Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Jammu & Kashmir - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#792, 13 July 2002
 
Elections in Kashmir - IV Enter Abdullah III
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

Omar Abdullah, Farooq Abdullah’s son was unanimously elected as the President of the National Conference (NC) in Srinagar at a grand conference on 23 June 2002. It is essential to analyse the change of guard as it has implications for Kashmir politics in general and the forthcoming elections in particular.

 

 

Farooq has openly announced that Omar would be leading the National Conference in the forthcoming elections and would be its Chief Ministerial candidate. The unanimous election of Omar Abdullah clearly shows that the NC stands united, and there is no internal division in the party. It is very essential for the National Conference, Kashmir and India , for that matter, that the NC fights the forthcoming elections united. The NC is the only party that has representation in the present State Legislative Assembly from all the three major regions of the State – Jammu , Kashmir and Ladakh. In the forthcoming elections, only the NC would be in a position to win seats from the three regions. Given the attempts to mobilize society by the Hindu Right and the militants on a communal basis, it is necessary for Jammu and Kashmir to have a party acceptable to all three regions, or at least to have cadres at grassroots level. Other than the NC no other party can boast of this factor, which is why it is important for the NC to fight the elections united. It should be remembered that when Farooq succeeded the great Sheikh, there was a split within the NC, thanks to the Congress! And the NC split had its implications in the Abdullah family, as their opponent happened to be GM Shah, Sheik Abdullah’s son in law.

 

 

Secondly, the change in the NC leadership and the Chief Minister augurs well for both the NC and Kashmir politics, as Farooq Abdullah stands alienated today due to his inefficiency and bad governance. Both the Kashmiris and his party cadres have been looking for a change and the selection of Omar would win the support of the people and NC cadres who had lost faith in Farooq. Omar is considered a clean and honest politician; besides, he is young. This image would certainly be a positive factor in the forthcoming elections. Omar is also probably the only leader inside and outside the NC, who will be the most acceptable leader in all three regions of the state.

 

 

Thirdly, the election of Omar has also paved the way within the NC to project many young faces, who are the offspring of the old NC leadership. If this move materializes, there would be several young faces within the NC.

 

 

There is some criticism, however, against Omar Abdullah. Since he was brought up outside the state, he cannot speak Kashmiri. Critics argue that he will not be acceptable to the local population. Besides the language factor, he is also seen as an outsider. However, it is doubtful, if these factors would work against Omar. From the limited interactions that Omar has had with his people, it appears that he would be received well. His ascendancy has also been criticized in terms of “dynastic democracy” which would destroy the “grass-roots democracy.” What Kashmir needs is a fresh face that is acceptable to all the regions and it does not really matter whether he or she belongs to a dynasty. Some of the most corrupt and undemocratic leaders in India , have reached the top in a “democratic” way and do not belong to any dynasty; Laloo Prasad Yadav, Jayalalitha are examples but the list will extend endlessly! 

 

 

When Omar was in Sanawar, he loved acting and took part in a number of plays. One hopes he fits the Kashmir stage. 

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet