Home Contact Us
Search :
   

J&K - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2210, 17 February 2007
 
'Zero Tolerance' for Fake Encounters: A Reality Check in J&K
Priyashree Andley
Research Officer, IPCS
e-mail: priya@ipcs.org
 

In early February 2007, the J&K state authorities exhumed the body of a carpenter killed in an alleged 'fake' encounter. This was followed by massive street protests in Sumbal (Baramulla district) demanding a judicial probe into the killing. The exhumed body was identified as that of Abdul Rehman Paddar, killed by the Special Operations Group (SOG) in December 2006. The police claimed he was Abu Hafiz, a Pakistani militant killed during joint operations with the Central Reserve Police Force. Two other exhumed bodies, branded as 'foreign militants,' killed in February and March 2006, were identified as civilians named Nazir Ahmad Deka and Ghulam Nabi Wani.

These killings add to a long list of custodial killings in the state. Will the perpetrators of these acts be prosecuted fairly despite the impunity provisions available to security personnel under Indian law? Are such human rights violations hampering counter insurgency operations in the state? Will the Padder case prompt the government to change its course? Or will political pressures continue to motivate political parties' to take up these issues only at the time of state elections or assembly sessions?

Manmohan Singh has repeatedly assured the state that the central government will adopt a 'zero-tolerance' approach towards custodial killings. The inquiry into these killings ordered by Ghulam Nabi Azad, Chief Minister of J&K, is a step in this direction. However, there are three main factors preventing the situation from improving. Firstly, the law makes it compulsory to obtain permission from the central government to initiate criminal proceedings against army personnel involved in human rights violation; but permission is seldom given. The best example is the Pathribal case in 2002, involving the killing of five innocent civilians by five army officers. They are yet to face trial even after years of investigation and a CBI charge sheet filed against them for murder and destruction of evidence pertaining to the case.

Coupled with these legal provisions is the political stand of the state government. Azad clarified to the Opposition and People's Democratic Party (PDP) that the ground situation was not stable enough for the Army and security forces to be sent back to the barracks as demanded by them. His candid statement that the PDP should first give him in writing its willingness to withdraw its own security backs his stand. The PDP had demanded that the police take over the situation whereas Azad held that the police would have to also then start fighting militancy. Apart from these two different perspectives, one needs to mull over the fact that, with multiple responsibilities like, restraining drug abuse, the narcotics trade, fake currency rackets, theft, money laundering, and other criminal acts, will the local police force be willing and in a position (logistically and psychologically) to control the militancy? Hence, Azad held that there was no need to replace the army when the police and army were both performing different tasks.

Secondly, though the SOG (established under the National Conference-led government in 1996) was disbanded after the PDP-led coalition government came to power, it continues to exist. Whether it operates under the district police, and to whom is it accountable, are questions that remain unanswered. SOG functioning and operations are not transparent and this incident clearly reveals its irresponsible nature. Moreover, the danger arises that it can continue its operations even without AFSPA. Eleven members of the SOG were detained in this case, and their interrogations revealed the deliberate killing of an innocent civilian on the grounds that he was a militant. The internal security scenario has become more complex with sections of the police also involved in rights violations and fake encounters, allegedly for rewards and benefits. This will hamper the government's counter insurgency policy in the state. Moreover, how will civilians distinguish between the perpetrators of criminal acts and the state's team of investigators?

Finally, there is no consensus between the government and human rights authorities on the number of custodial killings in the state and the number of disappearances since 1989. The evidence is not accessible and investigations have become more difficult. The Ganderbal families were fortunate to have an investigation made after mass protests and rallies. What about thousands of persons who are still missing from the state, and innumerable applications that are pending with the State Human Rights Commission? The effectiveness and financial resources of the Commission have been declining over the past few years making it less active. Its recommendations are also not taken seriously by the state.

Given this background, if the Ganderbal killings can become a rallying point for those demanding an investigation into their missing family members, it will certainly put pressure on the state government to take up this issue seriously and not just during assembly sessions. This could give substance to empty slogans like 'zero tolerance' for human rights violations and fake encounters in the state. It will act as a reality check for such slogans.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Afghanistan: Is The Absence of War a Substantial Condition for Peace?

Pressure Politics: Quandary for Non-Local Labour in Kashmir

NATO Attacks: Ambiguity in Pakistan's Tribal Belt

The European Parliament Report on Kashmir: An Overview

Third Round Table Conference: Publicity Stunt or Towards Peace?

Dawn of a University in Rajouri

The Mirwaiz Hurriyat: 'Hurrying' to Resolve Kashmir

Bajaur Attack: Musharraf's Preempts; Militants' React

Afzal Guru: Hang me hang me not!

Scheduled Tribe Status for Paharis in J&K: A Gujjar Nightmare?

The Poonch-Rawalkote Bus and Increasing Militant Attacks: What Next?

Asserting the Internal Peace Process in J&K: The Second Round Table Conference

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com