Home Contact Us
Search :

Naxalite Violence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3151, 15 June 2010
Countering the Naxal Threat-III: Use the CRPF and Avoid the Army
D Suba Chandran
Deputy Director, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi
email: subachandran@gmail.com

There is a growing debate in India to use the military against the Naxalite threat and crush the Maoists. This article argues against such a strategy and recommends using the local police and the CRPF to deal with the Naxal threat.

Three Questions: Under What Circumstances? After What Efforts? Will it Aggravate or Ameliorate?

Under what circumstances should the Army (and the Air force) be used? Also, against whom should it be used? There has never been a debate, when the Army was called in for anti -insurgency operations in India’s Northeast or Jammu and Kashmir. The situation in these two regions warranted its use, as there was a complete break down of governance, with the non-State actors calling for complete independence. It was a question of the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Besides, the militants in these regions were armed to their teeth and supported by external actors.

Have all the other options been explored, before calling for the Army’s help? In India, there are other security forces and options – from State Police to para-militaries. There are cases in which the States have used exclusive security formations, to address the threat of insurgency and extremism. For example, Andhra Pradesh has successfully used the Grey Hounds, while J&K still relies upon the Special Operations Group (SOG). Besides, the State Police has also used irregular formations, for example, the Village Defence Committees (VDCs) in J&K; Salwa Judum was a similar attempt that has become controversial in Chattisgarh. Besides, States have also used surrendered militants – the Ikhwans in J&K, and the SULFA in Assam, as a counter-militancy strategy.

The third question is teleological: Will the use of military help better the situation? What if, the use of military aggravates the situation? Unlike the Police and Paramilitaries, the military’s training is different; it sees issues in black and white. The military is trained in that way for a reason; it would be unwise to expect the military to change its raison d’etre and pursue a different approach. If the military is used in an internal situation, it is bound to create human rights issues.

Three Answers: Situation does not warrant Army Deployment, Other Options Exist and Make use of the CRPF.

Is the Naxal threat comparable to that of India’s Northeast and J&K, in terms of questioning India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity? Is there a complete break down of governance, in the Naxal affected areas, where local institutions cannot function? The Naxal threat has taken deep roots in more than three states and is the single most significant internal security threat, as the Prime Minister has identified. However, the situation does not warrant the use of military, for the following reasons.

The existing options are yet to be fully explored. First and foremost, the political options remain untouched; the basic issue relating to the exploitation of popular sentiments by the Naxal groups is linked with the failure of effective governance and the absence of land reforms. Caste and tribal structures are yet to be broken; worse, there is a strong nexus between the tribal and caste leadership with the political structure, which is preventing any meaningful redistribution of lands and forests. Equally important is the exploitation of the forest wealth by the timber mafia, land sharks and other mining excavations. This is a political and governance issue, which is yet to be tackled at the ground level.

Second, the use of security forces option is not fully exploited. At the State level, there have been enough reports to indicate that local police forces have not been prepared adequately to address the growing challenge. Funds allocated by the federal government for police modernization have not been effectively utilized. Police reforms and proper training need to be carried out immediately. Local Police should be the first and best line of defence. Unfortunately, this potential has not been tapped effectively in the Naxal affected States.

Para-military forces, especially the CRPF is best suited to handle anti-Naxal operations. Despite the failures, the CRPF is evolving and has the potential to become the best counter- insurgency force, not only in India, but all over the world. Unlike the military, the CRPF does not see issues in black and white; they have not been trained in that manner. Moreover, when compared to the military and other Para-military forces like the Border Security Force (BSF), CRPF is a soft force. Third, CRPF is better suited to deal with the Naxal threat, for they do not have the problem of territory and cooperation between the police forces. Since, the Naxal issue is spread over Jharkand, Chattisgarh, Orissa and Andhra Pradesh; there is a need for a central force.

Undoubtedly, the CRPF has met with numerous failures so far in terms of handling the Naxal threat. But, one should give more time and space to this force, as it is evolving, comprising young and energetic officer corps, and is willing to take casualties. The CRPF should be allowed to evolve from within and to adopt measures that are best suited, at the grass roots level.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Firdaus Ahmed,
"Countering the Naxal Threat-IV: Military as an Option?," 21 June 2010
Radha Vinod Raju,
"Countering the Naxal Threat – I: An Analysis of Earlier Efforts," 14 June 2010
Radha Vinod Raju,
"Countering the Naxal Threat – II: a Case for Specialized Units," 14 June 2010
Devyani Srivastava,
"On Maoist Killings," 31 May 2010

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Processes at the cost of peace?

Cost of Peace

Rise of Democratic Anarchists

Don’t steal the election now

Mullah Fazlullah: Challenges to the “Eliminate or Extradite” Approach

The Tahirul Qadri Affair

Dhaka as the Gateway to India’s Look East Policy

Modi, Sharif and the Cross-LoC Interactions

Region by Sub-regions

Civil-Military Equations in Pakistan: Que Sera Sera

End of the Road for Taliban?

Presidential Election: Thus spoke the Afghans

Importance of Jamat-e-Islami

Talks with the Taliban: Endgame for the TTP

And Now, They are Coming for Us

Honouring the Dead

The Demographic Dividend

Pivot, Rebalance and What Next?

Unraveling of FATA

Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?

TTP under Mullah Fazlullah: What Next for the Pakistani Taliban?

Connecting Asia: South Asia as a Strategic Bridge

Talks with the TTP: How Far will the State Go?

Cross-LoC Trade and Our Collective Failure

Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com