Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Nepal - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#1562, 17 November 2004
 
Political Issues in Nepal ( Nepal Media Survey - October 2004)
P G Rajamohan
Institute for Conflict Management
 

Political Dilemma

Deshantar (3 October) in its report severely indicted the Communist Party of Nepal (UML) leader, Madhav Kumar Nepal's changing statements on the issue of unilateral ceasefire during the Dashain and Tihar festival period. Quoting the frequent changes in his statements, the report said "these contradictions are typical of UML General Secretary. He never remains consistent for even a single day." Further it says, "for many people this is a survival tactic. But it left his own party men wondering why Nepal is flip-flopping like that." The inability of the Government to convince the people about the future prospects of peace, the law and order situation and the price control, made Nepal sometimes offensive at times and  defensive at others. In its opinion, "'with contradictory statements on the unilateral ceasefire, he is trying to please both the government and the people."

Indian Push Against Maoists

In Himal Khabarpatrika (2-16 October), Arjun Gyawali writes that India did not take the Maoists' problem very seriously, when an American political analyst warned about the growing influence of the insurgents' movement in the region five years back. Citing India's changed policies on the insurgents, the Maoists Central Committee decided to move their underground base from India to Nepal during their last meeting, which indicates that they have lost all hope of using India as a refuge. Arun opines that "this might be the main reason why the rebel leaders are pushing for peace talks with the government and India has a major role to put them under pressure." Since Prime Minster Sher Bahadur Deuba's official visit to India, the Maoists have been lambasting the Indian government and it is believed that they are preparing a new military model to counter the Indian action. As a new strategy to gain international support and secure refugee status for their arrested senior leaders like Kiran, CP Gajurel, Matrika Yadab, Suresh Ale Magar and other central level leaders detained in India, the Maoists have been gradually spreading their political ideals in several European countries. Referring to the Maoist-established links in America, Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, UK, Italy and other countries in Europe, Arjun says, "Maoists would use their links to pressurize India to release their leaders."

Maoists Demo

Maoist cadres conducted a demonstration, wearing combat fatigues and brought out their most prized weapons - GPMGs, SLR and Mortars - for a Media photo shoot at Babichaur near Surket. The Himal Khabarpatrika (17 October - 15 November), said Maoist cadres posed for photographs at a clearing, tightening their jaws and pretending to aim the weapons at the surrounding jungle. Watching his men from the sidelines, the rebel's central committee member and the Seti-Mahakali regional bureau in-charge, Lekh Raj Bhatta, or Comrade Rakesh explained, "We are now moving from a domestic class struggle to a national liberation war," and added "Our priority is to remove Indian troops from Kalapani, by force if necessary." Quoting another central committee member and a western division commissar, Comrade Pratik, it said: "We shall use diplomatic and political pressure to get the Indians out of Kalapani, but if that doesn't work we will use military force." The report maintained it was hard to say whether all this tough talk was a pressure tactic to obtain the release of more than a dozen of their senior comrades arrested in India in the past year, or whether it was for real. Also it opines, by turning attention towards an outside enemy, Maoists may be trying to shore up waning domestic support for their movement. At the same time the Maoist analysis seems to be that there is no immediate threat from US. Quoting rebel leaders, it says that they are mobilizing Indian Maoists and other allies in India to pressurize New Delhi.

Democracy at Peril?

In Kantipur (27 October), political analyst Lok Raj Baral says that there is no strength in the argument that the country will witness far-reaching democratic reforms once parliament is restored. He writes, "to solve the present crisis, what we need is a peaceful movement, which means that the political forces need to work together and make their objectives clear." The role of working unity among political parties becomes even more crucial when it concerns the insurgency because the king wants to protect his traditional powers while the rebels are fighting to end it.  He further opines "As long as the monarchy believes that traditional rights are the basis of its power, democracy in Nepal will always remain ambiguous...without a logical end to this traditional power struggle between the King and parliamentary parties, the Maoist problem will not end." Apart from the Maoist insurgency, issues in democratic politics like the King's status, the state structure of the Maoists, and the meeting point between the rebels and parliamentary political parties are yet to be resolved. In his opinion, the "meeting point of all the forces in the country is the reconstruction of the state. It is toward this end that all quarters must work together."

 
Article by same Author
Nepal: State in Disarray

Post-Election Challenges in Nepal

Negotiating with the Terai groups

Constituent Assembly Elections in Nepal

Suicide Terrorism - South Asia 2006

Managing Arms and Armies in Nepal: Need for Caution

Nepal: Disturbances in Terai

Nepal: Issues Regarding Maoists-Parties Understanding

Elections in Nepal: Major Issues and Questions

Situation in Nepal post-1 February (Nepal Media Survey - April 2005)

Nepal Media Survey, February 2005

The Nepalese Media Survey (January 2005)

Between Monarchy and the Maoists (Nepal Media Survey, December, 2004)

Uprising against Maoists (Nepal Media Survey, November 2004)

India-Nepal Linkage (Media Survey, September 2004)

Nepal Media Survey (1-31 August 2004)

Hizb-ut-Tahrir-al-Islami: Profile of a New Suicide Terror in Central Asia

Ideological Incompatibility: The Arbitrary Removal of Governors

Turmoil in Nepal Continues (Nepal Media Survey, April 2004)

Maoists Strike Hard (Nepal Media Survey, March 2004)

MVA President Killed by Maoists (Nepal Media Survey February 2004)

Nuclear Proliferation by Pakistan: Implications for the Non-Proliferation Regime and India

Political Debates in Nepal (Nepal Media Survey: January, 2004)

Arms Buildup in Nepal (Nepal Media Survey December 1-31 2003)

Anniversary of Constitution Observed (Nepal Media Survey 1-30 November 2003)

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet