Home Contact Us  

Nuclear - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1684, 29 March 2005
North Korea and China's Predicaments
Reshmi Kazi
Research Officer, IPCS

North Korea's declaration on 10 February 2005 that it has "manufactured nukes" for self-defence and subsequent withdrawal from the six-party talks has put China in a quandary. Pyongyang has apparently become the world's ninth nuclear power. In a December 2001 report, the CIA assessed that Pyongyang had produced two nuclear weapons from plutonium extracted from spent reactor fuel. A CIA assessment of August 2003 indicated Pyongyang reprocessed 8000 spent fuel rods stored at Yongbyon believed to contain 25-30 kg of plutonium. This would be sufficient to build 5-6 warheads, assuming that each warhead needs 5 kg of plutonium.

The Stalinist country's nuclear brinkmanship has deeply embarrassed Beijing - the host of the six-party talks. China responded to Pyongyang's declaration by reiterating its hopes for a denuclearized Korean Peninsula, exhorting the communist state to resume negotiations. China expressed concern that, if the six-party talks were allowed to drift, it would endanger the security dynamics of Northeast Asia. Though Beijing has pledged to work "with a sense of urgency" to bring Pyongyang back to the negotiating table, can China deliver what it promises?

North Korea and China being historical allies were often considered "as close as lips to teeth". During the Cold War, Pyongyang was viewed as China's first line of defence and strategic buffer zone against the US. Their camaraderie was obvious during the Korean War (1950-53). Beijing is also the main supplier of food and energy to Pyongyang. At present, however, China is severely constrained by several factors that prevents it from using its leverage against Pyongyang.

China is deeply concerned about a North Korean refugee crisis. The growing number of North Koreans along its northeastern border poses a threat of demographic instability to China. Northeastern China is an industrial rust belt where unemployment is acute. As these refugees migrate to Beijing, the message to those remaining in impoverished North Korea is mass exodus to China. Beijing is extremely wary of this influx of refugees into its own territory, and this was the prime impetus for providing aid to Pyongyang. Presently, the mainland provides one million tons of crude oil and another 150,000-200,000 tons of refined products to Pyongyang every year. Beijing also sends US$ 500 mn to US$ 1 bn worth of energy aid (fuel) to the North every year.

China is deeply focused on reaching its internal economic development goals, which face the threat of disruption from a possible collapse of the North Korean regime. In the event of a breakdown of Kim Jong II's regime, Seoul, which is China's major foreign direct investor, will be compelled to channellize its investments for the reconstruction of North Korea. China seeks to increase its per capita GDP to US$ 3000 by 2020. Any disruption in direct foreign aid will jeopardize attainment of its economic goals. North Korea is aware of these dynamics, which constitutes another reason for China to safeguard its stability.

China has an interest therefore in the resumption of the six-party talks, which have enhanced its international prestige, and earned it the reputation of being a global supporter of disarmament. China's influence is more effective since America does not want to hold any dialogue with Pyongyang. The more influence China is able to wield, the more US will be soft on China's claim to Taiwan and its human rights record. However, Pyongyang's intractable nature has placed China in a bind. Pyongyang is aware that its participation is invaluable in the six-party talks and is using this as an instrument to extract economic aid and fuel from Beijing, which fears an impoverished country brandishing nuclear weapons on its border. This puts a strict leverage on China's influence.

China is also deeply perturbed by North Korea's nuclear posture threatening the security dynamics of Northeast Asia. A Nodong missile carrying a nuclear warhead could hit Tokyo or Osaka in less than ten minutes. Pyongyang's nuclear weapons also pose a threat to Seoul. North Korea's formidable nuclear posture will enhance regional insecurities in the Korean Peninsula that would inevitably up the nuclear ante in Northeast Asia.

China's assurance of bringing Pyongyang back to the six-way talks is deeply affected by these factors. Though China has tried to use its leverage in the past by stopping oil supplies in 2003 and closing down a well-established Chinese academic journal - Strategy and Management - for publishing a highly critical article about Pyongyang in 2004, such actions did not bring about the intended results. Pyongyang's nuclear blackmail has deepened Beijing's diplomatic quagmire. The coming weeks will determine China's reputation as an emerging great power and a stabilizing influence in Northeast Asia.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Bio-terror: Grave Implications of Synthetic Biology

Nuclear Forensics: A Tool for Deterring Terrorists?

AQ Khan and Nuclear Non-Proliferation

The Berman Letter: Time for Creative Diplomacy

NSG Waiver - A Diplomatic Gesture

Reliable Replacement Warheads: A Dangerous Expansion

Nuclear Tests: India Cannot Foreclose the Option

The North Korean Accord: A Step Towards Nuclear Disarmament

India-Russia Nuclear Cooperation: A Balance of Interests

Japan's Support for the Indo-US Nuclear Deal: A Step Towards a Safer World

Indo-US Nuclear Deal: A New Strategic Partnership

North Korea Nuclear Accord: A Game Of Diplomacy

India: A Responsible Nuclear Power

Proliferation Security Initiative and India

Reducing Nuclear Danger

India's Naval Aspirations

Shaping Nuclear Confidence

Shaheen-II Test: Ramifications for India

Nuclear Impasse in the Korean Peninsula

Halting the Nuclear Trade

Pakistanís Nuclear Linkages with Iran

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October  November  December
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.