Home Contact Us  

Nepal - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4200, 29 November 2013

Nepal Elections 2013

The Fall of Maoists
Sisir Devkota
Research Intern, IPCS
Email: sisirdevkota@gmail.com

The 2013 CA election in Nepal was a show of vibrant participation, inclusiveness and enthusiasm. Not only was there an increase in people’s representatives, there were also 68 more political parties running for the FPTP (first past the post) and 67 for PR (proportional representation), making the total number of parties contesting 122 this year. The results of around half of the total election constituencies in Nepal has been declared and the third position acquired by the Unified Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist’s (UCPN-M) has been a poor performance given their history and stature among the major political parties. The nature of the second round of Constituent Assembly election results in Nepal has once again provided the message of the Nepali population’s reluctance in giving a second chance to non-performers. Failure in the election is not the prime reason for the fall of Maoist party in Nepal. The decline of popularity of the once charismatic leader Prachanda and the party is because of their irrational public statements, miscalculation of people’s aspirations and most importantly, their lack of respect towards the verdict of the Nepali people.

The press conference organised by the UCPN-M right after the initial election results in Nepal showed their impatience, irrationality, and lack of leadership and representation of the Nepali people. The press conference was called to defy the election process and to demand the halt of the vote count. It was not that people in Nepal did not anticipate such a situation; however, reflecting on Prachanda’s commitment to respect the CA results a week before the elections in a television interview shows their unprofessionalism as a political party. The voter turnout was more than 70 per cent this time; the highest recorded percentage in Nepali history. UCPN-M has not only disrespected the Nepali verdict but has also displayed their impatience - the people will now seriously question their governance ability. The CA results will soon be forgotten but it is difficult to say if they will garner substantial public support in the future elections of Nepal.

UCPN-M has failed as a party not only because of their inability to secure minimal seats – a closer look at the margin of their defeat will reveal an embarrassing picture. The wins by other political parties have been comprehensive. That also means that UCPN-M performed poorly in many constituencies and was unable to give any serious competition to the opposition. Prachanda was comprehensively defeated by a comparatively less popular leader of the Nepali Congress, that too with huge number of votes. Dahal gathered 12,852 votes whereas Rajan KC who won in Kathmandu-10 constituency received 20,392 votes. This is one of the major defeats of the party as a whole. The Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (CPN-M), which had parted ways with the Unified Maoist Party, did not contest the elections. Prachanda, in his recent interviews, has made statements about how his party could now support the election defiance campaign of the Baidya-led 33 party alliance in Nepal. However, the will of the CPN-M to enter the CA process has recently been evident. In that case, UCPN-M will lose the only support of its ideologically near partner as well. This is how they are on the verge of a flop political future because of their own miscalculations.

Definace of the declaration of results by the UCPN-M has not been welcomed by any international observation groups. Had the ballot boxes been mishandled and stolen as per Maoist allegations, the international observers would have notified the public as well. The Carter Centre along with the European Union (EU) Election Observation Mission has urged UCPN to respect the verdict of the polls. Jimmy Carter, who led the Carter Centre’s observation campaign, even made a public statement on how the Maoist party, if unpleased with the election process, should go to court. Similarly, India, the US and China, all hailed the election as successful. China’s positive remark on the election is another setback for the Maoists. The reaction of the UCPN-M towards the election results also contradicts election ethics, especially when other political parties positively conceded their consecutive defeats in the CA. This has portrayed a negative image of the party in the eyes of the general public. After the failure of the first round of elections in Nepal, the Nepali people have realised the importance of the second CA polls, which will successfully fulfill the process of writing the new constitution. The culture of not being capable to swallow election defeat is not only a weakness but also a negative and undemocratic trait.

With the recent results, the decline of Maoist party in Nepal is certain, and it is due to their inability to respect the people’s verdict. Among the people who overthrew the monarchy to install republicanism, the political attitude of the UCPN-M is most self-destructive. It is high time for them to reassess their political action and strategies.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Pramod Jaiswal,
"Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide," 6 January 2014
Sisir Devkota,
"Nepal Elections 2013: Return of NC and UML, and the Fall of Maoists and Madhes Parties," 9 December 2013
Sohan Prasad Sha,
"(Un)Making of Madhesi Politics," 28 November 2013
Pramod Jaiswal,
"The Fall of Maoists," 26 November 2013
Pramod Jaiswal,
"Forecasting the Power Composition," 19 November 2013
Sisir Devkota,
"Is there Hope for Madhes?," 11 November 2013

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Five Things that Went Wrong

Nepal Elections 2013: Return of NC and UML, and the Fall of Maoists and Madhes Parties

Sri Lanka & Maldives: Internal Politics, External Relations & India’s Interests

Is there Hope for Madhes?

Misjudged Challenges Ahead

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.