Home Contact Us  
   

J&K - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4772, 9 December 2014
 
J&K: Modi Couldn’t do a Vajpayee in SK Stadium
Shujaat Bukhari
Editor, Rising Kashmir
 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s public meeting in Srinagar on Monday (December 8) was not a routine election meeting. It was surely a significant one since BJP has never put up a show of strength in the capital city like this. Modi had chosen Sher-e-Kashmir Stadium as the venue of the meeting.

The stadium has a mixed history of dissent and hope. It was the same place where the Indian cricket team faced a hostile crowd during two one-day international matches with Australia and West Indies in 1983 and 1985. The pitch was dug up by the anti-India youth most of whom were later to land in the armed rebellion camp. Both the matches proved to be a huge embarrassment for Indian team. That was an underpinning fact about the alienation in Kashmir but ignored as usual by the state. As the militancy erupted the stadium like other facilities remained deserted for years.

However, after the return of “democratic” government in 1996, it was used as “safe” venue for public meetings by the mainstream parties. Omar Abdullah’s coronation also took place in this stadium in June 2000. It was in April 2003 when the then Prime Minister A B Vajpayee used this venue to rekindle hope not only for Jammu and Kashmir but for the entire South Asian region. His unexpected turn in policy towards Pakistan took everyone by surprise.

After December 2001 parliament attack, both India and Pakistan were at the edge and war seemed imminent. When Vajpayee landed in Srinagar on April 18, 2003 and straightaway drove to the Stadium, the air was full of hostility. But when he opened his mouth it changed into an air of hope. The flow in his speech was statesman like. He offered friendship to Pakistan even as his colleagues wanted war. “As Prime Minister of the country I wanted to have friendly relations with our neighbours and I went to Lahore, but it was returned with Kargil. We still continued and invited General Pervez Musharraf to Agra but again failed. We are again extending a hand of friendship but hands should be extended from both the sides. Both sides should decide to live together. We have everything which makes us to have good relations,” Vajpayee told the gathering in the first public rally addressed by any prime minister in 15 years then.

Vajpayee did not stop there only but on a later occasion he changed the discourse on talks within the constitution, saying, “We will talk within the ambit of Insaniyat”.

On Monday, when Modi spoke to a gathering, that was not as well attended as was expected; he first chose to strike a chord with youth by talking about development, employment and progress. Obviously, luring the youth in election time is something that is well understood. Modi’s speech on non-political issues was full of strength as he took on traditional political parties in the mainstream for exploiting the people. He also touched people’s raw nerve- corruption that has led to a rot in the system.

He also made a reference to Vajpayee’s idea of “Kashmiriyat, Jamhooriyat and Insaniyat”. But he did not elaborate on those three important touch points. Modi also did not talk about the turnout in the first two phases of ongoing Assembly elections.

What is important is to underline the fact that his public meeting was held by locking down Srinagar city. Any election rally is manifestation of a free will and choice for people to align with a particular political thought. No doubt his rally was addressed by thousands of people and that does make it significant. Whether his adversaries call it a “managed” show but after all there were people who had come from different corners. Only a few years back, a party such as BJP would not have even thought of holding a rally.

May be it is because BJP is in power and people in Valley are prone to allurement. However, one thing is clear that BJP has made some inroads in Kashmir society and its plan is grand. It is not looking at immediate gains in Kashmir. Its target is to have greater share of political space by the end of 2020 when the next assembly elections would be due. All those bragging about BJP as a force inimical to Kashmir’s identity and culture will have a challenge to keep them at bay.

PM Modi was bound by Model Code of Conduct and it might not have been possible for him to announce sops for youth. But by invoking Vajpayee’s idea, he could not reach out to people at the political level. One departure is welcome. He avoided Pakistan bashing from the soil of Kashmir. But at the same time he preferred to be in denial mode as far as the political issue is concerned.

Elections have been held in past and will be conducted in future. Employment generation and development has not stopped in last over a decade. But that has not changed the situation on the ground. With an eye on elections, Modi could have done justice with his mentor Vajpayee by extending an olive branch to separatists who represent the alienation.

One may disagree with their strategy but it is a fact that they are indirect stakeholders in the resolution. Vajpayee had done a remarkable job by two-pronged involvement to infuse a life in the process of resolution. While extending hand of friendship to Pakistan from Srinagar, he drove the point home that Islamabad was party to the dispute. At the same time he engaged with the separatists. The period of 2003-08 raproshma brought a new hope for Kashmir and its tangled issue. On Monday Modi’s tone was soft but at the same time he could not carry forward the spirit of Vajpayee. Only similarity was the venue.

By arrangement with Rising Kashmir

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
J&K Government Formation: Tight Rope Walk

Balraj Puri: Loss of a Liberal voice

J&K: Back to square one

Jammu & Kashmir: How votes devour rights

Late but welcome realization

Jammu & Kashmir: The New Battle

Jammu & Kashmir: The New Battle

NC, NDA and Autonomy

What concerns young Kashmir?

LoC Trade Under Fire

J&K: A Haven for Agents?

J&K: Let the People Decide

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.