Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Jammu & Kashmir - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#793, 13 July 2002
 
Elections in Kashmir - V Making it Free and Fair
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

Everybody agrees that it is imperative to have free and fair elections in Jammu and Kashmir . How should it be made free and fair? How could the faith of the Kashmiris be regained in the election process and in the Election Commission of India?

 

 

International Observation

 

 

International observation of election process would increase the credibility of elections and would strengthen the democratic process in the state. The case for international observation has been argued earlier (Elections in Kashmir – II: An Argument for International Observation).

 

 

Involve NGOs and Human Rights Organizations inside India

 

 

A number of non-governmental and human rights organizations acceptable to the Kashmiris and the Indian government could also be involved in the election process. These organizations or human rights activists could be given observer status and provided access by the Election Commission of India. If the government is averse to involving human rights organizations, individuals of high reputation at the state and national levels could be asked to observe the elections. The following names could be suggested in this behalf: Tapan Bose, Kuldip Nayar, DR Kaarthikeyan, Muchkund Dubey – all these personalities have a high reputation and should be acceptable to all concerned parties. Tapan Bose, it might be recalled, was a part of the Election Commission that was announced by the Hurriyat Conference.

 

 

Elections under President’s Rule

 

 

There is a widespread belief that the NC would involve in rigging and unfair practices in the forthcoming elections; hence, it is better to have President’s rule proclaimed in the State and elections conducted thereafter. The Union government should reach an understanding with the NC on this issue and conduct the lections under the President’s rule. Though it would be the same Election Commission that would be conducting the elections, whether under President’s rule or otherwise, psychologically it would remove fears about rigging. 

 

 

Don’t Compel to Vote

 

 

It is essential to respect the decision not to vote. During the last elections, the security forces compelled people to vote. The unofficial argument of the government was that the security forces only asked people to vote, since they were threatened by the militants not to vote. Whether there is logic in this argument or not, this led to criticism by the Kashmiris that they were forced to vote. One can understand the government’s zeal to produce a better turnout, as that would indicate the return of normalcy in the state and rejection of militancy. The government should avoid this during the forthcoming elections. What is necessary at this juncture for the future of Kashmir is to increase the people’s faith in the electoral process. It is better to have a low voter turnout, which would be credible, than forcing its increase, giving room to question the credibility of the entire process. 

 

 

Curbing Militancy through Increased Patrolling

 

 

It is also important for the security forces to be alert and prevent militant attacks that would have serious political implications. As in the past, the militants are likely to carry out attacks on the minority communities, especially the Pandits and Sikhs. The objective would be to communally polarize society and keep the minority community away from the polls. It should be remembered that after the Wandhama massacre in 1998, before the parliamentary elections, the pandits threatened to boycott the elections. The militants could pursue the same strategy in the forthcoming elections; hence, it is essential to provide extra security to select villages where the minorities may be the targets.

 

 

The militants are also sure to target those who are contesting. They should be provided greater security along with those leaders who would be potential targets. The assassination of Abdul Ghani Lone was aimed to derail any effective role that he would play in the forthcoming elections and it was criminal negligence on the part of the state police to provide such inadequate security to him and let his assassins get away.

 

 

During the recent tensions between India and Pakistan , India has increased the level of its troops along the border. It is better to keep this build up intact, till the elections are over in Jammu and Kashmir

 

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet