Home Contact Us  
   

Indo-Pak - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1545, 28 October 2004
 
Pakistan-India Peace Process: Cautious Optimism
Salma Malik
Lecturer, Department of Defence & Strategic Studies, Quad-i-Azam University, Islamabad
 

Cautious optimism seems to be the underlining principle in the breakthrough in Pakistan-India relations. Recent initiatives are a welcome change from the atmosphere of hostility and near war like situation that loomed over the region for the past two years. The April 2003 initiative by Vajpayee and the guarded yet positive response from Pakistan has paved the path for yet another beginning.

Some questions that arise are: Would this process meet the fate of its predecessors? Would the contentious issue of Kashmir be addressed? Would the Congress government now well past its 100 days, continue with the process started by the BJP or take new initiatives? Has the recent rapprochement actually affected change in the rigid mindsets or is it a mere situational euphoria? What role can civil society play in the promotion and sustainability of the process?

The answer to the first question could be pessimistic, for it has been nearly ten months and the dialogue process has failed to deliver. Nevertheless, if one is to consider the genuine and sincere effort taken by both sides, then the future looks promising. The process has moved beyond the initial stage; the second phase should yield some results, even if at minor level, on less contentious issues.

On Kashmir, the recent visit of Pakistani journalists is a positive development and it is important that the Valley be made accessible to all, including Pakistanis; and other lines of communication be opened. However, the only viable solution to the core question would be possible if the aspirations and will of the Kashmiri people is given precedence over all other issues - for the lives and livelihood of the Kashmiris have been lost in this protracted conflict.

The Congress government now has had sufficient time in office to understand and modify the dialogue process according to its own policy options. The initial apprehension that the entire process would fail and also that the Congress government would like to give the process an entirely different perspective in order to have its own signature impact , were also dispelled. Although the initial meetings were rescheduled, the process as such remains intact, which again is a positive sign that this would prove better than any of the previous initiatives.

Lastly, the role of civil society and an increased people-to-people contact is important. The latter has been actively working to break down the barriers; there is a need for openness and dialogue at these levels. Lack of such interaction had developed strong misconceptions about each other; extremist elements on both sides fed on public hostility to their advantage. The best example can be seen from the names given to the various missile programs of both countries.

If the current initiative is not taken seriously, there might not be another opportunity available to the people for a long time to come. This would lead to a lot of negative sentiment, furthering extremist politics and increasing bitterness and animosity. All this would adversely affect the overall socio-economic and political well being of the country and would further embroil the two in a deadly strategic and conventional arms race, which would end up draining their resources entirely. Making statements at a 15-minute interval before the national media should not be taken as dialogue but a mere PR campaign. The SAARC summit in January proved to be an excellent icebreaker and the two sides lost no time in capitalizing on the opportunity provided.

Collectively, these developments herald a turnaround in the bilateral relationship. At the same time, a spectacular act of terrorism could easily derail the present entente. Old mindsets and vested interests in both countries that have no stakes in normalising India-Pakistan relations persist; they have much to lose in the peace process. The contrary factors must also be noticed that includes the public mood that craves for peace and stability in the subcontinent; the steady pressure of the United States and the international community; and the realisation in both countries that they are occupying the neither end of the Human Development Index and the upper end of Transparency International's Corruption Index. Above all, the Kargil conflict and the border confrontation crisis have made it clear that an armed conflict is no longer an option.

The history of bilateral CBMs is not encouraging. If instead a genuine and sustained effort is undertaken it may not be an entirely idealistic notion that South Asian peace initiative may prove to be a model for conflict resolution for other regions to emulate.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?

IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015

India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass

Burying the Past: A New Beginning for Pakistan and Afghanistan

India-Pakistan: Working Boundaries and Lines of Uncontrolled Fire

Of Inquilab and the Inquilabis

Pakistan: Of Messiahs and Marches

Zarb-e-Azb: The Decisive Strike

India-Pakistan: Faces in the Sand

India-Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons and Crisis Diplomacy

Elections in India and Afghanistan: Perspective from Pakistan

Afghanistan and Pakistan: Consequences of the American Exit

Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?

The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Ten Years of Ceasefire along the LoC: Through Elections and Media Ratings

The Failed State Index and South Asia: Revisiting the White Manís Burden

India, Pakistan and the Nuclear Race: Strengthening the Risk Reduction Measures

Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Holbrooke Visit: Reviewing the Messy Inheritance

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October  November
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.