retaining power post-hostilities over its own society.

The second factor -nuclear capability - would permit Pakistan to utilize deterrence, since it is suspicious of India's doctrine of limited penetration. In the event, Indian forces would advance into a vacuum. Besides, in light of Limited War theory, status quoist India would have limited aims, confined to punitive action when provoked past its 'tolerance threshold', rather than to acquire territory or seek regime change.

The last factor is an asymmetric response in occupied areas. President Musharraf is on record saying that unconventional warfare would be used against Indian troops. Collateral damage is unlikely to lessen the magnitude of this threat. On India's departure, Pakistan could claim victory with its relatively well preserved military reinforced in power, while India would have the satisfaction of having drawn blood.

This tame visualization of the 'day after' is not complicated by the effect of the second war India would simultaneously be fighting by its deeper strategic application of air power. Driving the Pakistani air force out of the reckoning would enable an open season for India's air power. Thereafter, with the Gulf Wars as the precedent, 'hitting political will' would involve targeting decision makers, infrastructure destruction and forcing the Pakistani Army into giving battle.

The likely effect on national morale and political resolve can best be assessed by recourse to the effect of the air campaigns in World War II. In the short term this would register a rise; but lack of time would preclude everything else. Indian satisfaction would come from administering a deep wound in return for the 'thousand cuts' received. Staying on for a more telling air campaign may have an Iraq style backlash on the land front, besides only making the rubble bounce to no strategic purpose.

The complication lies in the violence unleashed through air power. Press reports from Ex Abhayas indicate that the intention is to 'mobilize fast and strike hard' (Times Of India, 15 September 2007). The psychological effect on the battle space encompassing all of Pakistani territory, in conjunction with the entire length of land borders coming alive at the very outbreak of hostilities, would be disconcerting. Air and missile strikes on strategic targets, particularly those degrading Pakistani nuclear deterrent, would be seen as most threatening. In the bargain, the 'use it or lose it' dilemma would appear, and Pakistan would be driven to nuclear use early in the conflict. In this surcharged atmosphere it may be forced to do so, if India forces its hands by lack of moderation in using air power. This would unintentionally drive both states into terrain neither wishes to traverse.

It is not known to what extent the joint doctrine released by the Defense Minister at the Unified Commanders Conference of 17 May 2006 has integrated air power with such intended use of land power. The joint doctrine needs to evolve in this direction. The Army's 'Cold Start' doctrine is sensitive to the compulsions of Limited War, hence the strategic employment of India's air and missile capabilities must also be tempered.

Rate this Article

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
 
Article by same Author
Rescuing Tribal India: The Nagaland Model
AFSPA in J&K: Why should it go?
Interrogating Security Expansionism in India
Compellence, Deterrence or Defence?: Saxena Task Force and India’s Defence Reforms
After Osama - VII: Should New Delhi Engage Pakistan or ‘Wait and Watch’?
An Indian Anti-Nuclear Peace Movement
Revisiting Intelligence Reform
The Indian Army: Organizational Changes in the Offing
Blast from the Past - The Varanasi Explosion
AfPak: Beginning of an End?
India’s COIN Policy: ‘Peace Preceding Talks’?
Jammu and Kashmir: Need for a Political Solution
Countering the Naxal Threat-IV: Military as an Option?
Revisiting ‘1971’
The Bright Side of ‘Asymmetric Escalation’
Questioning Defence Spending
India at 60: Acquiring Escape Velocity?
Making Obama's War Also India's
An Issue in Civil-Military Relations
Disarmament in South Asia
Emulating the US
The 'Vision Thing'
Kargil: Ten Years On
From ‘No First Use’ to ‘No Nuclear Use’
Agenda for the Next Government
Rethinking Civilian Control
A Strategy for ‘Af-Pak’
Not Quite an Empty Threat
The Counter Narrative on Terror
National Security Adviser: Reviewing the Institution
A Roadmap for Kashmir
Afghanistan: Appraising the Future
The Lesson from Sam Bahadur's Triumph
The Myth of 'Weapons of Peace'
Getting it Right: Rereading India's Nuclear Doctrine
Reconceptualizing Internal Security
Musharraf and the 'TINA' Factor
Understanding Minority-Perpetrated Terrorism
For a Return to Lahore
Haldighati II: Implications for Internal Security
Tackling Intervention in South Asia
Querying India's Grand Strategy
Kargil: Back in the News
In the Line of Fire: Pakistan Army
Pakistan's Possible Nuclear Game Plan
Menu for the New Chief
For a Paradigm Shift
Addressing the 'Central' Issue
'No' To 'Cold Start'
The Price of Malgovernance
The Price of Misgovernance
The Police and the Example of the Armed Forces
Missiles and Crisis Stability
Widening the Discourse on Terror
The Post-Parakram Peace Agenda
Indian Peacekeeping in Iraq?
The ‘Peace Initiative’: A Tactical Gambit
The Sole ‘Lesson’ of the Iraq War
Muslim India as ‘Threat’
For a Return to Clausewitz
Preparing for ‘Limited Nuclear War’
The General Did Not Bite!
Lessons from India’s Kashmir Engagement
The Logic of Nuclear Redlines
A Smoke Screen Called Limited War
‘Terrorism’ and Intellectual Responsibility
The Need to Revisit Conventional Doctrine
Moving Beyond Realism
Lessons from the Present Crisis
The Impetus behind Limited War

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.