Home Contact Us
Search :
   

Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1610, 10 January 2005
 
China's New Defence White Paper- Part 1
Maj. Gen. Dipankar Banerjee
Director, IPCS
 

In December 2004 China released its latest and fourth Defence White Paper. It is important to examine it, as it reflects the developments and provides a glimpse inside the largest armed forces in the world. It is also an Army which is regularising and transforming itself rapidly. Though not yet acquiring the latest weapons and equipment, it is modernising under the euphemism to develop a "capability to win local wars under informationalised conditions". Next only to the US, China's defence expenditure has been growing more rapidly than any other country in the world. From a Chinese perspective this Defence White Paper is an attempt both at transparency and to justify the theory of its "peaceful rise'. Does the White Paper succeed in this task? Does it provide any useful additional information on the direction the PLA is heading? What should India note from these developments?

The last Defence White Paper was issued in 2002. It too was reasonably comprehensive and was in seven chapters. The newest one has ten. The difference is mainly in how the information has been restructured. Additional information provided now includes chapters on 'Revolution in Military Affairs with Chinese Characteristics', the 'Military Service System' and 'Defence Expenditure and Defence Assets'. China, unlike other nations such as say India, has yet to standardise the Report, which does not allow easy comparison with earlier versions.

This is the only second time that we have a reasonably comprehensive statement of defence policy from China, unlike the first two that provided information on specific issues only. The Report sees greater trend towards multi-polarization and economic globalisation and an 'intertwining of traditional and non-traditional security'. This emphasises once again China's perception of security as 'comprehensive' in nature, an idea, which it has consistently articulated over the years. Comprehensive national security is aimed at securing China from political, economic, military and social threats. The PLA's role encompasses all these areas and its subordination to the Party is reiterated as before.

Regarding external threats, it is concerned about the situation in the Taiwan Straits, which it sees as "grim". The verdict overall though is that the international security environment has improved for China. This is something of an understatement. After 9/11 there was a dramatic turn around in US policy towards China. From a likely future peer competitor and a challenge, Beijing has emerged as a strategic partner in the 'global war on terror'. In the other principal concern of the US, to prevent the 'axis of evil' countries from acquiring nuclear weapons, China has transformed its role from being the most likely proliferator to a key partner, as reflected in its role in the North Korean six party talks. What is China likely to make of this opportunity? Is the White Paper's highlighting of the Taiwan 'crisis' an attempt to resolve the issue favourably once and for all when the US remains distracted?

In the operational arena, the emphasis is on two areas; preparation for 'informationalised' warfare and jointness. The modernisation of the PLA will concentrate on creating what is termed an all round 'informationalised' force. This is understood in other armies to include enhancing war capabilities through better command and control, intelligence, electronic capabilities, psychological operations, cyber warfare and network centric warfare. Each is a distinct area of specialisation, there is little clue in the Report as to what has priority or what specific issues are to be addressed. Except that developing an 'automated command system' for the PLA has been cleared and guidelines for its implementation have been issued. The emphasis on modernisation, education and training pervades through much of the Report, particularly higher education for the officer corps, which has been a traditional weakness. An integrated tri-service logistics support system is being implemented in the Jinan Military Region since July 2004 to promote jointness.

Like in all armies, modernisation has to be accompanied by reduction in numbers. PLA strength is projected to go down by 200,000 soldiers to 2.3 million by the end of 2005. This is in continuation of other reductions initiated since the late 1980's reflecting its improved strategic environment. Even then it will remain substantially larger than any other army in the world. Service wise priority in modernisation will remain the Navy, the Air Force and the Second Artillery with land forces coming last.

The section on the Military Service System provides clear information for the first time on the service conditions in the PLA. Conscripts provide the rank and file for the Force with minimum service for two years. NCOs and above are all volunteers, each serving for a fixed number of terms of varying periods each depending on rank. Officer ranks are in ten grades in three categories. Maximum age for each rank has been laid down, which is substantially lower than in the Indian Army, a key command advantage that the PLA enjoys and which can be a battle wining factor.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China at 60 - The Military Dimension

China's Defence White Paper- Part 2

Towards a More Secure World (Part 2) - The UN High Level Panel's Report

Engaging Pakistan - The Composite Dialogue Process

India-China Border Talks

Policy to Counter Hostage-taking

Kashmir: A Trip Report

Future Threats: Challenges and Collective Actions

Nepal: Current Situation and Future Challenges

The Crisis in Nepal and Indias Response II

The Crisis in Nepal and Indias Response I

The SAARC Summit and After

The War in Sri Lanka

India-Pakistan Imbroglio over CBMs

International Security Environment – III: Challenges to India

International Security Environment – II: A Brief Overview of the International Environment

International Security Environment – I: Recent Developments and Characteristics of the Era

Jiang's US Visit: The Strategic Perspective

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com