Home Contact Us  

Military & Defence - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4761, 1 December 2014

Voice from America

China's Global Ambition: Need to Emulate Germany
Amit Gupta
Associate Professor, Department of International Security, USAF Air War College, Alabama

In 1972, Richard Nixon and Mao Zedong signed the Shanghai communique that resulted in a simple but brilliant bargain between the US and China. The US agreed to recognise China and give up propping up the regime in Taipei as the legitimate government of China and Beijing agreed not to pursue hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region. The agreement, as Australian scholar Hugh White has argued, led to forty years of regional peace and prosperity with China eventually benefitting enough to become the second-largest economy in the world.  The foundation of the Shanghai communique, however, has started to crack and led in part to the incumbent US President Barack Obama’s government decision to pivot to Asia. But it may well be a case of too little too late as Asia seeks to move to a new regional economic and political structure. 
The Unravelling of the Cold War Order
For a number reasons the old Cold War order has begun to unravel in the Asia-Pacific region and, therefore, allowed China to challenge the status quo that was in the US’ favour. First, China’s military capabilities have improved to the extent that the US can no longer contain from a chain of nation states that extend from Japan to the Philippines. China’s development of robust missile and anti-satellite capabilities have substantially raised Washington’s costs to employ power in the region. That said, China is a long way from being in the position to launch a global military challenge the US.  Therefore, it has instead sought to use the forces of globalisation to improve Beijing’s global position while seeking to lessen that of Washington’s.  Thus, China has developed a set of regional economic interdependencies that have made the future prosperity of Asian countries dependent on the continued growth and prosperity of the Chinese economy.

Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Malaysia, among others, now have China as their largest trading partner despite, in some cases, having free trade agreements or strategic alliances with the US. This has led to the emergence of contradictory strategic objectives for some of these countries.  Australia remains a major strategic ally of the US and was one of the countries that welcomed the pivot to Asia and the rotation of the US Marines via Darwin. But, simultaneously, Canberra is acutely aware that good economic relations with an economically robust China is vital to the Australian national interest. Australia escaped the great recession of 2008 because China ramped up its purchase of Australian natural resources, and, more recently, the Australian economy is in the doldrums because China has reduced its imports from Australia.

Additionally, China is now trying to create alternatives to the US dollar as the international reserve currency by engaging in currency swaps with some Southeast Asian countries and Australia.  

Finally, Beijing has now become the largest provider of economic projects and investments across Asia and the fact that Chinese entrepreneurs are now engaging in serious innovation will only increase Beijing’s ability to use its economic capabilities to gain regional clout. New Delhi, despite all the problems with China, actually expected a much larger foreign direct investment package to be offered by Xi Jinping during his visit earlier this year.  

The problem for Beijing lies in the fact that while regional nations welcome its economic dynamism they worry about its political and military muscle flexing and that is why the US decision to pivot to Asia was tacitly welcomed by so many countries for it was seen as counter-balancing Beijing.  

China’s long-term objective is to create a post-American order in the region and for that aspiration to succeed it will have to tone down its bellicosity and strive for rapid economic development in Asia. The role model for Beijing in this case has to be Germany which gave up its imperial claims and military prowess after World War II to become the most influential economic actor in Europe - and some would argue that continent’s banker. Beijing can bring about a similar economic structure in Asia if it starts to look forward economically while downplaying and eventually settling border disputes that do little to enhance China’s security but do much to aggravate it.  

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the US Air Force or the Department of Defense.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Amit Gupta,
"Mid-Term Elections: So What If the US Swings Hard Right?," 4 November 2014

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
The Iran Deal: Is it Hard to Resist?

PR Chari: Scholar, Gentleman, Institution Builder

The Battle against FIFA: Combating Corruption or Combating Power Transition?

Why the Rafale Deal Must be Welcomed

Obama’s Rapprochement with Cuba

Mid-Term Elections: So What If the US Swings Hard Right?

Modi’s US Visit: So Much Promise, Such Little Outcome

India and Australia: Beyond Curry, Cricket, and Commonwealth

Obama’s Russian Dilemma

And Then There is the Middle East: The Lack of an End-Game

US and the World Cup: Nationalism without Football?

India-US: Will Modi and Obama Come Together?

India, Pakistan and Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Irrelevance for South Asia

Boston Bombings: Possible Lessons

Special Commentary: India’s Missile Defence

If Pakistan Fails

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.