Home Contact Us  

Military & Defence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2393, 15 October 2007
South Korean Posture on the Indo-US Deal and NSG
Sandip Kumar Mishra
Lecturer, Department of East Asian Studies, University of Delhi

The Indian Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, visited South Korea from 16 to 18 September. Besides bilateral issues, he also discussed the prospect of South Korean support for India in the 45-member Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). The spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs expressed India's expectations of a positive response from South Korea, but no remark on the issue could be further elicited from either party. There is, therefore, apprehension that India could not get any assurance from South Korea. The issue is vital for India as it has to negotiate both bilaterally and multilaterally with each member of the NSG to open their nuclear technology-related exchanges with it.

Although South Korea has not expressed any official view on India's ongoing efforts with the US to conclude a nuclear deal, which would de-facto provide India membership of the elite nuclear club, it has shown displeasure about the process. Recently, the South Korean representative in the Six-Party talks to dismantle the North Korean nuclear weapon programme, Chun Yung-wo, expressed his reservations about the Indo-US negotiations on the deal. He stated that any such deal would in no way be helpful for the global endeavour for nuclear disarmament. Speaking at the function organised by the Donga Ilbo, a Korean language newspaper, he specifically conveyed concern about the impact of the deal on the Six-Party talks to denuclearise North Korea.

Apparently, the remark of the South Korean representative came in an unofficial function and might therefore, be considered as his personal opinion but it is hard to deny that there is genuine concern in South Korea about the deal. Hence, India needs to improve its nuclear diplomacy in support of the Indo-US deal as well to become a more prominent player in Asian geo-politics.

First, it needs to be emphasised not only to South Korea but also to the international community in general, and the members of the NSG in particular, that the Indian nuclear programme has been largely peaceful. Indian willingness to sign the deal with the US is basically an effort to cope with its growing energy demands. Indian nuclear tests, a decade ago, were portrayed as a sign of Indian discontent to convince the international community for a comprehensive test ban treaty. Soon after its nuclear tests, India put a self-moratorium on further tests and came out with its nuclear doctrine which categorically supports the principles of 'no first use' against a nuclear weapon state and 'no use' against any non-nuclear state. India has been a responsible votary of not only nuclear but also general disarmament treaties.

Thus, the context of Indian nuclear programme cannot be compared with any other state. South Korea and the other NSG member states should be briefed on the special context in which India had to resort to nuclear weaponization. South Korea should be convinced of the need to de-hyphenate the nuclear programme of India from the North Korean or of any other country.

Indian diplomacy should also take cognizance of South Korean concerns over its status in changing strategic ecosystem of Asia. There is a sense of uneasiness in South Korea on its status as 'standing on the fence,' 'sandwiched' or 'loner' in the Asian politics. Recently, Newsweek characterised South Korea as an isolated country in Beijing-Washington rivalry. In recent years, South Korea which has been a long time ally of the US finds itself closer to China on many strategic issues of Northeast Asia, such as diplomatic resolution of the North Korean nuclear issue. The South Korean distress is further aggravated by Indian participation in a quadrilateral naval exercise along with the US, Japan and Australia. South Korea has a sense of being 'left-out' in both these key developments of Asian strategic affairs. Seoul, under its official slogan of 'Dynamic Korea,' has not only been able to register its significant economic presence across the globe but there has also been a Korean cultural wave (Hallyu) in the neighbouring countries of Asia. It is therefore, inexplicable why India has not included South Korea in its perception of an emerging and dynamic Asia.

If India wants to garner support from South Korea in the process of placating members of the NSG, it needs to accommodate the subjective perceptions of South Korea along with objective reality of the Asian politics. This is not a difficult task given the evolving non-zero sum game framework of cooperative security in the region. The success of Indian diplomacy lies in addressing such South Korean concerns and working for a more inclusive partnership in Asia. Indian diplomacy should take up these issues to further broaden the acceptance for Indian nuclear status and build a positive image in the emerging new strategic equation of Asia.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
'Comfort Women' and the Japan-South Korea Relationship

Denial and Provocation: Failure of US' North Korea Policy

Trump's Visit to East Asia

Shinzo Abe’s North Korea Strategy

North Korea: Testing the Limits of US-South Korea Relations

The US' Acrobatic Responses to the North Korean Riddle

Japan’s ‘New Approach’ to Russia: Is it Moving Forward?

India and the Koreas: Promises and Follow-ups

South Korea-North Korea: A New Version of Engagement

Trump’s North Korea Policy: Regional Implications

Park Geun-hye's Impeachment and South Korean Foreign Policy

US Tactical Nukes in the Korean Peninsula?

Forecast 2017: East Asia

Japan-China Contestation in 2017

Donald Trump and East Asia

PM Modi’s Visit to Japan: Prospects and Prudence

Future of the TPP and the US' Pivot to Asia

Russia’s Overtures in East Asia

China’s Game on North Korea

Six-Party Talks 2.0: Not for Denuclearisation but for Peace

Deadlock at Shangri-La: Is There a Way Forward?

North Korea’s 7th Party Congress: Context and Content

Japan’s New Security Laws: Context and Implications

What is the Efficacy of Sanctions on North Korea?

‘Brilliant’ Comrade: The Design in North Korean Madness

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.