Home Contact Us
Search :

Naxalite Violence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2954, 21 August 2009
Review of Chief Ministers' Conference on Naxalism
Devyani Srivastava
Research Officer, IPCS
e-mail: devyani@ipcs.org

The recently concluded conference of chief ministers on internal security, the second this year, followed by a meeting among the seven Naxal-affected states (Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, Orissa, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal), constitutes an essential part of the home minister’s resolve to refurbish internal security and improve the level of preparedness in dealing with internal security threats. Driven by the objective of promoting knowledge and information-sharing between the states, the chief ministers’ conference sought to overcome one of the biggest hurdles in the government’s security apparatus - a lack of inter-state and center-state coordination. Through a process of consultation, the meetings have successfully built a cnsensus on counter-Naxal policy and strategies. Accordingly, the center is drawing up a plan for a military offensive, slated for launch by the end of October. These outcomes apart, conferences of this nature convey a strong message of unity among the political leadership in meeting internal security challenges.

At the same time, given the unsatisfactory attempts made so far by the states in meeting the stated objectives,  skepticism regarding the government’s resolve to counter Naxalism lingers on. These concerns are well-founded, what with the formidable challenges surrounding the oft-repeated two-pronged policy on counter-Naxalism: to subdue the insurgency by force and simultaneously provide aid to accelerate development.

Given the emphasis on police action in fighting the Naxals, the challenges confronting the police force are two-fold - the foremost inherent in police action itself while the other stems from the social and political conditions within which the police operate. Aside from targeting the ‘enemy’ in situations of ambush or direct assault, the ability of the police in identifying the ‘enemy’ from the people at large remains highly underdeveloped in a situation of asymmetrical warfare. This is leading to a high rate of human rights violations, including arbitrary detentions at a time when regaining public confidence has become extremely critical for the police to gain success in the fight against Naxals. The often indiscriminate use of force by the police is precipitated partly by the political interference that influences its recruitment and transfer policies, providing them impunity from law. To ensure autonomy of the police force, the Supreme Court had directed the states, as early as 2006, to establish a Police Establishment Board to look into recruitment and transfer issues. The fact that very few states responded to this directive, reflects the unwillingness of states to take up this issue. Until the culture of impunity enjoyed by the police force is effectively broken, through aggressive prosecution of crimes, cultivation of responsible leadership, and constant efforts at regaining public confidence, measures such as increase in the strength of the police force, setting up more military training colleges and their technological up-gradation are unlikely to reap long-term dividends.

The other aspect of the policy- to foster development as the solution to insurgency, is equally problematic, both on philosophical and practical grounds. The thrust on development must be preceded by debates on the nature of development suitable for a particular region. Importing a capitalist-industrialist model of development into tribal lands ahead of other processes of modernization such as spreading literacy and awareness, is likely to meet with resistance, Naxals or no Naxals. In addition to the construction of roads that is often viewed with skepticism by the locals, building irrigation canals, promoting agriculture and tribal skills are other ways of bringing about develop also need to be emphasized. Apart from this,  the practical problems of pursuing a policy of fast-paced development range from insufficiency of funds and administrative weaknesses to corruption and politicization of development aid. A step to resolve this problem is the issuance of funds by the Centre being made conditional upon performance of the states in dealing with corruption, particularly with regard to transfer policies. The fear that corrupt practices will be exposed if states are refused funds by the Centre can act as an incentive for the state to fulfill its responsibilities.
It thus becomes clear that both the security and development aspects of the government’s policy can be effective only in a political system free of lawlessness, corruption and coercion. As argued elsewhere, for instance, in Sanjib Baruah’s latest book Beyond Counterinsurgency: Breaking the Impasse in Northeast India, strengthening the system of governance must be among the highest priorities for the government in its counterinsurgency strategy. This corresponds with the consensus in literature on counterinsurgency, of the salience of a political solution over a military one. Additionally, Chidambaram’s acceptance of the option of negotiating with the rebels provided they renounce violence, and the successful and relatively peaceful conduct of general elections by the Election Commission even in violence-affected areas, are positive steps. Ultimately, the Centre must ensure that it does not reach a situation of stalemate as in the Northeast where despite stressing on counterinsurgency operations and development aid, violence, disillusionment and impoverishment persist.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Medha Chaturvedi,
"BKI and the Naxals in Punjab: Opportunist Allies?," 18 January 2012
Alankrita Sinha and Namrata Hasija,
"BKI and the Naxals in Punjab: Unlikely Cohorts," 18 January 2012
Firdaus Ahmed,
"Rescuing Tribal India: The Nagaland Model," 5 December 2011
Rajat Kumar Kujur,
"Maoist Encounter: Fall of the Legend," 28 November 2011
Lucy Dubochet,
"Naxal-Affected States: Will the Curse of Natural Resources Be Avoided?," 1 December 2010
Lt. Gen (Retd.) Tej Pathak,
"Armed Forces in Anti-Naxal Operations-I: Identifying the Problem," 15 September 2010
Lt. Gen (Retd.) Tej Pathak,
"Armed Forces in Anti-Naxal Operations-II: Mechanics for Employment," 15 September 2010
Radhakrishna Rao,
"Mines, Tribes and Naxals," 14 September 2010
Medha Chaturvedi,
"Fighting the Naxalites: CRPF is not the Best Option," 17 August 2010
D Suba Chandran,
"Fighting the Naxalites: CRPF is the Best Option," 17 August 2010

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
On Maoist Killings

Maoist Violence and its Limitations

Naxal Attack in Gadchiroli: A Sign of Strength or Weakness?

Policy Options on Pakistan: What India Should Do

Elections in Maoist Heartland

Emerging Trends of Urban Terrorism

Fighting Naxals

Q&A: Terror Tentacles in Karnataka

Q&A: Karzai Threatens Pakistan

Q&A: Attack on Danish Embassy in Islamabad

Mining War in Chhattisgarh

Nayagarh Attack: Maoist Penetration in Orissa

The Swat Offensive

Web of Violence in Jharkhand

Naxals-LTTE nexus in Tamil Nadu: An Alliance in the Making?

Economic Blockade: Will the Maoists' New Strategy Succeed?

The Gorakhpur Blasts: Symptom of a Rising Threat

Naxal Attack with a Vengeance in Chhattisgarh

Suicide Terrorism - Iraq 2006

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com