Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Military - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#1012, 15 April 2003

War in Iraq: Sea Mines and Mammals

Vijay Sakhuja
Maritime Security Analyst

Sir Galahad, the first British supply ship, carrying aid to Iraq (650 tonnes of food, medicine and fresh water) finally docked at the southern port of Umm Qasr. A minesweeper, few patrol boats, helicopters and hovercraft escorted the vessel indicating that the shipping channel was still not safe for business. The ship had been delayed by the discovery of mines in the channel raising fears that humanitarian aid of vital food and water supplies will not be able to reach the Iraqi people in time and increase the chances of a crisis.

Earlier, a Kuwaiti gunboat had challenged a flotilla of about two-dozen Iraqi dhows, suspected of laying mines off the mouth of the river Khawr al-Zubayr, south of the port of Umm Qasr. The US Fifth Fleet’s Maritime Liaison Office (MARLO) based in Bahrain had alerted merchant shipping that Iraqi naval units/ sympathizers might lay mines or engage in suicide attacks in Gulf waters during the war. This followed the attempted suicide mission by a cargo vessel that came within 800 yards of RFA Sir Bedivere, a coalition fleet auxiliary. The standoff ended after USS Ardent chased the suspected vessel.

Although, a large proportion of the Iraqi navy was destroyed during the 1991 Gulf War, a handful of patrol craft (these have now been destroyed by the coalition forces) were in service along with some 150 small boats. The MARLO advisory also urged mariners to alert the coalition navies of any suspicious activity by smaller vessels or any vessel being forced to lay mines by the Iraqi military. These fears were proved right with the discovery of three tugboats carrying “contact  and “influence  sea mines;  68 mines were found on one tugboat, 50 on a second and 19 on a third boat. The former float on or near the water's surface and explode when struck and the latter detonate by acoustic signatures produced by ships passing nearby.

The mere threat of mine is sufficient to deter any vessel from entering a shipping channel.  Mines laid in the Red Sea in 1984 and the Persian Gulf in 1987 clearly demonstrates the lethality of mines. Several ships were damaged and it needed an international effort to clean the area. 18 merchant ships were damaged in the Red Sea in July 1984 due to mines laid “as an expression of Libyan indignation with Egypt.  During the 1991 Gulf War, USS Princeton and USS Tripoli struck sea mines that cost the US $21.6 million while the cost of the mines was only US $ 11,500.  The sea mines therefore offer the cheapest form of asymmetric warfare.

Meanwhile, the US has deployed specially trained mammals in the Persian Gulf to protect coalition warships against attacks from underwater saboteurs and mines. Dolphins have been trained to swim close to mines and place a marker, minimizing any danger to them. Similarly, Sea Lions are tasked with patrolling the harbours. These are intelligent animals, have sophisticated sonar systems that can detect movement and possess fine directional underwater hearing that works well even in low light visibility. The mammals have been trained at the US Navy's Marine Mammal Programme in San Diego, California.

Mammals are no strangers to combat, having been used by several countries in war. Since the days of Hannibal crossing the Alps, an exotic array of animals like bats, chicken, pigeons, camels have been pressed into military action. Among the mammals, dolphins, Beluga whales, walruses, and sea lions have been trained in locating mines or placing mines on enemy shipping and finding lost torpedoes. During the Vietnam War, the US Navy used dolphins to patrol the water off Vietnam. Coalition troops were on alert for attacks by kamikaze camels strapped with explosives during the recent war in Afghanistan; the mujahideens had employed this tactic against Soviet troops. Reportedly, the US army plans to use chickens atop Humvees to provide early warning against gas attacks.

Similarly, the Soviets had trained dolphins to carry out kamikaze missions. Explosives were strapped to their backs and were trained to blow up enemy submarines. They could distinguish between Soviet and foreign submarines by the sounds of their propellers and were taught to carry mines to the hulls of enemy vessels to blow themselves up. One estimate notes that a total of about 2,000 animals had died in operations. After the end of the Cold War these animals were housed in an aquarium in Sevastopol, Black Sea. Lack of funds for feed and medicine forced agencies to sell 27 animals to Iran (sea lions, seals, walruses and three cormorants). Their fate is not known.

Rate this Article

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
 
Article by same Author
Iran Stirs India-US Waters
Strategic Shift In Chinese Naval Strategy In Indian Ocean
INDRA 2005: From Sea to the Desert
Peace Mission 2005: Reverberations in India
Coercive Maritime Diplomacy
Maritime Legal Conundrum
Container Security Initiative: Is India Serious About Its Maritime Trade?
Terrorist's Underwater Strategy
The Unabated Menace of Sea Piracy
Indian Naval Diplomacy: Post Tsunami
Project Seabird: An Example of India's Maritime Prowess
Buying Security In Iraq: The Japanese Way
Change but Continuity: The Indian Navy Marches Ahead
Will LTTE Give Peace a Chance?
Casablanca: Al Qaeda’s Maritime Node
Bangladesh: Of Terrorists, Gun Runners and Pirates
Sea Piracy: India Boosts Countermeasures
Who Steers Al Qaeda’s Fleet?
Pakistan Naval Expenditure
Oil Tankers: Vital but Risky Commerce
Terrorism or Freedom Struggle: The Free Aceh Movement
Indo-US Naval Cooperation
Pakistan Navy and Nuclear Deterrence
Military Sales and Terrorism: The French Connection
Sino-Pakistan Maritime Initiatives
Nuclear Submarines and Indian Navy
Piracy at Sea
Terrorism and Tourism
Challenging Terrorism at Sea
Japanese Navy in Arabian Sea

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.