Home Contact Us
Search :


Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1182, 20 October 2003
International Security Environment – II: A Brief Overview of the International Environment
Maj. Gen. Dipankar Banerjee
Director, IPCS

In the backdrop of the emerging characteristics of the new era, it may be worthwhile to examine the salient elements of the emerging international environment.


The US is a pre-eminent power, militarily, economically, politically and technologically. It is unchallenged around the globe and will remain so for many decades hence.

·         Militarily – the US spends on defence more than all countries of the world combined and its lead in defence technology is even more awesome.

·         Economically. It constitutes a little less than a quarter of the world’s economy. In spite of the devaluation of the dollar, troubles in its domestic economy, growing unemployment, enormous trade and budget deficits, its currency continues to be preferred over others around the world, providing it a reserve and strength not available to others.

·         Politically. The US remains the only country able to affect developments around the world and dominate global institutions.

·         Technologically. It remains the world leader, though in selected areas it is increasingly challenged by others.

Yet, the US is in many respects remains out of tune with the world and isolated on many international issues; from global warming and climate change and trade and commerce and is an active opponent of the International Criminal Court. On disarmament questions, whether it is the CTBT, BWC, the 1972 ABM Treaty, or plans to deploy space based weapons, or as some believe, an impending decision to resume nuclear weapons tests, it remains the odd country in the international system. Further its policies are characterised by unilateralism, and a low opinion of the UN and its organs.

It is a unipolar moment, though a question may arise as to how long it will last. In the mid 1980’s Paul Kennedy’s theory of ‘the imperial overstretch’ predicting an early demise of American power proved utterly wrong. In the knowledge world of today, as long as the best young minds from the world flock to the US and its universities and remain there, its position is not likely to be challenged. The period of its dominance of the global order is likely to be measured in decades and not years. This is the wider reality that the world has to come to terms with.

Is the US a benign power? The question is irrelevant, but measured historically probably more benign than any other.

European Union

Soon to be a grouping of 25 countries with 325 million people it is unifying in many ways, rapidly and well. Combined together its economy is strong and stable. Yet, it is a disparate region with different identities, languages, cultures and beliefs with all that it portends for long term unity and stability. The Union is hardly a unitary power and its individual militaries are no match for the USA and there is little prospect for a unified collective force or an effective common security policy. Its military capability is dominated by NATO, which in turn is US led and without this support it is incapable of out of area operations even for robust peacekeeping. Besides, its economy too is likely to have major difficulties and its welfare state system is unlikely to be sustained due to demographic imbalance and tensions with immigration.


A country that has turned the corner at last, but still remains desperately poor. It is likely to continue to grow economically particularly if oil price remains high. Its population is reducing by a million a year and in five years will be lesser than that of Bangladesh or Bihar. Still a military power, but decidedly of the second rank, and for how long will remain a question? A great power in the future? Perhaps, but not in half a century. But, will remain an important player in selected areas due to its membership of the UNSC and its past.

The Middle East and the Central Asian Republics

A long as oil and natural gas remain the principal energy source for the world, the region will remain strategically very important. Yet, this critical dependence may well reduce significantly in the next fifteen to twenty years. Of these countries Saudi Arabia and Iraq will be the crucial players. The question of the region’s political stability will remain an important question and affect India’s interest vitally. In the case of the CAR, the domestic stability of the countries will be a major concern in the future, with a potential for negative developments no less than was the case in Afghanistan.


The next century will still belong to the Asia-Pacific. Its dynamic growth, uneven but cumulatively very high, innovativeness, enterprise and thrift will all act as powerful forces determining the region’s place in the world. Even though there may still be some hot spots, yet these problems are likely to be resolved without conflict or major confrontation.


There should be no doubt in any quarter that in 20 years, China will emerge as a major power and indeed the principal challenger to the US in the global order. The questions that have been asked about China in recent years and will continue to be valid for several years more are several, such as:-

·         Will it remain stable?

·         Will it engage the world through cooperation and accepted international conduct or resort to its historical middle kingdom syndrome?

·         The nature and capability of its military forces. Will they remain large, offensively structured, rapidly acquiring RMA capabilities and an ability to project power beyond what its neighbours consider as legitimate?

·         How will it relate to its neighbours and to rest of Asia?

Overall, the prognosis is one of optimism and maturity. Yet, sensible policies in its neighbourhood will call for a pragmatic approach.

It is on the basis of this very brief analysis that one needs to posit the challenges to India.

Extracts from a presentation at the National Defence College, New Delhi, India, on 14 October 2003 on the same subject

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China at 60 - The Military Dimension

China's Defence White Paper- Part 2

China's New Defence White Paper- Part 1

Towards a More Secure World (Part 2) - The UN High Level Panel's Report

Engaging Pakistan - The Composite Dialogue Process

India-China Border Talks

Policy to Counter Hostage-taking

Kashmir: A Trip Report

Future Threats: Challenges and Collective Actions

Nepal: Current Situation and Future Challenges

The Crisis in Nepal and Indias Response II

The Crisis in Nepal and Indias Response I

The SAARC Summit and After

The War in Sri Lanka

India-Pakistan Imbroglio over CBMs

International Security Environment – III: Challenges to India

International Security Environment – I: Recent Developments and Characteristics of the Era

Jiang's US Visit: The Strategic Perspective

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com