Home Contact Us
Search :
   

J&K - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2777, 13 January 2009
 
Change Has Come to J&K
M Shamsur Rabb Khan
Freelancer
e-mail: samsur.khan@gmail.com
 

The successful completion of the 7-phase Assembly elections in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) shows that change has come to the state echoing what Barack Obama said about his victory in the US presidential election. This victory of democracy augurs well for India not only in the sense that it has heralded a new era but also in that the people have opted for a political solution through the ballot, not the bullet. Indeed, over 60 per cent of the electorate took part in the election, ignoring the separatists' call for boycott. Congress (I) chief, Sonia Gandhi has rightly remarked that it really did not matter which political party won the election, but the important thing was that the democratic process gained traction in J&K. The message from the Valley is loud and clear -people have wholeheartedly accepted Indian democracy and rejected the separatists who have been waging war on their behalf. There is a message to the Hurriyat Conference leaders that their current agenda needs changes in the changing politics of the state.

The faith in participatory democracy is the first sign of people returning to peaceful way of coexistence, rather than violence as means to score political gains. The high voter turnout underlines the fact that the policies of secessionists are negated, as people are tired of living under non-stop violent state. They want peace, and peace is where rule of law under a democratic government is. People are also disillusioned by the passionate call for Azadi, as they can feel as much freedom under Indian dominance as they would love to. Also, they realize how and why Pakistan has been dragging them into the quagmire of death and destruction in the name of secession. Above all, the ambiguous political plans of the separatists make no sense for a political solution at all.

Second, by choosing democratic government the people have opted for development, rather than conflict, violence and bloodshed that have taken a heavy toll of their social and economic development. In comparison to other states, J&K lags far behind on the development front with tourism, the backbone of Valley's economy, badly hit over the years. Hopes of economic and political stability that could be revived under an able government have been kindled once again. A genuine development can be possible only when there is a complete end to the violent ways that people have opted for in this election.

Third, since the Government of India has been seriously pursuing anti-terror measures in the Valley, the militants have been marginalized and quarantined, paving the way for a more terror-free environment. About 15 long years of the violent state of affairs have made the common people realize that there is more scope for peaceful existence under a democratic government than in responding to the bloody call for secession. Above all, the people, over all these years, have found themselves at the receiving end and pushed to the brink of brutal living at the hands of the militants and the security forces; hence, they preferred change for a peaceful and prosperous Kashmir.

Fourth, the people's participation in large numbers left the separatists wondering as to what went wrong with their agenda and why. Neither the passionate speeches of Mirwaiz Omar Farooq nor the religious appeals of Syed Ali Shah Geelani had any impact on the people. The high turnout in the elections also shows that people ventured out to vote despite the attempts to persuade them to keep away - they defied terrorists as well as separatists. The high point was that incidents of violence were few and no forcible disruption of the voting took place. The Amarnath shrine issue might well have its dual impacts - it paved the way for the BJP to capture 11 seats and it helped in convincing the people of the Valley to counter the BJP via ballot, as their non-participation would have had a larger impact on the overall political scenario of the state.

Lastly, the rising waves of terrorism in Pakistan have had a deep impact on the people of J&K since they have been misled and misread the call for a separate Kashmir as a genuine movement for azadi, which, over time, turned out to be an anti-Indian stance, and which prompted the militants groups to indulge in mindless terror attacks. Growing insecurity and instability in Pakistan vis-a-vis the rapid rise of India coupled with weak leadership from the Hurriyat Conference leaders turned the tide in favour of a democratic government.

Now, the onus is on the governments - both central as well as state - to share responsibilities in order to ensure the rights of the people, including those of Kashmiri Pandits displaced by the insurgency, to achieve a lasting solution. New Delhi, in close cooperation with Omar Abdullah, needs to push forward the development agenda and bring normalcy back to the troubled state in addition to healing the wounds of those who have suffered. Indeed, a greater economic and developmental agenda would help the state on to the path of progress. People have opted for democracy and now it is the turn of the leaders to seize this opportunity.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
The Killing of Shahzad: Links between the al Qaeda and the Pakistan Navy in the Open?

India's Contentious 50 Most Wanted Terrorists List

WikiWrecks: 26/11 and US Intent

Sino-Pak N-deal: a Setback to India-China Ties?

Two Summits; Conflicting Messages

David Headley’s Plea Bargain and India-US Relations

Tackling Maoist Terror

The Strategic Significance of Arihant

Enhancing the Credibility of CRPF

Role of Private Sector in Preventing Terror Attacks

Aerial Security Against Terror Attacks

Hindu Terror: A More Serious Threat

Tackling Terror: Reforms, Not Stringent Laws, Necessary

NSG Waiver: What does it mean for India?

Will the Nuclear Deal Hurt India's Foreign Policy?

Elections in the Himalayan Kingdom: New Dawn of India-Bhutan Relations

Sagarika: A Feather in India's Defense Hat

Securing India's Coastline

Time to Revive India-Iran Relations

Indo-Israel Defence Cooperation: A Step in the Right Direction

Poor Policing and Weak Intelligence Gathering

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com