Home Contact Us  

Nepal - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4183, 19 November 2013

Nepal Elections 2013

Deconstructing Madhesi Politics
Sohan Prasad Sha
Research Scholar, School of Social Science, JNU

Since the Jana Andolan of 2006, Nepal has been undergoing a historic transition characterised by dynamism, such as the rise of Madhesi politics, which has been referred as the ‘rise of regional based ethno-nationalism’ (Hachhetu, 2007).

Madhesi politics was popularised after the Madhes uprising of 2007 that led to a region-based national discourse on restructuring Nepal to assure federalism. Moreover, it focused on issues of historical discrimination against Madhesi people at the national level. The impact of this was seen in the CA-I election, in which Madhesi parties were significantly victorious. New political parties emerged from the social movement in Madhes (Madhesi People’s Right Forum, Nepal, and Terai Madhes Democratic Party) in addition to the already existing Madhes-based parties. A snapshot statistical analysis tends to suggest that Madhesis account for nearly 33 per cent of the population of Nepal while all other communities account for nearly 50 per cent. However, the total proportion of votes that went to the Madhesi parties was merely 11 per cent (approximately). With this, Madhesi political parties were represented in the CA-I election with nearly 87 seats (including FPTP and PR) out of 601 seats in the assembly.

Nevertheless, the rise of Madhesi politics after the CA-I election is significant, especially since for the first time, a Madhesi politician was elected as president of Nepal. The vice-president, too, was Madhesi. In addition, four consecutive governments in Nepal were formed with the support of Madhesi parties, although this also unfortunately cost them by leading to a series of splits. In this context, the crucial question is: would the Madhesi Parties be able to retain the results gained in the previous election? If the Madhesi parties are divided over narrow political interests, how would the Madhesi people vote - for or against?

First, there is a general sense there are too many Madhes-based political parties. There are 122 political parties contesting elections for CA-II in Nepal, and of these, Madhesi parties are nearly 30. There are about nine political parties (Two of TMDP, two of SP, three of MPRF, Federal Sadabhavana Party and National Madesh Socialist Party) that have some impact in Madhes. In Nepal, the process of forming political parties is extremely dynamic, which makes analysis very difficult. In Madhes, there are 4,000 candidates contesting an election for 116 seats under first-past-the-post (FPTP). This further complicates the process of predicting an election outcome.

Second, whether the Madhesi parties are able to retain the seats won during the CA-I election is a Pandora’s Box – nothing can be done except to wait for the results of the CA-II elections. Thus, this uncertainty is also considered problematic for psephologists’ calculations. Madhesi political parties are raising some major political concerns, such as inclusive/representative democracy, distribution of resources, doing away with a monolithic hill-centric nationalism to inclusive citizenship, devolution of power from caste of high hills elites (CHHE) under  a centralised system to a decentralised form of governance under identity-based federalism, rights of self-determination etc. Perhaps these issues would remain crucial points of contention. Until these persist, Madhesi politics will continue to attract attention. To contest an election in Madhes, the major political parties have put forward Madhesi faces. This gives the general sense that the representation of Madhesis would remain intact.

Madhesi Politics: Prospects and Challenges
The emergence of Madhesi politics is a recent phenomena and without a strong historical organisational structure. Madhesi politics is in a process of ‘learning by doing’.

It is interesting to note that even before Nepal can restructure along federal lines, regional parties whose names contain the word ‘federal’ have emerged. Such trends show that the failure of CA-I due to a lack of consensus on federalism is merely postponing the inevitable. Indeed, the complexities of federalism stand still, but the aspirations for federalism, attached to the devolution of power and the quickening of the decentralisation process, continue to grow. The complexity is whether these issues should be seen as prospects or challenges. As the saying goes, “Challenges are what make life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.” 

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Pramod Jaiswal,
"Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide," 6 January 2014
Sisir Devkota,
"Five Things that Went Wrong," 13 December 2013
Pramod Jaiswal,
"Forecasting the Power Composition," 19 November 2013
Sisir Devkota,
"Is there Hope for Madhes?," 11 November 2013
Sisir Devkota,
"Misjudged Challenges Ahead," 31 October 2013
Sohan Prasad Sha,
"The Terai Politics and Madheshi Votes," 12 August 2013

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Nepal: Globalisation and Identity Politics

(Un)Making of Madhesi Politics

Nepal: Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist’s Election Dilemma

The Terai Politics and Madheshi Votes

Nepal: Deciphering Prachanda’s “Trilateral” Strategy to Balance India and China

IPCS Discussion: Contemporary Issues in Naya Nepal

Nepal: Decoding the Constituent Assembly Election-II

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.